22/10/2025
ðð²ð»ðð¿ð®ð¹ ððð¿ðŒðœð²ð®ð» ð¥ð®ð¹ð¹ð ð®ð¬ð®ð±: ððµð² ððð®ðð¶ððð¶ð°ð
ððº ððµðŠð·ðŠ ðð°ð¯ðŠðŽ
ðð¢ðððŠ ðð°ð·ð¢ð¯ð±ðŠð³ð¢Ì ðžð°ð¯ ðð¢ðŽðµ ðžðŠðŠð¬ðŠð¯ð¥'ðŽ ððŠð¯ðµð³ð¢ð ðð¶ð³ð°ð±ðŠð¢ð¯ ðð¢ðððº. ðð©ðŠ ððªð¯ð¯ ððŠð¥ ð§ð³ð°ð® ðð9 ðµð° ðð18 ð¥ðŠðŽð±ðªðµðŠ ððŠÌð£ð¢ðŽðµðªðŠð¯ ððšðªðŠð³ ðµð¢ð¬ðªð¯ðš ð¢ ðð¢ðµðŠ ð³ð¶ð¯ ð°ð§ ðŽðµð¢ðšðŠ ðžðªð¯ðŽ. ððŠðð°ðž ðªðŽ ð¢ ðŽðµð¢ðµðªðŽðµðªð€ð¢ð ð¢ð¯ð¢ððºðŽðªðŽ ð°ð§ ð©ð°ðž ðµð©ðŠ ð³ð¢ðððº ð±ð¢ð¯ð¯ðŠð¥-ð°ð¶ðµ.
----
The 2025 Central European Rally unfolded as a duel of precision versus speed. On the slick asphalt of Bavaria and the Czech borderlands, Sébastien Ogier began like a metronome - eight straight stages led, six won, and the early narrative seemingly his. Yet by mid-rally the balance shifted. Kalle RovanperÀ, methodical and unflustered, seized control on Stage 9 and never let it go. From that point to the finish he defended the lead through ten consecutive tests, even as Ogier continued to clock faster individual runs.
The raw numbers tell a subtler story. RovanperÀ captured only seven of the 18 stages, but his times came when road conditions were dirtiest and mistakes most likely. Ogierâs late-rally surge produced the eventâs peak speeds - over 125 km/h on SS17 - yet those gains came after the damage was done. Precision, not fireworks, proved decisive. With a finish rate of just 76.6 per cent, the asphaltâs deceptively tidy surface punished even minor lapses.
Contrary to the simple Toyota-versus-Hyundai narrative, the data shows a wider spread of competitiveness. Eight different stage winners emerged, including Adrien Fourmaux and Sami Pajari, each exploiting changing grip and tyre choices. Such diversity hints at narrowing car-performance gaps across the field and an evolving asphalt formula that rewards adaptability as much as outright pace.
The rallyâs lesson is clear: in a sport obsessed with seconds, control is the new speed. RovanperÀâs victory was less about chasing limits and more about mastering uncertainty - a message likely to shape the next two events.
Top line statistics:
Surface: asphalt, 306.08 km competitive; event based in Passau, 16â19 Oct 2025.
⢠Stage wins: RovanperÀ 7, Ogier 6, Katsuta 3, Neuville 2, Evans 2, TÀnak 2, Fourmaux 1, Pajari 1.
⢠Leadership: Ogier led SS1âSS8, RovanperÀ led SS9âSS18.
Peak measured stage speeds: 125.4 km/h (SS17 Ogier) and 124.6 km/h (SS15 Ogier).
⢠Pace shifted mid-event: early loop mostly Ogier vs RovanperÀ; late loop dominated by Ogier for stage times but not for overall lead.
Read of the data:
⢠Pace profile: Speeds clustered ~115â121 km/h early, then several >124 km/h late. Conditions likely improved or later stages were inherently quicker.
⢠Momentum swing: RovanperÀ took control at SS9 and never relinquished it, even while Ogier won SS15âSS18. Banked time pre-SS15 proved decisive.
⢠Depth of competition: Eight different stage winners. Mixed conditions or varying tyre calls created volatility.
⢠Attrition: 23.4% non-finish is high for asphalt, implying incidents or weather-related offs.
⢠Stage-win count â rally control: Ogierâs 6 stage wins outshine RovanperÀâs late pace, but the lead change at SS9 shows cumulative time and error avoidance mattered more than raw stage tally.
⢠Toyota strength isnât the only story: Though Toyota drivers took most stages, isolated wins by Fourmaux, TÀnak and Neuville suggest car-performance gaps narrowed when grip or cuts changed. This weakens any simple âone-make dominanceâ narrative.
⢠Late purple sectors can be a red herring: The fastest speeds (SS15âSS17) came after the lead was settled. These headline speeds can mask that earlier, slower-looking stages created the winning margin.
⢠RovanperÀâs control from SS9 implies strong points haul and power-stage risk management. Expect a conservative strategy in Japan, shifting pressure to Hyundai for aggressive tyre gambles.
