Texas 420 Report

  • Home
  • Texas 420 Report

Texas 420 Report Texas 420 Report will keep you up to date on the state of Cannabis in Texas. From legislation to the legalization movement. Texas 420 Report.

Dan Patrick says Abbott's THC order legitimizes a 'dangerous' industryBy Isaac Yu, Austin Bureau SA Express News Lt. Gov...
12/09/2025

Dan Patrick says Abbott's THC order legitimizes a 'dangerous' industry

By Isaac Yu, Austin Bureau SA Express News

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick on Friday broke his silence over Gov. Greg Abbott’s new THC rules, acknowledging that a gulf remained between the two leaders on the issue.

In a four-page statement, Patrick warned that Abbott’s executive order, which bans retailers from selling THC products to people under 21, would legitimize the booming industry and set up a “massive taxpayer-funded program” to regulate it. He warned that the new age limit wouldn’t adequately protect children from accessing dangerous products.

Patrick also revealed that leaders had agreed on key issues, including prohibiting smoke shops and convenience stores from holding licenses and banning synthetic products like Delta-8, before negotiations broke down without a compromise during last month’s special legislative session.

Still, the statement lacked the harsher language Patrick had used right after Abbott vetoed a total ban in June, emphasizing that “this is not a personal fight.” Patrick previously accused the governor of wanting to legalize recreational ma*****na and ignoring the concerns of police organizations.

“As always, I am open to conversations with the governor, as I would be on any issue,” Patrick wrote in closing.

The THC issue sparked the starkest infighting between Texas’ top two leaders amid a year otherwise marked by priority wins on private school vouchers, property tax relief and a slew of culture war issues.

Under Abbott’s order, retailers would be required to check identification from customers similar to alcohol and cigarette purchases. A tweak to the law’s current concentration limits will also likely limit smokable “flower products” from the market, but maintain access for adults over 21 to edible, drinkable and topical products, including syntethically-derived compounds.

11/09/2025
Thanks to Karen Covington for this info.Texas needs to get rid of this guy.
10/09/2025

Thanks to Karen Covington for this info.
Texas needs to get rid of this guy.

Big shout out to my newest top fans! 💎Mark Martinez Jr., Carlos Lo, James Wolfkill, Mazin Khalid, Billy Cuellar, LocalCo...
10/09/2025

Big shout out to my newest top fans! 💎

Mark Martinez Jr., Carlos Lo, James Wolfkill, Mazin Khalid, Billy Cuellar, LocalConnect GatorNuggz, Hal Keese, Stephen Farmer, Escalon Robert Jaime, Hector Castilla, Edward John Vogt

Drop a comment to welcome them to our community,

Abbott expected to issue executive order setting age requirements for THC-products, other restrictionsThe executive orde...
10/09/2025

Abbott expected to issue executive order setting age requirements for THC-products, other restrictions

The executive order comes after the Legislature ended a special session without the House, Senate and governor agreeing on restrictions.

BY RENZO DOWNEY The Texas Tribune

Gov. Greg Abbott will soon issue an executive order to regulate THC and set a minimum age of 21 to purchase those products in Texas, according to three people who spoke with the governor’s office.

The Legislature’s second special session of the year ended last week after Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick announced that the House, the Senate and Abbott would not reach a deal on the matter. Patrick has been dead set on a full ban, but Abbott called for a regulatory framework like one he outlined on page 3 of his Senate Bill 3 veto letter.

At Friday’s camp safety bill signing, reporters asked Abbott whether he would wait till 2027 for a THC bill or call a special session.

“I will say, stay tuned on that,” Abbott answered. “Something may be happening soon.”

The timeline for an executive order isn’t certain, but Abbott is expected to direct the Department of State Health Services to establish rules governing THC. Sources have seen a document outlining a potential framework for the rules, although they stressed that the framework isn’t final.

21-and-up age minimum to purchase or enter certain businesses

ID checking

Distance requirements from schools

Labeling requirements

Testing products for THC content

Fee increases for businesses

Rules like that would regulate THC sales in a manner akin to liquor stores and could be seen as picking liquor stores as a winner amid declining alcohol sales nationally. Supermarkets and other stores that sell beer and wine — and THC products currently — could be barred from sales.

