Splendid Truth (2025)

05/11/2025

I am not really against the DDF decision: (I don't really have a problem with either Coredemtrix or mediatrix of all graces which I find even less trouble some) but I am just sharing this from a humourous and ironic perspective (also I'm not necessarily against giving same s*x individuals blessings if properly explained and understood).

H/T Fr. Daniel Gordon Dozier for sharing this.

05/11/2025

just made history as NYC’s first openly mayor.

For many, his victory signals a new progressive dawn — promises of free housing, guaranteed , and expanded under a city-run . But for , it raises an important question: can a Catholic, in good conscience, support ?

That’s the very question Trent Horn and Catherine R. Pakaluk ask in their book “Can a Catholic Be a Socialist?” — and their answer, backed by both reason and faith, is a resounding no.

The authors don’t just critique socialism ; they expose why it fundamentally conflicts with the Catholic understanding of the human person, property, and freedom. Drawing from the Magisterium, they remind us that the Church has consistently condemned socialism since Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum (1891), which defended as a natural right and a safeguard for families. Pius XI reaffirmed this in Quadragesimo Anno, stating clearly:

> “ socialism, socialism, are contradictory terms; no one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist.”

And John Paul II went even further in Centesimus Annus, warning that socialism — even in its * * forms — places the collective over the person, thereby violating and the .

But beyond theology, Horn and Pakaluk show how socialism also fails and . The so-called “calculation problem,” first noted by Ludwig von and later explained by Thomas , exposes why socialist can’t work in practice. Without real prices, planners can’t know how to allocate efficiently — leading to , , and . Good intentions aren’t enough when the system itself suppresses truth about value and scarcity.

And as Sowell often said:

> “The first lesson of is scarcity. The first lesson of is to ignore the first lesson of economics.”

The Church’s teaching on subsidiarity and solidarity gives us a middle way — one that avoids both unchecked and the suffocating paternalism of socialism. True requires empowering , local , and free institutions to serve the common good — not replacing them with bureaucratic control.

So as Mandami’s socialist experiment begins in , Catholics should reflect deeply on what kind of “justice” we’re seeking. A system that denies private initiative, suppresses voluntary , and centralizes power may promise equality — but it inevitably breeds dependency and moral decay.

Horn and Pakaluk’s book is not just a warning; it’s a guidepost back to Catholic realism — where economics and morality meet, and where freedom serves truth.

---

05/11/2025

🪓 “Never thought I’d die fighting side by side with an elf…”
“What about side by side with a friend?”
“Aye… I could do that.”

This meme captures something deeper than just humor — it speaks to a truth that many of us forget: that the defense of human life transcends party lines.

In today’s political climate, is too often reduced to a partisan identity. But being pro-life is not — and never has been — the exclusive domain of one party. It’s a and human conviction rooted in the belief that every life is , from conception to natural death.

Imagine what could happen if pro-life and pro-life stood shoulder to shoulder — not as rivals in a political war, but as friends united in protecting the most vulnerable among us. This doesn’t mean ignoring differences, but it does mean recognizing that the fight for life requires all of us: left, right, and everything in between.

At its core, the pro-life movement is not about power — it’s about , , and . It’s about building a where both mother and child are cherished, where are supported, and where political tribes give way to a common humanity.

We can disagree about , , or — but when it comes to life itself, may we learn, like Gimli and Legolas, to look beyond our differences and fight side by side as friends.

---

National Republican Congressional Committee Students for Life of America
National Pro-Life Alliance

04/11/2025

JD Vance just dropped a speech on religion and politics—and it’s more than just politics. 😮 He’s talking about faith, the Kingship of Christ, and why these ideas actually matter for society today. Let’s break down what he said and why it’s worth paying attention.

🇻🇦🇺🇸In a recent speech on religion, JD Vance didn’t just talk politics—he touched on something deeper: the role of faith in shaping society. From the importance of the Kingship of Christ to the intersection of politics and morality, Vance highlights ideas that resonate with those who see faith as central to public life. This post dives into what he said, why it matters, and how his perspective offers a fresh look at Integralism and the place of Christianity in modern society.

Link in the comments 👇below

04/11/2025

Based on the clarification of Marian titles by the DDF I'm just gonna be based and call Mary "The Mother of All Protestants" 😂 😜

04/11/2025

Dear friends in ,

I want to share with you and reflect on a recent and very important doctrinal document just issued by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the (DDF), Mater populi fidelis (“The Mother of the People”). This note helps us deepen our understanding of how we honour the Blessed in light of the , and how we ensure our devotion leads us ever more to Christ.

Why this matters – As believers we recognise as the Mother of our and our spiritual mother. For many Christians (especially in the tradition) Mary holds a beloved place of devotion, intercession, and example. But devotion always carries a theological responsibility: we must ensure that our language and practices remain faithful to the truth of Christ’s unique mediating role, without inadvertently placing Mary “on Christ’s throne,” so to speak.

