Male victims of Fake Cases in India

09/10/2025

08/10/2025

13/09/2025

▪On 10 Sep 2025, Telangana HC granted anticipatory bail to a man accused of r**e by a woman known for filing multiple similar complaints. While granting bail to the petitioner charged u/s 64(1) BNS, Court observed, “the petitioner herein filed the past crime history of the complainant herein showing that she already implicated several persons with the similar allegations and that she is a married woman.”

▪The case arose out of an FIR registered at Moinabad Police Station, Cyberabad. The complainant alleged that she had been offered a job at a Consultancy and received an appointment letter. According to her, the accused, repeatedly insisted that she meet him. On 07.06.2025 and again on 08.06.2025, he allegedly pursued her through calls and WhatsApp chats.

▪On one such meeting, he brought another woman, who allegedly teased the complainant to enter into a relationship with him. On 11.06.2025, she claimed that he spiked her water and, throughout the night, s*xually assaulted her, forcing her to perform oral s*x.

▪The complainant further alleged that the accused promised marriage and permanent employment, although her contract was for one year. Later, he allegedly blackmailed her by showing a fake termination letter and demanded money, citing debts of one crore. She claimed that she later discovered, through colleagues, that he had similarly exploited other women and committed fraud.

▪The petitioner firmly denied the allegations and his counsel argued that he was being falsely implicated by a habitual complainant. The defence relied upon her past history, contending that “the complainant is a habitual complainant and filed similar false complaints against many other innocent persons and Haryana police had filed criminal cases against the complainant herein for the offences of extortion.”

▪Justice K. Sujana carefully examined the record and the rival submissions. The Court noted the material produced by the accused, showing that the complainant had implicated several others on similar grounds in the past. Accordingly, the Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused/petitioner.

▪Earlier, on 07 December 2022, in a case before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, the same complainant was denied bail in connection with FIR registered against her u/s 120B, 195A, 34, 384, 389 and 509 IPC at Gurugram.

▪The FIR, lodged by Archana Verma, alleged that the complainant attempted to trap her son by threatening him with false r**e charges.

▪The complainant stated that the woman made repeated telephone calls to her son and threatened that she would “involve him in a false r**e case as she had even earlier sent many boys to jail.” She, along with her mother and an accomplice, also visited their house to demand money for settlement. It was further alleged that she is a married woman, having married one Mahesh on 24.08.2021.

▪Justice Ashok Kumar Verma of the Punjab and Haryana HC observed, “the petitioner has filed as many as 9 FIRs against different persons and out of these 9 cases, in 3 cases proceedings under Section 182 IPC have been initiated against the petitioner as the allegations of these FIRs were found to be false… the petitioner is running racket for extortion of money from the persons against whom the allegations have been made by her.”

21/08/2025

In Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, 3 men ended their lives within a month due to harassment by their wives and in-laws. The reasons included persistent financial demands, extramarital affairs, and threats of false legal cases.

Case 1 – June 28, 2025 (Mayank Sharma)

On June 28, 2025, Mayank Sharma, 32, died by hanging at home. In his su***de note, he accused his wife, Deeksha, of having an affair with Sanjay Sahu. When confronted, Deeksha threatened to file a domestic violence case against him and his family. Police registered a case of abetment to su***de and arrested Deeksha and Sanjay.

Case 2 – July 15, 2025 (Arun Dubey)

On July 15, 2025, Arun Dubey, 40, a private sector employee living near the ITI area, set himself ablaze after pouring diesel on his body. During investigation, police found a su***de note stating that his wife, Priya, and her family had been pressuring him for ₹20 lakh and to sell his ancestral land to build a separate house.

They were married for 8 years and had a young daughter. Arun had already moved into a rented house to avoid disputes between Priya and his parents, but the pressure continued. Priya’s mother and brother frequently insisted he sell his land. During interrogation, Priya confessed to the demands. Police arrested her and her family based on the note and her statement.

Case 3 – July 24, 2025 (Neeraj)

On July 24, 2025, Neeraj, 35, who had married Pinky just 4 months earlier, consumed poison and died. His family alleged that Pinky and her relatives demanded money and that Neeraj suspected her of speaking to another man. When Neeraj confronted her about this, she left for her parental home. The same night, Neeraj consumed poison. Police arrested Pinky and her family for abetment to su***de.

***de

15/08/2025

▪In Agra, UP, a woman named Babli, who had previously been jailed for her husband’s murder and was out on bail, has now been arrested for strangling her father-in-law, Rajveer Singh, to death with the help of her lover, Prem Singh, and dumping his body in a field.

▪Six years ago, Babli murdered her husband, Hari Om, and was convicted in the case. She served 5 years and 4 months in prison, during which time her illicit relationship with Prem Singh came to light. Prem Singh, a resident of Mahal Badshahi village, is a habitual offender. In 2016, he was jailed in a r**e case. While out on bail, he murdered another woman’s husband in Firozabad due to an illicit relationship and was imprisoned again.

▪While in jail, Prem Singh met a woman accused in another case who was friends with Babli. At that time, Babli had no support from her family. She confided in the woman about her situation, and the woman suggested that Prem Singh could marry her since he was unmarried. Prem Singh later arranged for Babli’s bail, and she was released 11 months ago.

