HOMA BAY MEDIA CLUB

  • Home
  • HOMA BAY MEDIA CLUB

HOMA BAY MEDIA CLUB Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from HOMA BAY MEDIA CLUB, .

06/04/2013

A 39 year old man alleged to have r***d a Nursing student during violence in Homa Bay town has been arraigned in court.



James Omoke Mwongwasi appeared before Homa Bay Senior Resident Magistrate Paul Mayova to answer charges of allegedly ra**ng a 22 year old Nursing student contrary to Sexual Offences Act.



The Court was told that the accused intentionally and unlawfully had carnal knowledge of the student by use of threats on the night of March 30 and 31 this year at Hippo Buck area in Homa bay town.



The accused faced an alternative count of committing an indecent act with an adult by intentionally and unlawfully touching her private parts against her will.



The court heard that on the same day, at about 6.00pm, the complainant was going to report on duty at Homa Bay District Hospital where she was undergoing internship before she met a group of men walking along the road.



Mr Mwongwasi informed her that there was a riot ahead of her way since the area residents were protesting against the Supreme Court’s ruling hence she would not be able to arrive at the hospital.

The accused took advantage of the prevailing situation to lure the lady into his house, masquerading to give her protection during the difficult moment.



However, at about midnight, the accused pulled the complainant from where she was sleeping, deprived her of a mobile phone, forced her into his bedroom and threatened assault before ra**ng her severally.



After getting her phone back, the lady sent a text message to her colleagues in the Hospital and tipped the police who rescued her.



The accused denied the charges and was granted a bond of shs 300,000 with surety of similar amount or cash bail of shs150, 000.



He was remanded after failing to raise the bond. The case is scheduled for hearing on May 6 this year.



The complainant is a student in one of the Medial colleges in Nyanza Province.



Two losers for Homa Bay County Ward representative have filed petitions to challenge the last General election results in their respective wards.

Isaiah Odak Onyango and Fredrick Otieno Nyagowa have filed petitions in the office of Homa Bay Court Chief Magistrate Patricia Gichohi to challenge results which were announced by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) in their repective wards in Kasipul Constituency.

Mr Onyango filed a case challenging election Isaiah Odera’s victory as the ward representative for West Kasipul.

In a different petition, Fredrick Otieno Nyagowa is challenging the election of Isaiah Opap as the ward representative of West Kamagak.

In the petitions filed through their Lawyer Samwel Nyauke, the two accused the winners in their respective wards, Kaspul Returning Officer and IEBC of flawed electoral process.

They argued that the two County ward representatives were declared winners even though the election that was conducted on March 4 was marred with irregularities.

As a proof of flawed elections, the petitioners said tallying of votes was deliberately meddled with to give their respective competitors unfair lead over them.

They added that their agents were denied by the IEBC officials to sign the election results tallying sheets (forms 35).

They further blamed the Returning Officer and the IEBC of failing to take care while scrutinizing the votes cast.

The petioners demanded the scrutiny and recount of ballot papers be done with respect to all candidates who participated in the election.

They were also praying for their declaration as winners should the recount of the ballot papers prove them to be leading with valid votes.

The petitioners demanded that the cost of their petitions be met by the respondents.

23/03/2013

The Supreme Court battles challenging the declaration of Jubilee leader Uhuru Kenyatta as president-elect hold the potential for several legal surprises.

No less than three petitions have been filed over the outcome of the March 4 General Election, with a CORD campaign official and a civil society group seeking to have the election nullified.

The six judges in the court are expected to consider these along with written responses from electoral officials and the Jubilee team.

The merits of the cases cannot be argued in public, but observers are already casting an eye as to the possible outcomes and their implications for the parties in the contest.

Legal, election and political experts say some of the possible permutations have serious implications for Jubilee, CORD and the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC). They could prove a shock for voters as well, after the country conducted peaceful elections since the 2007/2008 post-poll violence.

Experts we spoke to listed at least four possible scenarios, with some minor variations. These depend on how the court rules on key issues such as the integrity of the voters’ register, the accuracy of the counting and tallying, the impact of other irregularities and how various types of rejected votes affect the threshold for victory.

However, judges have leeway to give any other orders they see fit as the evidence before them may lead to conclusions observers have not anticipated.

Scenario I

The court upholds the IEBC verdict that proclaimed Uhuru winner of the March 4 presidential election. This is likely if the judges find that the results are valid. It is also possible if they find the results incorrect due to tallying errors or to the inclusion of some or all of the rejected votes, but the changes do not affect the threshold for a first round win.
Scenario II

The court partially grants CORD its prayers to overturn IEBC’s decision by declaring that the conditions for a victory were not met, but those for a run-off were. This is possible if the judges find tallying errors that lower Uhuru’s total to below the 50 per-cent plus one vote threshold, after finding the rest of the election was credible and having resolved the question of how to treat some or all of the rejected votes.

