Just Right Media

02/09/2026

Artificial Intelligence—and Real Stupidity: Once again humanity is being threatened by an artificial existential crisis, this one actually containing the word artificial in it - presented to us in the form of artificial intelligence (AI).

As AI safety researcher Roman Yampolskiy expressed it to Patrick Bet-David last week, there is "a 99.999% chance that humanity will be destroyed by AI" and that government should be called in to control it. In these claims he is not alone, and is supported by the likes of AI researcher and founder of the AI safety company Conjecture, Connor Leahy.

Their calls for government controls are highly suspicious in light of their insistence that AI cannot possibly be controlled. However, upon reviewing the AI industry's poor returns on investment, British tech critic Ed Zitron offers us an insight to the true nature of the latest crisis.

In light of the bigger picture, one cannot help but notice how these and other AI experts are promoting the same agenda as did all of the Covid experts during the last existential crisis. In both cases it appears that the crisis is not existential, but financial.

To distract us from the real fiscal nature of the crisis, they have anthropomorphized the concept of AI into a human foe, using terms that cannot possibly be applicable to computer programs, no matter how sophisticated.

These computer experts speak about "AI agents" as entities that "don't care" about humanity, that can "lie, cheat, and steal," and that have "minds" as yet not understood by the experts themselves. The experts claim that AI agents can "want" to do things and are capable of being "convinced" by their own conclusions.

And perhaps the real stupidity underlying all of these artificial attributes is the argument that AI is capable of possessing them "...because the only thing (AI agents) care about is the reward."

One can only imagine what a "reward" might mean to a mechanical device or process, let alone how it could possibly "care" about getting this reward. The very idea is an absurdity.

"Artificial" can refer to something man-made or to something that is not real. When it comes to artificial intelligence it means both: man made and not real.

Until both terms - artificial and intelligence - are defined in a proper relevant context, the term artificial intelligence (or AI) will continue to enable those with sinister intentions to terrorize the populace - while forcing taxpayers to subsidize their financial misadventures.

Remember, just as big pharma was suffering declining revenues and returns on investment, an existential crisis threatening all of humanity via a novel virus requiring vaccines was created. And who bought all of the "vaccines" that weren't even vaccines? Why, governments of course. And thus their financial crisis was averted.

It seems to us that the AI industry is attempting the same strategy. Calling for governments to put "external pressure" on them to control AI, what they are really after is an external subsidy of taxpayer money to save them from their own existential financial crisis.

While we would like to believe otherwise, it's looking more and more as if there is a 99.999% probability that we could be Just Right.

Artificial can mean man-made or not real. When it comes to artificial intelligence it means both: man made and not real.

26/08/2026

MASTERDEBATION—debating debating: Moderated by Patrick Bet David, the four-hour-long August 14 debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson has been viewed and heard by hundreds of millions of people.

For his argument, 'master debater' Andrew Wilson asserted that the evidence proving that Tyler Robinson was the lone gunman responsible for shooting Charlie Kirk, was "overwhelming."

In contrast, blogger and YouTuber Candace Owens argued that the probability of Robinson having shot Kirk was "zero," and that the evidence she had accumulated led her to infer that Robinson may have been a "patsy."

While there were no issues resolved in the determination of Robinson's role, what made the debate worthy of note had little to do with the merits of the Kirk assassination, but a lot about the terms of the debate itself.

Insisting that Candace should be strictly limited to questioning the official narrative and to refrain from inferring any other narrative, Wilson simply refused to accept any evidence presented by Owens, even when she herself was a first hand witness.

What was clear is that Candace Owens fully understood the context, legal issues, and relevant facts underlying the Utah preliminary hearings, while Wilson knew next to nothing. Most embarrassingly, he insisted that Candace remove evidence from her own investigative time line because it created a narrative that would refute the official one.

As YouTuber Lionel Nation framed it: "We have to realize that Candace is sort of a journalist. (Wilson) wants her to release what's on her time line because he doesn't know what he's talking about. He doesn't understand or grasp the essence of what this is all about."

In the absence of any knowledge regarding the subject, Wilson turned the debate into an argument over the nature of inferences, what constitutes hearsay, the use of intuition, the legitimacy of sources, and of course, his objection to Candace's timeline on the grounds that it isn't 'official.'

For Wilson, the debate was an exercise in what could be called 'masterdebation.' In this context, he certainly proved himself to be a Master Debater - the kind who doesn't really need an opponent.

