24/04/2023
On the topic of "adoption", by David Cornsilk:
"Historically speaking, there is a reason “adoption” was taken from individual Cherokees and vested in a centralized government process where the Council was vested with all identity questions.
During the early years of interface between Cherokees and wh!tes it was common practice for Cherokee men to take white men as brothers, adopting them into their clan. This adoption was binding on the whole nation and brought with it full rights of citizenship. Many of the adopted white men married Cherokee women further strengthening their rights in the tribe.
The practice became so common that Cherokee leadership became alarmed at the number of wh!te men having full rights in the tribe. In 1827 the Council abolished adoption and took that right from the individuals and vested in the Council itself.
The concept of adoption conferring any rights beyond a relationship with a particular family is nonexistent. The members of the Language Consortium have no more right to adopt someone than any other Cherokee. That doesn’t mean it can’t happen within a family or even a circle of friends, but it meaning beyond that circle is negligible if at all. Certainly, no one has any rights outside that very small bubble
There is an article I read many years ago in the Journal of Cherokee Studies about this very topic. Unfortunately I don’t recall the author, title or date. But if someone had time to look for it, the information provided would be timely in regard to how the Language scholars, at least some, have behaved."