15/10/2025
Australians are finally waking up to the illusion of choice. For decades, the nation has been ruled by two wings of the same bird – Labor and Liberal – each claiming to offer something different while serving the same global interests.
Both parties have long abandoned the Australian people in favour of the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organisation, the G20, and the Paris Climate Agreement – unelected networks riddled with controversy and conflicts of interest.
Australia’s energy, health, migration, and economic policies now bear the fingerprints of foreign bureaucrats and global technocrats who answer to no Australian voter.
Layered on top of this is the Five Eyes Intelligence Network, which blurs the line between domestic privacy and international surveillance, and the growing influence of central banks – institutions that operate beyond electoral accountability yet dictate the nation’s financial direction.
Together, they form a lattice of unelected power: a web of influence that has quietly replaced national sovereignty with compliance.
The Liberal Party’s collapse has become impossible to ignore. Once the home of enterprise and conviction, it now drifts without principle or purpose.
Sussan Ley presides over a hollowed organisation consumed by factional warfare and paralysed by weakness. What remains is a brand – not a movement.
A small number of figures stand apart: Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Andrew Hastie, Alex Antic, along with the likes of Victoria’s Western Region upper house members Beverley McArthur and Joe McCracken.
They have shown the rare courage to speak their minds, to challenge their own party’s inertia, and to represent the forgotten Australians outside the capital cities. Yet they remain voices of integrity in a party that long ago stopped listening.
Labor, by contrast, survives not through performance but through monopoly. In Victoria, it has governed for 23 of the past 27 years – an astonishing record matched only by its catalogue of scandals, fiscal ruin, and bureaucratic decay.
Under Daniel Andrews, the state became a byword for secrecy, coercion, and economic waste. Jacinta Allan has simply repackaged the same dysfunction in smoother language, presiding over debt, disillusionment, and division.
Federally, Anthony Albanese’s Labor government governs by optics. Each crisis is met with a carefully crafted announcement, each policy failure with another press conference.
As Australians struggle with record cost-of-living pressures, housing shortages, and rising taxation, the Prime Minister spends more time abroad than addressing the despair at home.
On the moral front, both major parties have failed completely. The Liberal Party’s unflinching defence of Israel’s actions in Gaza – acts condemned globally as ethnic cleansing – has stripped it of moral credibility.
Labor’s half-hearted response has been no better. Both have chosen allegiance to global orthodoxy over humanity.
Amid this decay, One Nation is soaring in the polls. Its rise is not accidental – it reflects a growing national rejection of managed decline.
Australians are turning to the party because it speaks plainly about what others fear to confront: protecting borders, restoring energy independence, defending free speech, investing in regional Australia, opposing global censorship regimes, and standing against the digital surveillance state.
While not without imperfections, One Nation has emerged as the genuine voice of sovereignty and self-determination.
The Greens, meanwhile, posture as moral arbiters but have devolved into an ideological cult of virtue signalling. Their environmentalism is performative, their economics punitive, and their social agenda increasingly authoritarian.
They masquerade as defenders of nature while obstructing practical energy solutions, destroy economic opportunity under the guise of equity, and divide Australians into categories of guilt and grievance. Their movement is not ecological – it is ideological.
Economic sovereignty has been one of the greatest casualties of this global alignment. Australia’s farmland, ports, and infrastructure have been sold to foreign powers.
Our energy grids are dictated by international climate treaties. Even housing has become a speculative commodity for offshore investors. Both major parties have reduced the nation to an asset class.
Meanwhile, the digital frontier is becoming the next battleground for freedom. Under the banners of “safety” and “misinformation,” both Labor and Liberal have advanced censorship laws empowering unelected regulators to police public discourse.
The rollout of digital identity frameworks – endorsed by the UN and WEF – threatens to merge personal freedom with state surveillance. The technology that once promised liberation is being repurposed for control.
And through it all, Australia’s media plays its assigned role: filtering reality, manufacturing consent, and insulating the political class from scrutiny.
Funded and influenced by the same corporate and global interests, the press now serves as the narrative wing of the establishment. It silences dissent, protects power, and ensures that Australians hear only what they are permitted to know.
The pattern is unmistakable. Australia is governed not by democracy in practice but by a managerial elite in partnership with transnational institutions. Policy is dictated, not debated. Elections change the actors, never the agenda.
One Nation’s rise marks the beginning of a national correction. Just as Nigel Farage’s Reform UK shattered Britain’s conservative establishment, One Nation’s ascent is reshaping Australian politics from below.
It represents a growing movement of citizens who have simply had enough – of global subservience, economic exploitation, and moral cowardice.
This page has been accused of supporting the Liberal Party because we criticise Labor. That claim is false. We criticise Labor because they govern; we condemn the Liberals because they have surrendered.
Both have betrayed the people they claim to represent, and both have become instruments of global influence rather than national will.
Australia stands at a crossroads. One path leads further into dependency, censorship, and control. The other leads toward renewal – sovereignty, transparency, and the restoration of national dignity.
The question is no longer whether change is coming. It is whether Australia will be ready when it arrives.