To add insult to injury, the self-identified 'libertarian Christian ethicist' Wilson saw himself as a defender of the Right: "I was willing to pay three hundred thousand dollars for this debate to finally demand that Candace be held accountable for the unbelievable theories and claims she's been making. Candace's investigations are indistinguishable from a Leftist operation. She couldn't be doing more damage to the Right if she were trying."

Sadly, throughout the entire debate, Andrew Wilson did not say a single thing or debate in a manner that could be considered Just Right in any sense of that term.

Candace Owens fully understood the context, legal issues, and relevant facts underlying the Utah preliminary hearings, while Andrew Wilson knew next to nothing.

19/08/2026

The paper trail—technology's path to freedom: "It is written."

With those words, both the authority and permanence of the written word was established.

This authority was based on the principle that whatever is written does not change with the passage of time, thanks primarily to the function of paper.

In an age where things are written or recorded in digitized formats, it is always easy to change or alter the original, and this has become a point of great concern. Changing, deleting, or altering documents and recordings of the past amounts to creating a false history.

In the digital virtual world, this process is made relatively effortless and can be used to advance current agendas incompatible with history's reality. We can see this clearly in the on-line 'fake news' narratives of the Left.

Of course, this is nothing new to our era. Even in the past when paper was the predominant medium on which records, stories, and other historical events were recorded, accounts of royalty, governments, and religious authorities destroying such records and re-writing the histories of their time are surprisingly common.

There are many on-line voices now emerging who are warning against today's destruction of historical records - from what 'is written' to what has been produced and recorded by other technologies, like music, movies, documentaries, television shows, films, videos, etc.

Together, they are urging the public to buy and preserve physical copies of paper books, and to own physical copies of other media, such as DVD discs, video tapes, audio tapes, vinyl recordings, hard drives, etc., even though dependent on older and changing technologies.

"Books are civilization's memories and once printed on paper cannot be changed," observes Glenn Beck, while King Trout expresses the same sentiment towards other technologies in physical form: "Physical media is not just about plastic discs, it's an archive of human history."

Like computers and other various technologies capable of recording or transmitting information, paper too is an advanced technology, one that happens to possess a significant advantage over the other technologies. What is written on paper cannot simply be changed or altered at the push of a button, or made obsolete due to changing technologies, or rendered inaccessible due to power outages.

That's what continues to make paper the medium that is Just Right for the establishment of any objective authority and physical permanence on which "it is written."

This authority was based on the principle that whatever is written does not change with the passage of time, thanks primarily to the function of paper.

12/08/2026

Bored of education—thanks to Boards of Education | Dave Annis: Now retired, Dave Annis was a teacher and vice-principal over a period of 25 years at the London Board of Education in London Ontario Canada. Coincidentally, Robert Vaughan was an elected education trustee for the same board.

Freed from the constraints of his past profession, Dave was able to compare notes with Robert on their experiences there, and some of their discoveries and revelations are both surprising and sinister.

While Dave reveals an education system captured by the ideology of the Left, from 'DEI' hiring practices to gender identity policies compelling teachers and administrators to acknowledge and reinforce 'non binary' sexual identities reported by students, Robert recounts how he was the only trustee who saw his task as one of ensuring "the best education at the lowest cost." Without exception, when asked, every other trustee saw their responsibility as a mission to "protect the education system."

Protecting a system that is incapable of even producing literate graduates able to read and write, and which dispenses diplomas to 100% of students regardless of their academic performance, is clearly a system that is using the students, not serving them.

When the pursuit of knowledge has been turned into a boring and repetitive exercise of memorizing useless and false information, it should not be surprising that more people than ever are abandoning so-called 'public' education. Alternatives abound. All that is necessary is to choose those that are Just Right for the individual students involved.

Many are abandoning state funded public education due to its boring and repetitive curriculum that dispenses useless information.

05/08/2026

Fauci's viral panic pandemic—may be contagious: With 111 'respectful declinations' to answer even a single simple question during the Senate hearing on July 29, Dr. Anthony Fauci certainly appeared to be in a severe state of panic.

He had every reason to decline testifying since he is involved in a criminal conspiracy that extends far beyond his own narrow role in that conspiracy. Nor do his declinations protect him from further legal consequences.

With validated documentation now released that demonstrates Fauci was knowingly lying and spreading false information about the so-called Covid 'vaccines' and prohibited 'gain of function' bio-weapon development, others connected to his activities may soon find themselves similarly compromised.

Worse, from the conspirators' point of view, the released information reveals direct connections between the fake Covid pandemic, the rigging of the 2020 election, the World Health Organization's singular mission of population control, the creation of bio-weapons, a system of criminal racketeering and money laundering, and an explicit conspiratorial strategy to overthrow the United States government.