▪After her release, Babli returned to live at her in-laws’ house with her two daughters, aged 16 and 17. Relatives revealed that after Babli’s imprisonment, her 8-year-old son had died by su***de. Babli suspected that her in-laws had killed him and harbored a grudge against them. Two months ago, she moved to a rented house in Digner, taking her daughters with her.

▪Rajveer Singh, aged 70, wanted his granddaughters to return to the paternal home so they could be raised properly. He had even submitted a written request to the police seeking custody of the girls. However, Babli refused to send them back.

▪On 13 August 2025, Babli called her father-in-law Rajveer, claiming she wanted to resolve the family dispute. Rajveer agreed to meet her and left his home but never returned.

▪The next morning, at around 8 a.m., a villager, Prem Singh informed the police about a man’s body lying in a field. Since the deceased was not from the village, police alerted nearby stations to help identify him.

▪Soon after, Munni Devi from Agwar village arrived and identified the victim as her husband, Rajveer Singh. She informed police about Babli’s criminal history and alleged affair with Prem Singh, which she claimed was also the motive behind Rajveer’s killing.

▪Police investigations revealed that Babli and Prem Singh had conspired to lure Rajveer under the pretext of settling disputes. Once they met him, they strangled him to death and dumped his body in the field. Both accused have now been arrested, and further investigation is underway.

Agra police

UP Police

BJP Uttar Pradesh

14/08/2025

12/08/2025

▪In this case, the Rajasthan HC annulled a marriage after 12 years, holding that the wife’s concealment of schizophrenia before marriage amounted to fraud under the Hindu Marriage Act, and dismissed all the cases filed by the wife, including those for maintenance, domestic violence, and dowry harassment.

▪The appellant-husband, from Chittorgarh, and the respondent-wife, from Kota, were married in 2013. Shortly after the marriage, the husband noticed abnormal behaviour in his wife and found a psychiatrist’s prescription in her belongings, revealing her ongoing treatment for schizophrenia.

▪The husband alleged that the illness had existed prior to the marriage, was deliberately concealed by the wife’s family, and made consummation of the marriage impossible.

▪The wife denied suffering from any severe mental disorder, claiming instead that she had experienced “temporary depression” caused by an accident involving her mother and sister shortly before the marriage. She also accused her husband and in-laws of dowry demands and harassment.

▪Initially, the husband’s petition before the Kota Family Court was dismissed on 28 August 2019. Aggrieved, he filed an appeal before the Rajasthan HC.

▪The HC carefully reviewed witness statements, medical records, and other evidence. It concluded that “the wife had schizophrenia before marriage and was on medication. This was considered a ‘material fact’ for marriage, and hiding it was clear fraud under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act.”

▪Court observed that schizophrenia is not a temporary depressive state but “a severe mental disorder that, in its active stage, can prevent normal married life.” Referring to earlier Supreme Court decisions, Court held that such an illness directly impacts marital rights and is a relevant factor in determining the validity of a marriage.

▪Applying this legal principle, Court ruled that the marriage stood annulled from the very beginning “as if it had never taken place.”

▪Adv Umashankar Acharya, representing the husband, stated that this is “the only known case in Rajasthan where a divisional bench has simultaneously annulled a marriage and quashed all related criminal and financial cases.”

04/08/2025

Her Dad wanted a Dulha who has govt job & salary of 1 Lac per month

She dumped her BF of 3 yrs but slept with him night before marriage & conceived from him

How does ruining an innocent life come so easy to such women rather than revolting against her own parents?

13/07/2025

▪In Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, the Family Court ordered that a case be registered against a nurse u/s 383 of BNSS for filing a false affidavit by concealing her employment in order to claim maintenance from her husband.

▪The nurse, employed at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Lucknow, came into contact with a police constable. The two fell in love and eventually got married without any dowry.

▪After their marriage on 6 December 2020, the husband gifted his wife a scooty for her daily commute. However, soon after, disputes began to arise between the couple.

▪The husband alleged that his wife showed no respect towards his parents and relatives, stayed out late without informing anyone, and would insult him when questioned. Eventually, on 29 December 2021, she left the matrimonial home and went to live with her brother at her maternal home.

▪She later filed a complaint against her husband, accusing him of harassing her for dowry and alleging that he had demanded a car.

▪Subsequently, on 17 June 2022, she filed a petition in the Family Court demanding ₹30,000 per month as maintenance. In her affidavit, she claimed that she had no source of income or means to support herself.

▪However, during the court proceedings before Additional Principal Judge (Family Court) Krishna Kumar, the husband presented oral and documentary evidence.

▪He stated that his wife had previously worked as a nurse at a private medical college in Safedabad, prior to joining Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, and that she had completed a Junior Nursing and Midwifery course. When confronted with this evidence, the wife admitted to her employment history.

▪Based on the testimonies of witnesses and statements from both parties, the court found no merit in the wife’s allegations of dowry harassment. It observed that she had deliberately concealed her professional background in order to wrongfully claim maintenance.

▪As a result, Family Court dismissed her maintenance petition and ordered that a case be registered against her for filing a false affidavit and misleading the court.

30/09/2024

The Allahabad High Court criticized trial court judges for convicting defendants despite clear grounds for acquittal, primarily to avoid repercussions from the High Court !

Source: hindi.livelaw.in

30/09/2024