Scenario III

The court orders a recount of votes in selected areas. This is possible if the court is satisfied the voters’ register and the voting process were credible, but finds evidence of major flaws in the counting and tallying. The outcome of a recount, taken alongside a decision on how to treat some or all rejected votes, would likely determine whether victory would be declared for Uhuru or a run-off ordered within 30 days.

Scenario IV

The court rules that the entire electoral process was flawed, making it difficult to determine who won the presidential race, and orders a re-run of the race in 60 days, as required by law.

This is possible if evidence is presented that shows the voter register was flawed, the counting and tallying massively manipulated, the IEBC and its officials complicit in voter fraud or both electronic and manual processes flawed.

Until all evidence before the Supreme Court is scrutinised for its veracity and impact on the outcome, there is no telling which scenario is most likely. Whatever the outcome, says, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) in Kenya, executive director George Kegoro the ruling will be historic.

“The country is divided down the middle and the judges are acutely aware of the strained inter-ethnic relations,” Mr Kegoro says.

“Trust in the judicial and electoral processes will depend on the quality of the ruling,” Kegoro says.
Chief Justice W***y Mutunga, the president of the Supreme Court, will hear the petitions alongside Justices Smokin Wanjala, Philip Kiptoo Tunoi, Mohamed Khadhar Ibrahim, Justice Jacton B Ojwang’ and Lady Justice Njoki Ndung’u.

Kegoro predicts the final verdict will be based on any of the three factors: misconduct or mistakes by IEBC, misconduct by political players or a mix of both. If the errors or irregularities are too minor to matter, the petition may entirely be dismissed. If the errors are more severe, a fresh presidential poll may be ordered or a full (or select) recount to determine the winner. The last two options present a fresh challenge of public faith in the re-run or runoff.

“If the electoral commission is to blame (for major misdeeds) and the blame is extensive, then it will be difficult for it to run a repeat election,” says the ICJ chief executive.

In worst-case scenario, a battle could erupt over inviting a third party to conduct the elections or attempting to reconstitute IEBC.

Sufficient days

Former vice-chairman of the defunct Electoral Commission of Kenya Gabriel Mukele, a lawyer, argues that the 14 days provided in the Constitution for the Supreme Court to hear presidential petition may not be sufficient. He also sees some outcomes as possibly complicated for IEBC.

“If IEBC is (found) criminally responsible (for voter fraud), it puts the country at the risk of unrest,” he says. He rules out the possibility of the United Nations stepping in, as has been proposed by a section of CORD elected leaders, and says disbanding the commission would be “useless”. “To restore confidence, we can hire people with experience on a temporary basis.”

International Foundation for Electoral Systems’ (IFES) chief co-ordinator for Kenya and Uganda Michael Yard says a presidential re-run or run-off would be easier for IEBC or any other electoral body to execute, as there will only be two choices to make. Both present different legal and logistical encumbrances, with a run-off due in 30 days and a rerun in 60 days.

A lawyer who spoke on condition of anonymity says the National Assembly and Senate, which begin sittings next week – their calendar is not tied to the Executive’s – could amend the law and Constitution to buy more time for a repeat exercise.

That, he says, would necessitate an extension of President Kibaki’s tenure or other caretaker arrangements like a government of national unity.
Mr Mukele, however, points out that the legislation process faces challenges, as there are sections of the Constitution that require a referendum to change.

The Supreme Court, he says, would likely offer a way out if it settled on a run-off or re-run, having considered the evidence that led to that conclusion
Mr Mukele, however, points out that the legislation process faces challenges, as there are sections of the Constitution that require a referendum to change.

20/03/2013

Halloo Fellow kenyans? Enjoy your night wherever you are and let God shower you with his blessing throughout your life. Good night!!!!!

19/03/2013

Haloo fellow kenyans. We have noted with concern that there are some people who are still tied to tribal discrimination, eventhough kenya is a lovely peaceful country. Without all these beautiful natural resources in kenya, no tourist could be seen

18/03/2013

KENYANS DESERVE PEACE NOMATTER THE PENDING DEMOCRATIC ISSUES RECENTLY FILLED IN COURT. PLIZ PLIZ MY FELLOW KENYANS STOP INSULTING OTHER COMMUNITIES OR TRIBS. REMEMBER THAT NO ONE APPLIED TO BE BORN IN A GIVEN TRIBE OR COMMUNITY. WE ARE ALL KENYANS AND REMAIN SO EVEN AFTER ELECTIONS OR POST ELECTION. OUR LEADERS DO GO AND THE LAND OF KENYA HAS TO REMAIN FOR ANOTHER GENERATION. YOUR CHILDREN, MY CHILDREN AND GRAND GRDAND CHILDREN, CALL IT, LET US ALL SET OUR MINDS TO THE VISION 2030 AND 2050. THANK YOU ALL AND GOD BLESS YOU FOR MAINTAINIG PEACE BEFORE AND AFTER ELECTION. WE HOPE EVERYTRHING WILL BE TRACKED BACK TO THE NORMAL WAY

18/03/2013

HALLLOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Address


Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when HOMA BAY MEDIA CLUB posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share