“Legislators could consider a structure similar to the way alcohol is regulated, with strict enforcement by an agency like the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission,” Abbott floated in his June veto letter.

Abbott’s office declined to comment.

Dan Patrick’s unwillingness to compromise on h**p stymied meaningful reformDespite the consumable h**p industry agreeing...
09/09/2025

Dan Patrick’s unwillingness to compromise on h**p stymied meaningful reform

Despite the consumable h**p industry agreeing that regulations are in order, the Texas Legislature’s second special session ended without it passing any such bills.

By Express-News Editorial Board, Opinion Staff

Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick could use a history lesson.

There’s a reason Prohibition — the ill-fated nationwide ban on making, selling or transporting liquor — was repealed by the 21st Amendment in December 1933, less than 15 years after it was established by the 18th Amendment. U.S. citizens wanted the choice of whether to consume alcohol, aware of its risks of abuse and the corruption and organized crime that filled the void during its banishment.

Since then, the public continues to demand and enjoy alcohol, notwithstanding the enormous death and destruction attributable to its consumption. In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that 178,000 deaths were caused by excessive alcohol use. Fatal conditions that develop over time from drinking alcohol include cancer, heart disease and liver disease; as well as deaths from vehicle crashes, alcohol poisoning, alcohol-involved drug overdoses and su***de.

Since we, as a society, still don’t want to give up alcohol, we strive to minimize its awful consequences through regulations on its sale, including a ban on selling to people under 21; and its public consumption, with bar sales ceasing at varying times throughout the country. And we have criminal penalties for driving under its influence.

Somehow, we’ve come to accept all of this as an appropriate series of compromises between individual liberty and public health and safety.

Yet somehow today, as Texas grapples with how to regulate and accommodate the public’s demand for consumable products derived from h**p as a nonintoxicating or less intoxicating alternative to ma*****na, Patrick and his cohorts of ideologically stubborn Republican lawmakers can’t seem to grasp the moment requires heeding the lessons of nearly 100 years ago.

So, despite the consumable h**p industry agreeing that certain regulations are called for to correct unintended consequences of the 2019 legislation that enabled its businesses, the Texas Legislature’s second special session of 2025 ended without it passing any such bills.

Instead of working toward legislation to address sales to young people, product testing and labeling, appropriate standards for maximum content of cannabinoids, and other measures to limit risks, Patrick and company fixated entirely on ramming through a bill that proposed an outright ban — the same sort of bill that Gov. Greg Abbott vetoed following the regular legislative session and that prompted him to task lawmakers with passing sensible regulations during two special sessions.

In his breathtaking obtuseness, Patrick posted on X before the Senate adjourned: “After long discussions last night between the Governor, Speaker, and me on THC, and continued hours of discussion today, we were not able to come to a resolution.”

What he should have said is he was unwilling to compromise.
“My position remains unchanged,” his post concluded, “the Senate and I are for a total THC ban.”

That ban was proposed in Senate Bill 6, which was filed by Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, and marked a continuation of a nonsensical, hardline stance against the h**p industry. Most significantly, it continued to propose banning the sale of consumable h**p products that contain “any amount” of a cannabinoid other than cannabidiol or cannabigerol, commonly referred to as CBD or CBG, respectively.

As we have noted before, experts in organic chemistry have said this is an unattainable purity standard that renders the entire consumable h**p product industry unviable. Likewise, farmers cited by the Texas Tribune said they can’t produce h**p without any trace of THC, the psychoactive component in ma*****na.
As Patrick alluded to, there was considerable 11th-hour activity to try to reconcile SB6, which had languished in the House Public Health Committee since it was received from the Senate on Aug. 20.

Yet while all attention was focused on SB6, other alternatives that addressed one or more concerns associated with h**p didn’t make it out of their respective committees.

House Bill 36, by Rep. Charlie Geren, R-Fort Worth, proposed restricting sales of h**p-derived products to people 21 or older. It also would have barred people under that age from entering or working at places where h**p products are sold, with an exception for people 18 and older working in a parent’s or legal guardian’s business.

