A Marxist publication of revolutionary strategy, history, and critique - dedicated to the advancement of scientific socialism. From the fields to the stars! đđ«
15/01/2025
đ„ïž NEW ARTICLE đ»
Gary Levi analyzes the nature of speculative investment bubbles in the tech industry and conjectures on the likely direction that labor struggles will take in response to the coming crash of the AI frenzy.
Rudy joins Miguel GĂłmez for a discussion of his new book on the CNT's approach (theoretical and practical) to political economy and economic planning.
We discuss the economic program of the CNT, the Spanish anarchist trade union, during the Civil War period.
27/12/2024
Elia Newsom reflects on the struggles and successes they experienced teaching a university course on socialism during the Fall 2023 semester at the University of Colorado Boulder.
20/12/2024
Bluebird argues that Donald Trump's recent presidential victory has planted the seeds of a Bonapartist state and, as a result, the end of US bourgeois democracy may be in sight.
17/12/2024
Amelia, Carlos, and Rudy sit down for the follow-up episode on the Mexican revolution to discuss the consolidation of the revolutionary state with a focus on the figure of LĂĄzaro CĂĄrdenas.
We discuss the consolidation of the revolutionary state after the Mexican Revolution with a focus on the figure of LĂĄzaro CĂĄrdenas.
04/12/2024
New episode: We join Aidan Beatty for a discussion on Gerry Healy, the wider political atmosphere in Britain he grew up in and operated within and also talk about the topic of cults on the left.
We join Aidan Beatty to discuss his recent book The Party is Always Right: The Untold Story of Gerry Healy and British Trotskyism.
Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Cosmonaut posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?
Share
Mission Statement
The anarchist Mikhail Bakuninâboth a political rival of Marx in the First International and translator of the first Russian edition of Capital, Vol. Iâonce mocked the intellectualism of his Marxist opponents by quipping âwe have too many ideas and not enough actionâ.
Today the situation seems to be the opposite. Direct action after direct action, dedicated leftists put their bodies on the line without anything resembling a convincing vision of a better world. This is no one individualâs failure, but an inevitable result of the collapse of working-class power and socialist politics in the late 20th century. Communismâthe vision of humanity emancipated from class societyâis generally disregarded as a fantasy, or even as undesirable in principle. At best it is the silent God of a negative theology, a desperate mantra of abstract negation with no plausible hope to be found in the existing tendencies of capitalist society. Consigned by post-structuralism and marginalist economics to an obsolete micro-niche in humanities departments, academic marxismâeven on the rare occasion it can genuinely help us understand the worldâis as detached from the goal of classless society on paper as it is in reality. A leftist politics this disoriented is about as likely to achieve basic democratic reforms as it is to implement a world socialist republic.
To orient ourselves in a direction towards universal human emancipation, we must rebuild the approach of scientific socialism. While the term âscientific socialismâ has historically become synonymous with Soviet state ideologyâand if the name Lysenko rings any bells, the most rankly opportunistic pseudoscienceâwe believe that it is a concept worth upholding. Peddling ideological snake oil to a desperate public does nothing to change the world and advance humanity. Abstract ideals about the way things ought to be do not suffice when the agents of capitalâthe capitalists, their state, their ideologuesâuse all scientific means at their disposal. Marx and Engels created scientific socialism to argue for a socialism based in reasonâa socialism with a rigorous analysis of both existing material conditions and history, with an eye towards how to use the best of humanityâs capacities to transform the world. They developed their ideas through critique and deliberation with the socialists of their time who had internalized capitalist ideology or failed to make their visions politically possible. In this process, Marx and Engels developed not only a Marxist political strategy, but also a materialist conception of history thatâif used properlyâis a weapon for the proletariat in its struggle for communism.
Therefore it is necessary for Marxists of all backgrounds and skills to develop intellectual institutions independent of academia, wherein communists can develop their vision, strategy, and overall critique of capitalist society. Cosmonaut aims to be one of (what should be) many different platforms of debate, where scientific socialists can develop an analysis of history, critique the prevailing ideological âcommon senseâ of our time, and conceive a programmatic communist politics relevant to our circumstance.
Because no one genius will figure out all the answers to the questions facing revolutionaries, we must understand that knowledge is a collective process of debate and deliberation. So while we aim to stand as close as possible to the programmatic communist commitments of Marx and Engels, we reject an approach that divines the definitive âred threadâ tradition as an abstract set of principles to follow and evangelize. We seek to develop a Marxism for the 21st century which will be based on a scientific inquiry of history and present conditions through a process of collective discussion and debate, not dogma based on fidelity to what this or that Great Man said so many years ago. Our organizing principles are internationalism over all standing armies and borders; building class-independent, democratic institutions; and a vision of a future where the world is a classless community of humanity, finally free of exploitation and oppressionâcommunism.