02/06/2023
Copied from Central Makira Constituency Forum. An Analysis on the Infrastructures policies for schools in Solomon Islands by Martin Sugui;
**********************************
Below is an excerpt from my analysis of one of the policy statement of the Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development for school infrastructures. It is quite brief but the response was initially for a set of questions pertained to my tertiary study weekly tasks.
My intention of sharing this is for us to understand some of the policy statement that covers essential services provision, management or maintenance are clearly spelt out in such public documents. It is therefore imperative of us to consult these public documents before writing or speaking our opinions.
By doing so protects us from spreading unfounded accusations and misinforming our readers. As clearly stated in the school infrastructures policy statement (2011), all stakeholders are vital actors in it's implementation. The policy statement is a 24 page document.
Note that this analysis is solely my work and does not reflect the institution I attended, any organisation or individuals.
***************
Infrastructure Policy analysis by Martin Sugui:
The quality of school buildings affects the quality of teaching and learning. It has been observed that the quality of school infrastructure varies from school to school. It is the responsibility of school boards and EAs to ensure that the quality of the school buildings enhances high quality teaching and learning.
The Policy Statement and Guidelines for School Infrastructure (2011) was developed in collaboration with other key ministries: The Ministry of Health and Medical Services, the Ministry of Infrastructure Development in response to the need for quality infrastructure in schools throughout the nation. The policy provides guidelines for the design, development, construction, rehabilitation, repair and maintenance of all school infrastructures. As a result, it emphasizes “engineer-designed, well-constructed, maintained safe, hygienic, maintained and regularly upgraded” infrastructure. The policy is anticipated to set the quality and safety standards for school infrastructure.
The policy applies to all new infrastructures from ECE, primary and secondary and TVET. Infrastructure, in this context refers to classrooms, staff offices, specialist classrooms, dormitories, toilets, and water and sanitation. The definition needs to be expanded to include other infrastructure such as teacher housing on school compounds, sports facilities, ICT, and communications networks. In addition, school land issue needs to be considered under the service agreement between the Ministry and EAs.
The roles and responsibilities of stakeholders, from national to provincial and community levels, are outlined in the policy. The policy states that the financing of school infrastructure development is based on the principle of partnership. This recognizes that financing of infrastructure is a shared responsibility and finance can be sought from various sources such as the National Government, the Provincial Government, Education Authorities, development partners, school fees, contributions, and by community fundraising efforts.
Currently, available data from SIEMIS are inadequate for fulfilling the Policy objectives from the Policy Strategic Framework and Action Plan’s aims. Therefore, the need to improve SIEMIS (and to improve the capacity of providers to collect and report data) is important and relevant for the development of forecasts for school infrastructure requirements. Furthermore, the proposed National School Infrastructure Development Plan requires proper budgeting and costing.
The principle of partnership and the development of school infrastructure as per stated in the Infrastructure Policy needs to be given legal basis in the revised Education Act.