A Christian Response to the Transformed Wife

  • Home
  • A Christian Response to the Transformed Wife

A Christian Response to the Transformed Wife Living in grace and dignity

I hate to see TTW recommend Michael and Debi Pearl's book, "To Train Up a Child."  It is an awful, graceless book, and c...
07/06/2025

I hate to see TTW recommend Michael and Debi Pearl's book, "To Train Up a Child." It is an awful, graceless book, and contrary to Lori's opinion, the recommended tactics are abusive.

A main theme of this book is obedience training. (Side note: The Pearls liken obedience training in children to training animals, (Pages 3 and 4) which is off-putting since children are NOT animals; they are HUMAN BEINGS with a spirit, soul, personality, and emotions).

But back to the training. Michael and Debi Pearl describe it like this: "Training is the conditioning of the child's mind before the crisis arises. It is preparation for future, instant unquestioning obedience." (Page 4)

Disturbingly, the Pearls recommend starting obedience training when children are babies. Yes, babies.

Here is what they write:

"When my children were able to crawl (in the case of one, roll) around the room, I set up training sessions.

Try it yourself. Place an appealing object where they can reach it, maybe in a "No-No" corner or on the apple juice table (another name for the coffee table). When they spy it and make a dive for it, in a calm voice say, "No, don't touch that."

Since they are already familiar with the word, "No," they will pause, look at you in wonder and then turn around and grab it. Switch their hand once and simultaneously say, "No." Remember, you are not disciplining, you are training.

One spat with a little switch is enough. They will again pull back their hand and consider the relationship between the object, their desire, the command, and the little reinforcing pain. It may take several times, but if you are consistent, they will learn to consistently obey, even in your absence." (Page 5)

They then bizarrely compare this scenario to Adam and Eve being commanded not to partake in the forbidden fruit (Page 5). (As if a curious BABY reaching for objects can at all, with any credibility, be compared to the serpent appearing to two adults in the garden and dissuading them from believing the instructions God himself had just given them).

As I read through this book, I am struck by how the Pearls can seemingly think of few other ways to parent children than to use violence. Here is another scenario they share:

"One of our girls, who developed mobility early, had a fascination with crawling up stairs. At five months, she was too unknowing to be punished for disobedience. But for her own good we attempted to train her not to climb the stairs by coordinating the voice command of "No" with little spats on her bare legs. The switch was a twelve-inch long, one-eighth-inch diameter sprig from a willow tree." (Page 9)

I'm not sure why the Pearls would rather hit their baby with a switch rather than just get a baby gate. ?? Apart from that, I would frankly feel like a terrible person if I did this to a baby. It is appalling all the way around.

There is nothing virtuous about the Pearls' parenting methods, and TTW's glowing endorsement of them is problematic.

If you have read TTW for any length of time, you will see that she repeatedly admonishes us all to read Michael and Debi...
05/06/2025

If you have read TTW for any length of time, you will see that she repeatedly admonishes us all to read Michael and Debi Pearl’s book, “To Train Up a Child.” I see Lori recommend this book frequently to parents who are asking for advice about discipline issues, child rearing, and the like.

To put it bluntly, this book is disturbing: The Pearls are disturbing, and Lori’s continued recommendation of this book is disturbing.

Over the course of the next week or two, I will be outlining my concerns with the message of this book.

I will begin by stating how concerned I am for newborn babies of parents who buy into the tactics of the Pearls and TTW.

(The Pearls are heavy into “obedience training.” This is a resounding theme of their book. The problem is that they overwhelmingly resort to physical punishment for their children as they demand immediate obedience, (another theme) and they act as if making their children feel physical pain is virtuous parenting).

Here is the “advice” Michael Pearl gives for biting babies while nursing:

“One particularly painful experience of nursing mothers is the biting baby. My wife did not waste time finding a cure. When the baby bit, she pulled hair (an alternative has to be sought for bald-headed babies). Understand the baby is not being punished, just conditioned……
This is not discipline. It is obedience training.” (2002 printing, page 7)

Lori has written in her own blog about similar physical consequences for her children as they were nursing. She writes:

“Boy, did I get it from some of you for flicking my babies' cheeks when they were nursing and bit me. I only had to do it once to each of them and they stopped. I did it hard enough that they cried. I didn't want my breast bitten into. I meant business. I wasn't going to fool around with them in this area. They were not going to get away with it.” (Link in comments).

I don’t know about you, but advocating for physically hurting a baby makes me sick, and I wouldn’t take one shred of parenting advice from anyone who thinks it is okay or acceptable. This is a cruel and abusive tactic.

03/06/2025

Ever noticed this?

We’re told simultaneously that the purpose for marriage is holiness, not happiness, but we’re ALSO told that we need to keep our husband happy.

Just an interesting dichotomy, and thank you to commenter LH on Facebook today for pointing this out!

And also--remember that there are churches that DON'T teach this. Find those churches and join those communities!

Saying “feminism” began in the garden with Eve is silly.Eve sinning didn’t make her a “feminist.” She sinned, as did Ada...
03/06/2025

Saying “feminism” began in the garden with Eve is silly.

Eve sinning didn’t make her a “feminist.”

She sinned, as did Adam, by eating the forbidden fruit and choosing not to obey God.
Disobeying God in the garden had nothing to do with “feminism.”

Women can sin without being a “feminist.”

🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

A shout out to all nurses who help take care of others in their most sick and vulnerable times!If this reprehensible sta...
29/05/2025

A shout out to all nurses who help take care of others in their most sick and vulnerable times!

If this reprehensible statement reflects the spiritual condemnation with which TTW views all female nurses, I certainly hope she is insisting on being cared for by male nurses only.

28/05/2025

One reason patriarchal Christianity is so unhealthy for women is that it strips them of their unique individuality— their passions, gifts, and personality. All that matters in this system (and all their husbands value) is that they are submissive and sexually available. Godliness, in this system, is losing one’s identity to conform to a role. This is not at all the way God intended for us to live.

From “Emotionally Healthy Spirituality” by Pete Scazzero:

“True, Jesus did say ‘If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me’ (Luke 9:23).

But when we apply this verse rigidly, without qualification from the rest of Scripture, it leads to the very opposite of what God intends.

It results in a narrow, faulty theology that says, ‘The more miserable you are, the more you suffer, the more God loves you. Disregard your unique personhood; it has no place in God’s kingdom.’

We are to die to the sinful parts of who we are …. We are not called by God to die to the “good” parts of who we are.

God never asked us to die to the healthy desires and pleasures of life— to friendships, joy, art, music, beauty, recreation, laughter, and nature.

God never asks us to annihilate the self. We are not to become “non-persons” when we become Christians. The very opposite is true. God intends our deeper, truer self, WHICH HE CREATED (my emphasis) to blossom freely as we follow him.”

(Pages 27 and 28)

There is a reason Titus 2 teachers and patriarchal Christians turn a blind eye to studying Genesis 2:18.  The reason is ...
27/05/2025

There is a reason Titus 2 teachers and patriarchal Christians turn a blind eye to studying Genesis 2:18.

The reason is that a study of this verse (which captures what GOD HIMSELF, at the onset of creation, pronounces women to be) is at very stark odds with what patriarchal Christians have pronounced women to be.

I choose to believe what God himself says. 😉

In this verse, (Genesis 2:18) God declares woman as “ezer.” The interesting thing about this word is that it’s used nineteen other times in the Bible—three times to describe countries to whom Israel appealed for military help, and sixteen times to describe GOD as Israel’s helper.

Yes, you read that right: A word used to portray God as Israel’s helper was the word God used to describe the woman he created.

As you can see, “ezer” is not a word with a flimsy meaning. It’s not a word to describe a delicate fragile flower.

Rather, “ezer” describes strength, rescue, refuge, heroism. Woman was created to live side by side with man as a source of joy, refuge, strength, companionship, and wisdom.

Now to the below post:

Could anyone who acknowledges the truth of Genesis 2:18 really trot out a post like this with any coherency of thought?

I don’t think so.

Understanding what God actually said about the first woman is extremely illuminating and helps us understand that this term, “ezer”, does NOT compute with subservience, helplessness, and existing for the sexual convenience of men.

To proliferate these notions is to be in direct opposition to what God himself said at the dawn of creation.

If women were bestowed with the descriptor of “ezer,” it is clear God made women to be capable of independent thought, reason, and ideas. It’s also clear that men and women were meant to live as corresponding partners rather than in hierarchal struggles.

If a woman casting a vote undermines a “husbands’ authority” in the home, the husband is a controlling tyrant who is narcissistic. He is also in direct opposition to God.

To end, I agree with Lori that women voting in elections undermines “male leadership in everything.” (Yes, Lori, it does. God never ordained a world where men get to decide everything for women. The God who labeled the first woman as “ezer” never intended for women to be voiceless and marginalized). 🤷🏻‍♀️

I agree, Lori! Christians should indeed be some of the most kind and friendly people around—even to women who work outsi...
27/05/2025

I agree, Lori!

Christians should indeed be some of the most kind and friendly people around—even to women who work outside the home, women who are college students, and women with tattoos who are unmarried and not virgins.

We are to love one another. Period. Our gentleness should be known to all. (Philippians 4:5).

23/05/2025

There is absolutely no room for the spiritual infantilization of women in the gospel of Jesus.

2 Peter 1:3 tells us this:

Everything that goes into a life of pleasing God has been miraculously given to us by getting to know, personally and intimately, the One who invited us to God. (The Message)

Said another way, it is God’s divine power that gives us everything we need for a godly life. (NIV translation)

The power of God’s truth and wisdom is available to all people. It does NOT have to be siphoned to women through men.

God does speak and does impart his wisdom, strength, comfort, and truth directly to women. This is the truth of scripture.

22/05/2025

Christians who downplay the importance of emotional safety and emotional connection in marriage have likely deadened their own emotions.

Those who deaden their own emotions typically are unable to acknowledge or process their own emotional pain.

When someone can’t acknowledge their own emotional pain (anger, hurt, fear, anxiety, depression, etc), they certainly can’t acknowledge the validity of anyone else’s feelings or pain.

Is this modus operandi really the Christian way?

Pete Scazzero, author of “‘Emotionally Healthy Spirituality” says it is not and comes at this question with the premise that Christians cannot be spiritually healthy without being emotionally healthy— they are inextricably linked.

He writes:

“To feel is to BE HUMAN (my emphasis added). To minimize or deny what we feel is a distortion of what it means to be image bearers of our personal God.

To the degree that we are unable to express our emotions, we remain impaired in our ability to love God, others, and ourselves well…..

Sadly, some of our Christian beliefs and expectations today have, as Thomas Merton wrote, ‘merely deadened our humanity, instead of setting it free to develop richly, under the influences of grace’”.

(Pages 26-27)

Address


Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when A Christian Response to the Transformed Wife posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

  • Address
  • Alerts
  • Claim ownership or report listing
  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share