22/03/2024
PAPUA NEW GUINEA A CONFESSIONAL STATE?
Catholic Reporter PNG - March 2024 (revised)
Fr. Giorgio Licini
The move to declare Papua New Guinea a Christian Country and a Christian State appears commendable only at first glance. With the first amendment (here in brackets) the Preamble of the Constitution will open with the words,
We, the People of Papua New Guinea,
• united in one nation [acknowledge and declare God the Father, Jesus Christ, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, as our Creator and the Sustainer of the entire universe and the source of our Powers and Authorities, delegated to the people and all persons within the geographical jurisdiction of Papua New Guinea];
Along with other smaller amendments also in the Preamble, in the Fifth Goal, in the Basic Social Obligations, in Section 1 and Section 3, this effectively turns Papua New Guinea into a confessional State. “A confessional State is a State which officially recognizes and practices a particular religion, usually accompanied by a public cult, and at least encourages its citizens to do likewise” (Wikipedia).
In the past, confessional States were common in the Christian world, always endorsing a particular Christian denomination and Church: Catholic (Italy, Spain, Austria, etc.), Anglican (England), Orthodox (Russia). There are now very few surviving Christian confessional States with some, like England (where the King is the Head of the Church), practically embracing full religious pluralism. There are also several Muslim confessional States, especially in the Middle East, or Buddhist like Thailand, or Jewish like Israel. Opposite to that, some countries, like China, promote an atheistic identity of the State with strong limitations on faith communities and some particular religious tenets (the authority and role of the Pope in religious matters, for example, in regard to the Catholic Church).
The confessional State normally extends a larger or smaller degree of freedom to other religious communities or Churches present, active or trying to come within its borders. So, Christianity, like any other religion, is totally prohibited in Saudi Arabia but allowed in Thailand or Israel; and similar situations occur in other countries with a State religion. What is common among all, however, is that normally the highest positions of the State are precluded to the citizens members of religious minorities. The confessional State effectively establishes a group of second-class citizens by excluding them from the top political and administrative responsibilities, particularly that of Head of State (Governor General in the case of PNG), prime minister, commander in chief of the armed forces, chief justice, etc. The Muslim countries are quite rigid about this. The Christian confessional States are generally more flexible but have their own red lines. In the case of Israel, never will a non-Jewish person assume a State position.
The proposed changes in the PNG Constitution leave two big questions open. First. In a confessional PNG, will a non-Christian still be allowed to run for provincial governor, be elected Speaker of the House, possibly become Prime Minister or Governor General? Or will all these and possibly other positions be restricted to “Christians” alone? Second. With such amendments the State allows itself to define the concept of “Christian” and “Christianity”, possibly including or excluding beliefs, practices, books, groups, churches and promoting its own initiatives.
A clear example of a first confessional State practice in PNG was the signing of what is called a New Covenant, “Between the God of Israel, Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit and the People of Papua New Guinea” by then Prime Minister Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare on 26 August 2007 at the Sione Kami Memorial Church in Boroko, NCD. This was followed in 2011, under Prime Minister Peter O’Neill, by the institution of a Day of Repentance on the same date of the 26th of August every year. These were government initiatives, probably resulting from lobbying by particular groups, touching on the moral and religious sphere of the citizens, not necessarily negative, but established independently from institutional Church and religion.
Such role by the State should be carefully pondered and probably excluded. In Papua New Guinea dozens of versions of Christianity are active. Common celebrations and practices are to be treasured. But particular and individual choices must also be guaranteed. The Constitution is not only about what a nation wants to be, but also about what it wants to avoid and prevent down the line.
We remain of the opinion that the PNG Constitution is good as it has been since 1975 with its Melanesian values and perspectives expressed in the National Goals and Directive Principles. Should it be transformed into the Constitution of a confessional State, the discrimination of non-Christian citizens or even citizens whose Christianity differs from that of the ruling government is likely to occur. The proposed Constitutional amendments in Papua New Guinea open the doors to the government and the State to decide which particular version of Christianity is proper for PNG; something that runs against Sec 45.3 of the Constitution. The transformation of a secular State into a confessional one only comes as a result of an alteration rather than an amendment of the Constitution.
22 March 2024