As Dr. David Martin warned in his September 2025 address to the European parliament, "Until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering and murder - until we have that conversation - we're having the wrong conversation."

Given the repercussions of his now fully revealed criminal activities and connections, Fauci's state of panic may well become contagious as others in his direct line of co-conspirators are rounded up and given their own opportunities to decline making statements.

As far as we're concerned, if Fauci's viral panic pandemic proves to be contagious, that would be Just Right by us.

With 111 'respectful declinations' to answer even a single question during the July 29 Senate hearing, Dr Anthony Fauci was clearly in a severe state of panic.

29/07/2026

Democratic socialism—when democracy goes demoncrazy: The continuous rise in the popularity of socialism, coupled with a decline in the support of capitalism, is an ominous trend that if continued will lead to the end of both democracy and freedom in America.

Behind this trend is a group called the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) boasting a membership of more than 120,000 as of this month. Over 250 DSA members are said to be holding elected public office across 40 states, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, and New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani.

Calling for policies like single payer healthcare, the Green New Deal, tuition-free higher education, and for "social ownership and democratic control" of the American economy, everything about the DSA is the perfect formula for the death cult that describes all Leftist policies.

Among its other advocacies: publicly owned social housing, universal rent control, the legal protection of criminals, the demilitarization of police departments, the disempowering of police unions and the redirection of state funding to public services as steps towards fully abolishing the police and the prison system.

If any or all of this seems insane, it's because it is. As Steven Crowder phrased it, "the socialists and the DSA are functionally re****ed," while Harlem pastor James Manning labeled those who would vote for someone like Mamdani "crazy."

Indeed, the inability of most on the Left to even define the 'socialism' they pretend to support or to define the 'fascism' they pretend to oppose attests to this functionally re****ed state of mind. After all, the very concept of 'democratic socialism' is a contradiction in terms.

Democracy and socialism cannot coexist. Those who do not understand this either don't know the definition of democracy, or of socialism, or of both. In fact, by their own public statements, socialists do not seem to understand the meanings of any political terms.

This might explain why Mamdani once declared that "If you have more than one socialist in a room and there isn't disagreement, then you don't have more than one socialist in a room."

And while socialists may argue among themselves over the spoils of their confiscated wealth from the productive, the one thing they all share in common is their mutual hatred of capitalism, ironically yet another term they cannot define.

In explaining the common psychology underlying this hatred, YouTuber Asmongold recently put it this way:

"Capitalism is an acknowledgement that you are a failure of your own design. The reason you don't have what you want is because you're not smart enough, you haven't put in enough work or you haven't come up with a good enough idea to earn that thing. Capitalism is accountability. Socialism/communism is group consensus accountability and nobody ever gets held accountable for doing right or wrong. Ever. And that's it."

Socialists have never understood the process of wealth creation, partly because they operate on an economic fallacy called the fixed pie theory - the idea that what exists is all that there is. Thus for those incapable of producing or creating new wealth, stealing from those who do know how to create wealth is seen as the only solution to their immediate needs.

The notion that some people can be helped by confiscating the wealth of others must be rejected. After all, it is that very wealth which, when invested in productive enterprise by those who earned it, will provide the means and opportunities necessary to make self-sufficiency an achievable goal for all.

To describe socialism in a way that is Just Right, one must understand that in all of its manifestations throughout history, socialism is a continual war on wealth and prosperity, two conditions it has never been able to create or maintain.

Those who do not understand that democracy and socialism cannot coexist do not know the definition of either or both terms.

22/07/2026

Saving America—through electoral integrity: With Donald Trump's July 16 address to the nation, the significance of America's electoral integrity issue has taken on an entirely new dimension.

In particular, he has shifted attention away from any past claims of 'stolen election' narratives towards his release of thousands of verifiably genuine documents demonstrating criminal corruption of various members within America's intelligence agencies.

Called "the biggest expose in American history" by some observers, Trump's clear, articulate, and powerful address was buoyed by a second powerful address delivered by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Rubio delivered a remarkable and highly philosophical assessment of the violence generated by the Left: "Radical Leftism may wear various slogans and ideologies across place and time - anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist, communist, anarchist, Marxist - but the fundamental character is always the same: a poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of equality, justice, and liberation - an overwhelming need to tear down what greater men have built.