House Bill 43, by Rep. Charlene Ward Johnson, D-Houston, proposed a series of warning labels aimed at keeping h**p-derived products out of children’s reach and discouraging use by people under 25, citing various physical and mental health risks.

Two measures — Senate Bill 30 by Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas; and House Bill 309 by Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park — proposed wide-ranging regulations for the h**p industry that did not include banning its products entirely. While both bills may have been too dense and ambitious to deal with during special sessions that were also tasked with redistricting and responding to the fatal Hill Country flooding of the July 4 weekend, perhaps they can be the basis for reasonable lawmakers to consider during the next legislative session.

Unless Abbott reverses his position that regulation rather than abolishment is in order for the h**p industry, something will need to give if the Legislature is to enact anything meaningful.

And by something, we mean Patrick.

Retailers relieved that Texas skirted a THC ban — againBy Paul Cobler, Alex Nguyen, The Texas TribuneWhen news broke Wed...
08/09/2025

Retailers relieved that Texas skirted a THC ban — again

By Paul Cobler, Alex Nguyen, The Texas Tribune

When news broke Wednesday afternoon of a last-minute push to pass new, stricter regulations for consumable h**p products, the employees at Austin V**e & Smoke sprung into action.

Zaquiri Hensen, a manager at the South Austin store, said he alerted his staff and other stores around the city before beginning to contact his legislators, urging them to reject any strict regulation or ban. Every customer that came into the store for the rest of the day was told to do the same, Hensen said.

“I still watched the House stream just in case because you never know what’s going to happen on the House floor,” Hensen said.
Hensen was finally able to relax around 9 p.m. when Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick announced in a post on X that the Senate would wrap up the second special session hours later, effectively closing out the Legislature without any new THC restrictions or a ban.

The smoke shop’s ability to quickly mobilize played no small part in the incredible opposition from the estimated $8 billion Texas h**p industry and its customer base against legislative threats this year. For the better part of 2025, that industry has grappled with the uncertainty of state legislators seeking to ban or sharply curtail its sales, but on Wednesday, the industry collectively breathed a sigh of relief.

After eight months of committee hearings, debates, a surprise decision by Gov. Greg Abbott to veto a total ban of h**p in June and last-minute negotiations on Wednesday, the status quo will largely remain in place for the industry, for now. H**p-derived THC products — the gummies, flower buds and drinks that are sold at convenience stores, liquor stores, smoke shops and even some grocers across the state — will remain legal.

Cynthia Cabrera, president of the industry trade association Texas H**p Business Council, said she never relaxed throughout the two special sessions this summer, despite the lack of public effort from the House to again pass a total ban of h**p. She barely slept as the Senate remained in session until early Thursday morning.
“I’m glad I stayed vigilant,” said Cabrera, who is also the chief strategy officer of Hometown Hero, Austin-based manufacturer of h**p-derived THC products. “There’s no rest for the weary.”

The Legislature’s impasse means the debate over what to do about h**p products could rage on. Patrick, who has cited protecting children from using the products as key motivator, reiterated in his post on X that he remains committed to a total ban, despite Abbott’s opposition for such a measure.

A likely next step: Age restrictions

Earlier this year, the Legislature did successfully pass some efforts addressing the sale and marketing of THC products geared toward youth. For instance, the ban on the sale of v**e pens, even those that just contain ni****ne — which passed during the regular session and took effect Monday — explicitly applies to any made to look like pens, highlighters, smartphones or other items often seen in schools.

But lawmakers failed to pass an age limit for who can purchase THC products, despite the proposal garnering wide support. Major h**p industry representatives have said they welcome more regulation over an outright ban and Abbott in his veto of the THC h**p ban called for restrictions including age limits.

“If there was a legitimate concern with public safety and access by minors, then that would be resolved by an age gate bill,” Cabrera said. “This piecemeal approach just means [state Sen.] Charles Perry and Dan Patrick lacked the thoughtfulness required to ensure Texans have access to the products they use on a daily basis.”

