The Obnoxious Conservative

21/01/2025

Is ending birthright citizenship against the 14th amendment? Many would say yes. But, let’s look at it a little closer.

The 14th amendment was established to ensure the children of slaves brought here against their will were considered US citizens.

The amendment states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The key part here pertaining to Illegal immigrant’s children is they are not under jurisdiction of the United States. The slaves were considered under the jurisdiction because they were brought here unwillingly. Wording is crucial when looking at amendments and they should not be paraphrased.

It clearly states Born in the US AND under jurisdiction thereof.

What are your thoughts?

21/01/2025

What did Joe Biden and the Democrats think about Pre-emptive pardons when they lied and said Trump would do it. Watch and find out.

CRACKED HYPOCRISY: Biden exposed Democrats' double standard with preemptive pardons — something he vowed Americans would "never see." Meanwhile, Donald Trump...

02/09/2024

Name one accomplishment that Harris has had? I don’t think we can…

31/12/2023

Let’s talk about the States removing President Trump from the ballot for being an insurrectionist.

The courts are citing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment which they say gives them the authority to make the decision. Here is what it says.

Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

However, if you keep reading the 14th Amendment you will find section 5 which says this.

Section 5.

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Section 5 cannot be divorced from Section 3.
This clearly states that Congress is the only body that could enforce Section 3, by appropriate legislation, which they did by passing 18 USC 2383 which states the following:

2383. Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

So to make this clear. The President can’t be removed from the Ballot or barred from office unless he is charged under this statute and found guilty and punished by Congress. Any other decision by any judge is false and unconstitutional. To put it simply what if they were trying to remove someone from office for being a murderer? The court can’t decide they are a murderer without them being charged and convicted of murder. Being charged and convicted of robbery still does not make you a murderer.

Let’s share this with those who don’t read the Constitution and just believe the media lies.