আমার কাগজ আজকাল -My Today's Newspaper

23/11/2025

A report from Outlook ...
https://www.facebook.com/share/1H4rGjkZr7/

22/11/2025

Red flagship in the crossroads!
https://www.facebook.com/share/1Zugtn7noM/

The recent surrenders of senior Maoist leaders Mallojula Venugopal and Aasanna have provoked a complex debate about the political meaning of capitulation. For the movement that once proclaimed itself the revolutionary vanguard of India’s oppressed classes, this development is not unexpected. The government branded Maoism as a law and order problem; its efforts are a new phase in the counterinsurgency campaign – and a turning point in the dialectic of revolutionary politics.

Surrender, when viewed through a Marxist-Leninist lens, is not a tactical withdrawal or a personal choice. It’s a symptom of a deeper crisis of political imagination. The question is not why individuals surrender but why a movement that claims a historical mission toward revolution reached such a point of dissolution, instead of crafting alternative modes of political survival.

The Naxalbari uprising of 1967, emerging from a sense of disillusionment with parliamentary gradualism, had quickly evolved into a political organisation that differed from the existing Left parties of the time. It was hailed by its founders as India’s Jinggangshan – a red base in the making. Over the decades, the movement spread across central India’s tribal belt, adopting the strategy of sustaining a protracted people’s war. Its ideology rested on characterising India as a semi-feudal, semi-colonial society – a formulation borrowed from Mao Zedong’s analysis of 1930s China.

Read more on thewire.in

18/11/2025

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BfyMBCkTs/

18/11/2025

https://aje.io/qam4vh

Philippine president faces accusation of chronic drug use amid a major corruption scandal over flood-control projects.

18/11/2025

A good news...
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1GLTaAm7e5/

13/11/2025

Great news for Communist Wings...

A Zohran Mamdani-loving member of the Communist Party has been elected to a local council in upstate New York.

27/10/2025

When justice became mockery!
https://www.facebook.com/100080641114033/posts/857522026945827/?app=fbl

The Supreme Court today took a dim view of the Delhi Police’s failure to respond to the bail pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima and Meeran Haider in the controversial ‘larger conspiracy’ case of the 2020 northeast Delhi riots. All four have been in jail for upwards of five years at this point.

Additional solicitor general Suryaprakash V. Raju asked for time to file a counter affidavit, leading the bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and N.V. Anjaria to say that the police had had enough time to reply and that in bail matters, especially, there is no situation where a counter appeal is filed.

“Last time, if you remember, we said in open court that we will hear the matter on [October] 27 and we will dispose it off. Frankly speaking, in bail matters there is no question of filing counter,” Justice Kumar said, according to a LiveLaw post on X.

The Supreme Court bench also noted that five years have passed during which the appellants have been in jail.

LiveLaw reported Justice Kumar as having said, “You file counter. But, we will not give you two weeks.” When ASG asked for one week, the bench was still reluctant.

“On Friday, you ensure you have proper instructions…we will hear it. See if you can Mr Raju…if something can be done…this is only about consideration of bail. See, five years are over already,” Justice Kumar said, according to Bar and Bench.

Read more on thewire.in

25/10/2025

The institution has flaws, inertia and bureaucratic bottlenecks. But in a world of cascading crises and rising fragmentation, there is no substitute to it.

25/10/2025

Actor Satish Shah Passed Away At 74: Satish Shah was rushed to Hinduja Hospital in Mumbai, where he passed away on Saturday.

25/10/2025

পরিবেশ বিষয়ক
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1D54AVW8eg/

23/10/2025

https://www.facebook.com/share/17DiZbSNqe/

🔴 “I am not an object for your entertainment. Emirates, I refuse! I will never fly with you again!” Emma Raducanu shocked the world by publicly revealing that she had been harassed during a promotional event with Emirates. She was asked to pose for photos with a group of VIPs when an older man — an Emirates representative — began flirting excessively: unwanted touches and whispered suggestions about “deeper cooperation” beyond tennis. The UK erupted in outrage, millions of fans boycotted Emirates, and the company’s stock dropped 3% in just one morning. Shortly after, Chairman Sheikh Ahmed made a surprising public statement, leaving Raducanu in tears. ALL DETAILS ARE IN THE COMMENTS BELOW 👇👇👇