What the note teaches – A few key take-aways:
• The Church encourages the use of titles such as Mother of Believers, Spiritual Mother, Mother of the Faithful, recognising the maternal care Mary has for each disciple.

• But the does not endorse the title Co-redemptrix for Mary. Why? Because although Mary’s yes-to-God was absolutely significant, Christ alone is the . To call Mary “Co-redemptrix” risks confusion: it might suggest Mary is a co-equal redeemer alongside Christ, which the Church says is theologically misleading.

• Similarly, the title Mediatrix of all graces is permitted only in a very carefully qualified sense—not as if Mary dispenses grace instead of Christ, or independently of him. The document emphasises again that Christ is the one Mediator between God and humanity. Rather it is better if we say that God dispenses His *through* Mary

• Finally, the document reminds us that our must always be Christ-centred. Mary’s role is to lead us to Christ, to deepen our union with him, to help us live in grace — not to pull attention away from him.

What this means for us – In practice, it means a few things:

1. When we pray the or approach Marian devotion, let’s do so with this clarity: Mary is our mother in faith, our companion, our intercessor — but she always points us to her Son, the Lord.

2. When we encounter devotional materials, social-media posts, or theological claims about Mary, we should ask: “Does this enhance my relationship with Christ, or does it risk eclipsing him?”

3. It invites us to a more mature Marian spirituality: one that is not merely sentimental, but rooted in , grounded in , and aware of the broader community and the economy of salvation.

Let us pray: “Holy Mary, Mother of and Mother of the faithful, help us to remain always in your Son, and to live by his grace and truth. Amen.”

---

04/11/2025

✝️ Is — Not Just in Hearts, But in Society ✝️

“When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real , well-ordered discipline, peace, and harmony.”
— Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas

"The duty of offering genuine concerns man both individually and socially.
This is “the traditional teaching on the duty of individuals and societies toward the true religion and the one Church of Christ” (CCC 2105)."

This truth isn’t about — it’s about order, justice, and flowing from recognizing the Kingship of Christ over every human heart, family, and nation.

The foundation of Christ’s Kingship lies in the biblical teaching that all authority originates from God.
Scripture repeatedly affirms that sovereignty belongs to God alone, who establishes and deposes rulers according to His will:

Daniel 2:21 – “He changes times and seasons; he removes kings and sets up kings.”

Psalm 22:28 – “For kingship belongs to the Lord, and he rules over the nations.”

Isaiah 9:6–7 – “For to us a child is born… and the government shall be upon his shoulder… Of the increase of his government and of peace there will be no end, on the throne of David and over his kingdom.”
This prophetic oracle anticipates a divine ruler who unites justice and peace—fulfilled in Christ, the Prince of Peace.

Jeremiah 23:5–6 – “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will raise up for David a righteous Branch, and he shall reign as king and deal wisely.”

Romans 13:1 – “There is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.”

👑 Why the Kingship of Christ Matters for Society

Christ’s kingship isn’t just a theological concept—it has real, practical implications for the way we live together as a society. When Christ reigns in our hearts and communities:

1. Justice is upheld – His perfect wisdom and mercy guide laws and governance, protecting the vulnerable and ensuring fairness.

2. Peace is fostered – True peace comes when love and truth guide relationships, not selfish ambition or fear.

3. Moral clarity emerges – Society flourishes when truth and virtue are respected, reducing corruption, exploitation, and moral chaos.

4. Unity and common good – Christ calls us to look beyond self-interest, inspiring communities to care for one another, especially the marginalized.

5. Hope and purpose – A society rooted in Christ’s kingship recognizes the dignity of every person and the ultimate goal of human life, countering despair, nihilism, and social fragmentation.

📖 Rooted in Sacred Scripture, reaffirmed by Quas Primas, and upheld in the Catechism, the message remains timeless:
Society needs Christ.
Because Christ is King. 👑

---

03/11/2025

🙌 Defending the Whole Spectrum of : Beyond , From to Natural Death

The 's commitment to life is often summarized by the phrase, ** , from conception to natural death." This is known as the Consistent of Life—a comprehensive framework that defends the sanctity of every human life at every stage.

This commitment extends far beyond opposing ; it requires active protection and nurturing of life for the unborn, the sick, the vulnerable, the elderly, and the marginalized.

---

⚕️ Historical Legacy of : Care for the Sick and Vulnerable

The ’s teaching on the
is profoundly embodied in its long history of charitable contributions, especially in caring for the sick and vulnerable. This didn't start recently; it is a core mission dating back to early :

Foundation of Hospitals: The Church is credited with establishing many of the world's first formalized hospitals and systems. In an era when pagan societies often neglected the sick and dying, early Christians, inspired by the teachings of (like the Parable of the Good Samaritan), provided direct care.

The Early Centuries: Figures like Fabiola (4th century) founded hospitals specifically to care for the sick and impoverished, personally tending to their wounds. During the Ages monasteries and religious orders ran hospices and almshouses that served as early versions of a welfare state, caring for pilgrims, the elderly, orphans, and the ill.

