
30/06/2025
WHY HAS PETER O’NEILL NOT BEEN HELD ACCOUNTABLE?
Forensic Evidence Confirms Signature in Controversial K41 Million Paraka Payment, Yet Legal Action Stalls
Port Moresby | 30 June 2025 –
Despite clear forensic evidence and findings from the now-defunct Task Force Sweep, former Prime Minister Peter O’Neill continues to walk free—raising serious questions about the independence of Papua New Guinea’s judicial system and the role of political interference in undermining justice.
At the centre of the controversy lies a letter bearing O’Neill’s signature, authorising the K41 million payment to Paul Paraka Lawyers, a transaction widely condemned as improper and potentially fraudulent.
Verified Signature, Unanswered Questions
An Australian forensic investigation conclusively verified the signature on the letter as belonging to Mr O’Neill, then serving as Prime Minister. The letter directed the Finance Department to make the controversial payment to Paraka’s law firm—an action that triggered national outcry and multiple corruption probes.
Despite this damning evidence, Papua New Guinea’s Supreme Court and judicial leadership have not moved to prosecute. The silence and inaction have only deepened suspicions of elite protectionism.
Collapse of Task Force Sweep and Erosion of Accountability
The now-disbanded Task Force Sweep, once tasked with tackling high-level corruption, had compiled compelling evidence implicating O’Neill and several senior officials. But instead of supporting its findings, successive government actions undermined the task force's mandate and credibility—leading to its eventual dismantling.
Many Papua New Guineans view the breakdown of these accountability mechanisms as a deliberate effort to shield powerful individuals from justice.
Judiciary Under Scrutiny
The reluctance of the judiciary—including the Chief Justice and Supreme Court bench—to pursue legal action, even with forensic confirmation of the letter, has prompted questions about judicial independence.
Why has the court not proceeded with charges against a former Prime Minister when hard evidence exists?
Observers argue that legal decisions are becoming increasingly politicised, eroding public confidence in the nation’s institutions.
Political Interference and the Culture of Impunity
Critics contend that O’Neill’s enduring political influence and network of loyalists across public institutions have effectively insulated him from accountability. His avoidance of arrest and prosecution—despite multiple calls for action—fuels perceptions of political interference in legal processes.
Such interference is not new in PNG, but the O’Neill case is particularly striking in its transparency and the strength of the evidence involved.
Growing Public Disillusionment
The public remains frustrated, with many citizens expressing anger over the failure to hold elites accountable. The belief that the rule of law does not apply to the powerful has become a dangerous and deeply ingrained narrative, weakening democratic trust.
“It’s not just about Peter O’Neill anymore,” said one Port Moresby civil rights advocate. “It’s about whether justice in Papua New Guinea still exists for the people or if it’s been permanently hijacked by the few at the top.”
Conclusion: A Test of Integrity
The Peter O’Neill–Paul Paraka payment saga is no longer just a political scandal—it is a test of institutional integrity. While forensic experts have done their part, the inaction of the courts and governing institutions is a stark reminder of the systemic issues plaguing the country’s governance.
Until accountability is enforced—no matter how high the position of those implicated—Papua New Guinea’s fight against corruption will remain a hollow promise.