11/04/2024
Some interesting thoughts on Altered States from William Hurt…
William Hurt on "Altered States" (1980): "I was jumping out of my skin because Paddy Chayefsky was articulating ideas that were so far ahead of their time. Molecular biology and quantum physics, the sources of altruism, the notion of love over truth. I had been thinking about the beginnings of our current situation, intellectual property in bio-engineering, I had been thinking about computers and all that. And then I read this script and I was in a Cuban coffee shop up on 78th and Amsterdam and I couldn't stop reading it and I couldn't stop weeping for about half an hour and I couldn't stand up for 45 minutes because it was every idea that I had been thinking about. Everything was in this thing."
Hurt didn't want to star in the movie himself but really wanted to convince writer Chayefsky to make it anyway, because "the ideas had to get out." So he "took the script away for two weeks, memorized every word, worked on the entire structure of the entire thing, every scene," and went in after two weeks. Hurt says that "Fifty-nine minutes and 30 seconds later," he stood up and went like, "That's why I think you have to make it. And I'm going." But at that point, {director Arthur Penn], Chayefsky, and [producer Howard Gottfried] went in a corner and started talking; after they were done, they told him they would have made the movie only if he was in it. So, Hurt did; it was his film debut.
Hurt says that he knew just a little about director Ken Russell prior working with him, and just because he had seen his movies. About his first meeting with Russell, Hurt said in an interview, "We were in this little room and there was this radiator and a little desk and a chair and we didn't sit for a half an hour, neither one of us. Finally he sat on a radiator and I sat on the floor. When he sat on the radiator his pants pulled up and I saw he had Betty Boop socks on. It was then I thought, 'I'll do it'."
"A lot of what we do as actors now, it simply isn't acting. Because you can't get a script at 11 o'clock at night and shoot at 9 o'clock the next morning and call that acting. You can call that being well-used by a director. You can call it being a wonderful reflection of what your teachers instilled in you over the years and years of hopeful study. But you can't call it personal participation in the work. You can call it showing up in terror."