01/12/2025
I just talked about wanting a 911 competitor with multiple variants. And Genesis is ACTUALLY doing it.
The Magma GT. Mid-rear-engine layout. Twin-turbo V8 - basically two of their WRC four-cylinders stuck together.
But here’s what gets me: They’re not doing a limited run. They’re building EIGHT variants:
Base modelSGTSRoadsterLightweight versionClubsportGT3 street-legalGT3 race car
I literally just posted about wanting the Toyota GR GT to do this - fight the 911 with multiple variants, give people options from entry-level to race car. Genesis looked at that playbook and said “we’re doing it.”
The only other mid-engine car with this kind of trim strategy? The Corvette C8. And I commend Chevy for it - base to Z06 to ZR1 to E-Ray gives people choices. Genesis is doing the SAME thing.
My childhood brands - Toyota, Honda - they WON’T do this. Toyota’s GR GT? We don’t even know if it’ll have variants. Probably one model, maybe two.
But Genesis? Ten years old and they’re making a mid-engine supercar with EIGHT variants to fight Porsche, Ferrari, McLaren head-on.
Genesis keeps doing what I WANT Honda and Toyota to do.
They’re racing it in GT3, which means production cars HAVE to exist (homologation rules). Could be 2027 production. Dedicated reveal event next year.
The Corvette proved you can do extensive trim levels with a mid-engine car. Genesis saw that and said “hold my soju.”
This is what I’ve been asking for: ✅ 911 competitor strategy ✅ Multiple variants (not just one limited model) ✅ Racing credibility (GT3) ✅ From entry-level to extreme ✅ Roadster option ✅ Near-term production
Genesis is executing my vision for what the GR GT should be.
My childhood brands won’t do it. Genesis will.
That’s the story of the last five years. #911