Religious Orders as Caregivers: Throughout history, religious orders, particularly communities of women (Sisters and ), developed institutions and supplied the personnel for nursing and advanced care, often treating victims of epidemics like cholera and yellow fever when others fled. Today, global organizations like Catholic Charities and Catholic Relief Services continue this work, running extensive networks of hospitals, rehabilitation centers, food banks, and women's shelters, serving people regardless of their faith or background.

This unbroken legacy demonstrates that the defense of life is not just a political stance, but a practical, active ministry of compassion for the human person at all stages of existence.
---

Historical Charity and Care for the Vulnerable

Foundation (Matthew 25:31–46): The core instruction to care for the poor and vulnerable—"I was hungry and you gave me food, I was sick and you visited me"—is the theological driver for all Catholic charity.

Didache (Early Text, 1st-2nd Century): Includes prohibitions against murder, abortion, and infanticide, demonstrating an early consistent defense of life.

Saint Basil the Great (4th Century): Established one of the first major public institutions for the sick, poor, and traveling—known as the Basiliad—a precursor to modern hospital complexes.

---

📚 Bibliography

1. Catechism of the Catholic Church. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1993. (Specifically articles 2270-2275 on respect for human life).

2. Pope St. John Paul II. Evangelium Vitae (The Gospel of Life). Encyclical Letter, March 25, 1995.

3. Second Vatican Council. Gaudium et Spes (Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World). Promulgated by Pope Paul VI, December 7, 1965.

4. Blainey, Geoffrey. A Short History of Christianity. Viking, 2011. (Addresses the Church's role in establishing early welfare and hospital systems).

03/11/2025

🔥 Apparently, this post has triggered everyone — , , and even some and Catholics 😅

My Threads post comparing my 20s (libertarianism) to my 30s (Catholic Integralism) has been blowing up — and I think I understand why.

In modern politics, * * and * *usually means the power to do whatever you want. But the and tradition understood freedom very differently — as the power to do what is right.

taught that the purpose of is to cultivate virtue, saying that “man is by nature a animal” because only in a rightly ordered community can we live the good life. Cicero wrote that “a is the property of the people only when it is governed by ,” meaning politics must conform to a higher order.

later brought these ideas to their fulfillment: law, he said, is “an ordinance of reason for the common good” (ST I-II, q.90). Human law must reflect and natural law — otherwise it loses its legitimacy. In other words, no society can thrive if it cuts itself off from the moral order established by .

Even the American Founders, despite their differences, understood this principle. John Adams famously said, “Our was made only for a moral and people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” The Founders knew that liberty without virtue collapses into license.

Contemporary like Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Taylor, and even some secular thinkers now recognize that modern liberalism’s attempt to build a moral order without a moral foundation has left us fragmented, lonely, and cynical.

That’s what Integralism actually stands for — not or , but the recovery of an older truth: that and , and politics, belong together in the pursuit of the common good. isn’t just Lord of your heart; He’s Lord of all reality — including the social and political order.

So yes — once upon a time I said, “Don’t tread on me.”
Now I say, “Cast Satan into Hell.” 😈✝️

Link to my threads down below 👇
---

02/11/2025

"Gentlemen, I am a . As far as possible, I go to every day. This is a . As far as possible, I kneel down and tell these beads every day. If you reject me on account of my religion, I shall thank that He has spared me the indignity of being your representative."
Belloc made this statement in response to his opponent's campaign slogan, "Don't vote for a Frenchman and a Catholic". Despite this opposition, Belloc was elected in 1906.

The Backdrop of Hilaire Belloc's 1906 Speech:

In the early 20th century, anti-Catholic sentiment was still prevalent in , and Catholics were often regarded with suspicion by much of the -majority public. When Hilaire Belloc, an Anglo-French writer and a devout Catholic, ran for the Party in the South Salford constituency during the 1906 general election, his and national background became a central point of contention.

The election in South Salford was expected to be close, and the opposing Conservative campaign resorted to using popular prejudice to sway voters, employing the inflammatory slogan: "Don't vote for a Frenchman and a Catholic".

Belloc's local Catholic clergy even advised him to avoid the topic of his religion during his campaign speeches, fearing it would cost him the election. However, Belloc, known for his strong convictions and defiance of the establishment, decided to confront the prejudice head-on.

He chose a Catholic school for his first public meeting venue. Disregarding the advice to stay silent on the matter, he pulled a rosary from his pocket during his speech and delivered his famous, powerful statement, effectively turning a moment of potential weakness into a display of principle and strength that resonated with the audience and ultimately led to his election victory.

02/11/2025

My politics in my 20s: libertarianism

My politics in my 30s: Catholic Integralism

02/11/2025

MLB

lol 🤣

Splendid Truth

05/11/2025

05/11/2025

05/11/2025

04/11/2025

04/11/2025

04/11/2025

04/11/2025

03/11/2025

03/11/2025

02/11/2025

02/11/2025

02/11/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share