12/24/2025
Marriott Hotel: Ongoing Testimony
On December 16th, the City of HR added documents from Line29 (the architect/applicant for the new Marriott AOC) and from opponents.
Publishing here the letter from the legal firm (Jordan Ramis)representing the applicant.
Also publishing the letter from Hathaway Larson describing in detail all the ways in which the application does not meet City of Hood River Municipal codes. (And sorry ,. Pages 4 and 5 of the letter turned out at the end…)
Attorney Michael Connors also describes problems with the way in which city staff “proposed several conditions of approval that improperly defer compliance with substantive approval standards to a later date with no public process.” (Highlights added by me)
Meaning… city staff took the applicant’s failure to provide a compliant landscaping plan, lighting plan, compliant garbage collection & mechanical equipment and does not show any evidence that Line29 will actually be able to satisfy the approval process.
Other issues described by Mr. Connors:
- The City Staff has not explained why it should change its standards or previous interpretations of code just for this project.
-
The City’s code doesn’t use the IBC (International Building Code)to determine compliant building height, and the staff’s claim that the city’s ordinances rely on those standards is incorrect (because those IBC standards were adopted AFTER the existing and controlling ordinances were put into place).
- The applicant continues to fail to comply with the maximum building height limitation.
- City staff is apparently willing to defer compliance with code issues until AFTER approval of the project. Previous legal decisions have settled that a city “cannot defer compliance with approval criteria pursuant to a condition of approval.”
- Development doesn’t meet compatibility standards
- The development doesn’t comply with parking requirements.
- This includes the failure of City to show that it actually has funds to build a parking structure (NOTE: a question from a city councilor during the discussion of parking ‘in-lieu” fees had city staff admitting that the fees gathered from those fees were entirely inadequate to build a parking structure.
- The construction of the hotel will cause two 2 intersections to fail, and the applicant shows no mitigation measures.
- City Staff admits that the access doesn’t comply with access standards. Applicant hasn’t requested a variance. The development fails to comply with the requirement.
- Development fails to comply with the Comprehensive Plan.
I’m taking a brief break from cookie baking to post this info. I’m sure it’s entirely a coincidence that the August hearing was postponed until a time of year when so many people are engaged in activities other than reading testimony about this project.
The City’s Packet for the January 5th Planning Commission also includes a December 20th letter from Robert Gilham, describing the Smith family’s (the owner of the property @ 419 State Street) “longstanding connection to this site”. (Letter posted here also)
Let’s remember that the Smith family’s origins are from Ontario (OR), and as part of Eagle Newspapers’ operations in the 1960s through the late 1980’s, they bought a number of newspapers, including the Hood River News. As far as I’ve found, members of the Smith Family (Eagle Newspapers) had no connection with Hood River other than HRN ownership. Denny Smith, who took over Eagle Newspapers in 1968, seems to have lived in Salem for at least 40 years or more. ‘That was also where he lived when he served in Congress from 1981 to 1991.
Also remember that a letter describing the ways in which a project is compliant or may benefit the city doesn’t count as an answer to the specific concerns about the ways in which the project fails to comply with existing requirements in the municipal code, no matter how eloquently written.
Next Meeting: January 5 @ 5:30pm
https://cityofhoodriver.gov/administration/meetings/