From the recent special session, House Bill 36 focused specifically on banning THC products for people under 21. There was even chatter among some lawmakers during last-minute negotiations on Wednesday to advance the proposal, though it eventually died in a House committee without receiving a hearing.

This leaves age restrictions in the hands of retailers.

Hensen said his smoke shop, along with other stores he communicates with regularly, have already restricted access to their stores to people 21 or older since the state increased the age to purchase to***co to 21 in 2019.

Supporters of a ban also cited concerns over quality control of h**p products, something Hensen said his store already prioritizes.

“If you have a bad product on your shelves, customers aren’t going to come back and buy it again,” Hensen said. “There’s no reason to have something that would send someone to the hospital.”

Damage already done

While the h**p industry avoided a catastrophic total ban, the decision by lawmakers to remove THC v**es from the market is expected to negatively affect businesses. Hensen, along with several other smoke shop managers in Austin, estimated the v**es made up about 20% of their sales every month.

“I had a couple people yesterday who came in asking for [THC] v**es,” said Eduard Streltsov, a manager at Dream Planet Smoke Shop in East Austin. “When I told them we didn’t have them anymore, they left without buying anything.”

At the same time, the medical ma*****na expansion made it so dispensaries are now allowed to sell THC v**es, potentially tightening the existing competition between the two cannabis industries.

Along with consumable h**p, the shops sell ni****ne products, glass pipes and bongs. Most shops said a total ban would not force them to completely shut down, but it would likely lead to cutting hours for some employees and layoffs for others.

The uncertainty in the h**p industry has also prevented growth. Austin Smoke & V**e at the start of the year was planning to open a new location and hire more employees, but those plans were paused in the spring as the ban measure made its way through the Legislature.

Medical ma*****na’s impact

The country’s conflicting cannabis laws have pitted two sides of the industry against each other in Texas. Although h**p-derived THC is legal, ma*****na remains federally illegal except with a prescription. Companies in the heavily regulated Texas medical industry, which has pushed for regulation and never heavily opposed a ban on its sister industry, have reported losing customers to the h**p industry.

Texas has had a medical ma*****na program since 2015, and it has been expanded three times since in 2019, 2021 and this year. The program is restrictive, only allowing patients with a narrow set of conditions to get a prescription to purchase ma*****na from a small number of distributors permitted to operate in the state.

Jervonne Singletary, a spokesperson for the Austin medical ma*****na company goodblend, said that while her company believes both the h**p industry and medical ma*****na industry can coexist in Texas, the company was disappointed to not see restrictions passed that put the industries on a more level playing field.

“We want to ensure that what people are taking is safe and effective for the reasons that they're taking it,” Singletary said. “At the end of the day, these are both intoxicating products with very, very few genetic differences, and so they should be treated in some form or fashion in a like manner.”

The Legislature’s uncertainty over h**p-derived THC also impacted the medical ma*****na industry. Singletary’s company fielded calls throughout the spring and summer from patients concerned that the legislative debate would also harm access to medical ma*****na.

The passage of expansion for the medical ma*****na program will still be a boon for the industry, Singletary said, pointing to the law’s removal of restrictions like an arduous requirement that dispensaries not hold their product in stores overnight. But the rollout could take several months, delaying an increase in access for ailing users.

“The uncertainty has been a bit hard to plan in, but I think now we are past that uncertainty that hinders business development, and we can move forward as a company, and the industry can move forward with the legislature that actually supports the program.”

Heather Fazio, director of advocacy for Texas Cannabis Policy Center, said in spite of the intense debates surrounding medical ma*****na and h**p in 2025, Texas is closer than ever to legalizing recreational ma*****na. Fazio’s advocacy group has worked in Texas for a decade to push the creation of the medical ma*****na program, decriminalize ma*****na possession, protect the h**p industry and fully legalize the drug.

“We're headed in the right direction, and we're having meaningful conversations about these policies,” Fazio said. “When we are able to have a seat at the table and have lawmakers at the table, we start to really break down the issue and help to find shared values.”

It’s medicine!
05/09/2025

It’s medicine!

Address


Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Texas 420 Report posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Texas 420 Report:

  • Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company?

Share