"This is a distinctive and unique evil, driven above all else by a deep hatred of civilization itself. It is perpetrated by those who cannot build, cannot create, cannot achieve great things, and take their revenge upon the world for their own inadequacy by seeking to destroy those who can."

Between identifying the corruption within America's electoral process and identifying the psychological motives behind the actions of the Left, both revelations will have a powerful effect on the narrative surrounding electoral integrity.

With the likes of Trump and Rubio working together to Save America, we could be looking at a team that is Just Right for doing the job.

With Trump's latest address to the nation, the significance of the electoral integrity issue has taken on an entirely different dimension.

15/07/2026

Just Right 973 - Sound it out—the failure of state education: The dumbing down of the Anglosphere was no accident. With 'public education' primarily monopolized by governments, this should come as no surprise because most of those governments are on the Left.

In their hands, state education is a powerful tool to indoctrinate students with false histories, moral relativism, and Marxist ideologies. As Marx himself noted, "People deprived of their history are easily persuaded."

And in addition to all the propaganda, there is an alarm being raised about the degree of outright illiteracy among Western populations, coupled with an abandonment of a common moral standard and of individual responsibility.

Immersed in school systems that promote cultures of victimhood based on a false polarity of the oppressor versus the oppressed, today's youth have become outright socialists, communists and fascists, incapable of relating to the values that allow them the freedom to express their hatred of freedom and capitalism.

Perhaps the most difficult to understand failure of state education is how and why so many people are able to 'graduate' from state schools utterly unable to read or write.

Blame it on a 'philosophy' called 'Whole Language.'

If that term is unfamiliar, it could be because there are so many variants of this language ideology that most are unaware of its problematic existence.

Over the years, variants of 'Whole Language' have been promoted as universal instruction, the visual method, look-and-say, whole word, word method, sight reading, top-down, whole-to-part, top-to-bottom, real books, the Aldine Method, the Scott Foresman Method, whole language, psycholinguistics, the alternative approach and graphophonics, among many others.

The reason for all the labels is to disguise the fundamental fact that none of these methods are effective at teaching people how to read. And that's exactly how state educators want it.

The hostility displayed by public educators towards the use of phonics in the teaching of reading speaks to a deeply sinister agenda. Since reading fluency empowers the individual and independence, state educators do everything they can to create an illiterate society incapable of critical thinking.

The public must hold its politicians and educational institutions accountable for the dismal state of education today. That effort can begin by teaching our public educators to sound it out for themselves: phonics is the best and proven way to teach reading in a way that is Just Right.

08/07/2026

Just Right 972: I pencil—You eraser: On the heels of America's 250th anniversary as an independent free nation, the incredible rise in the popularity of socialism and communism within the American political culture has caused many to question whether or not the ideal around which America was founded has all but been extinguished.

At the heart of this cultural shift to the Left sits a popular acceptance of the ideology of collectivism, generally seen as socialism, coupled with a popular rejection of the philosophy of individualism, again, generally seen as capitalism.

Because both socialism and capitalism have been predominantly defined by the Left, each is perceived as a 'system' - whether political or economic. In fact only socialism is a system, while capitalism represents a 'condition' free of systematic encumbrances.

To illustrate this principle, Leonard E. Read, founder of the Foundation for Economic Education, published an essay in 1958 entitled 'I, Pencil' in which he clearly demonstrated how no single individual, group, or central planner is capable of producing something as simple as a pencil.

And yet, pencils exist, thanks to what some might understand as the 'invisible hand of the marketplace,' but which is in fact a very visible process when attention is called to its particulars.

As podcaster Glenn Beck recently put it: "Here's the key: No one was in charge. So if no one is smart enough to plan a pencil, who is smart enough to plan an entire economy?

"Socialism says people at the top are wise enough to run your life. Capitalism says something much humbler and far more radical: nobody's that wise - not king, committee, computer, nobody..."

Of course, this is the last thing that those on the Left want to hear or acknowledge. As the erasers of all things Right, they do everything possible to erase such knowledge from the pages of history, metaphorically using the very pencils they are incapable of creating to do so.

When the simple perception of how a pencil comes into being is so threatening to socialists and those on the Left, you can bet that they themselves know that there are no arguments or evidence that can sustain their ideology.

Because socialism invariably leads to poverty death and destruction while capitalism sustains life and creation, it is paramount that the understanding of these distinctions is not just explained or intellectually understood, but directly perceived in a way that is Just Right.

On Canada Day 2026, Mark Carney celebrates a 'post-national' Canada while most feel they're reading the country's obituary. A powerful look at how the pursuit of the 'greater good' is dismantling the nation.