Weird Movies

Home
Weird Movies

Watch out for amazing videos on here. Feed backs and comments will be highly welcomed. Its a video c

10/05/2025

Can u imagine their thoughts on Africans.
🇧🇫

10/05/2025

Can u imagine their thoughts on Africans.

🇧🇫

07/05/2025

EFCC’s Case Against Martins Innocent Otse: A Controversial Arrest and Unanswered Questions

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has issued a statement defending its investigation of Martins Innocent Otse, a suspect accused of financial crimes based on multiple petitions. However, disturbing details surrounding his arrest contradict the agency’s official narrative and raise serious concerns about legality, transparency, and possible abuse of power.

The Contradictory Narratives
1. EFCC’s Claim vs. Eyewitness Accounts
The EFCC insists Otse ignored several invitations before his lawful arrest, supported by a Remand Order, and states that administrative bail has been offered. However, eyewitnesses—including Otse’s friend who was briefly detained—report a violent and irregular apprehension:
- Otse was kidnapped in broad daylight after assisting his mother at a bank.
- The assailants, unidentified and without official tags, claimed to be DSS operatives but later turned out to be EFCC.
- He was allegedly beaten before being whisked away, a detail absent from the EFCC’s sanitized press release.
Human rights lawyer VDM Lawyal, who is assisting Otse, has not seen any bail documents, directly contradicting the EFCC’s claim that bail was offered.

2. A Pattern of Questionable Arrests?
The EFCC acknowledges Otse’s past criticisms of the agency but denies retaliation. Yet, the clandestine nature of his arrest—akin to an abduction—fuels suspicions of punitive action rather than procedural law enforcement.
If the EFCC indeed made the arrest, why did operatives hide their identities and initially pose as DSS? This tactic mirrors past incidents where security agencies conducted extrajudicial pickups to avoid scrutiny.

3. Legal and Ethical Implications
- Remand Order Validity: While the EFCC cites a Remand Order, its failure to produce bail paperwork to Otse’s lawyers undermines its credibility.

Check Comment for continuation...
,

06/05/2025

Wow! Allegedly, seems to be compromising all of a sudden.

,

05/05/2025

Follow for bout updates and get educated.
,

05/05/2025

Man seen preparing to stop working in GT bank.
,

02/05/2025

If u know u know! Even the life of the citizens is politics for them.

,

02/05/2025

Legal Implications of EFCC and GT Bank's Actions in VDM's Detention

The reported detention of VDM (name withheld) by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), with the alleged cooperation of Guaranty Trust Bank (GTB), raises significant legal concerns under Nigerian law. Here’s a breakdown of the potential violations and legal consequences:

1. Arrest and Detention Procedures
- EFCC’s Compliance with Due Process: The EFCC is empowered under the EFCC Act 2004 to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. However, arrests must comply with constitutional safeguards:
- Section 35 of the 1999 Constitution**: Guarantees the right to personal liberty and prohibits arbitrary detention. An arrest must be based on reasonable suspicion or a valid warrant, and detainees must be charged to court within 48 hours.
- If VDM was held without prompt arraignment or clear justification, the detention could be deemed unlawful, exposing the EFCC to litigation for fundamental rights violations.

- VDM’s Refusal to Meet Visitors: While detainees have the right to legal representation under Section 36(6)(c) of the Constitution, VDM’s refusal to see anyone (including lawyers) may complicate claims of rights infringement unless coercion is proven.

2. GT Bank’s Role in the Arrest
- Alleged Complicity: If GTB facilitated the arrest by confining VDM in its premises (e.g., locking him inside the exit door), this could amount to:
- False Imprisonment: A tort under common law, defined as unlawful restraint of a person’s freedom of movement.
- Violation of Customer Rights: Banks owe customers a duty of care and protection under the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Consumer Protection Framework. Colluding to detain a client without legal basis breaches this duty.
- Potential Liability: GTB could face civil suits for damages, regulatory sanctions from the CBN, or reputational harm.

3. Legal Recourse for VDM
- Fundamental Rights Enforcement: VDM’s legal team may file a suit under Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 for breaches of Sectio

02/05/2025

Activist VDM Reportedly Detained by EFCC Without Warrant

Reports claim activist VDM was taken by EFCC officials today while helping his mother with banking issues. No warrant was allegedly presented.

This raises critical questions about due process and treatment of government critics. Constitutional protections matter for everyone.

Why This Matters:
- Potential due process violations
- Concerns about targeting vocal critics
- Importance of accountability

Take Action:
- Demand transparency on VDM's status
- Share verified information only
- Stay vigilant about civil liberties

When one person's rights are threatened, everyone's rights become vulnerable.

Address

Website

facebook.com

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Weird Movies posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Address
Alerts
Claim ownership or report listing
Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Country:

City: