Perth Proclaimer Portal

28/04/2026

Australian Patriots Party

Have you actually had a look?..
Maybe get involved

12/04/2026

Looks just like the gang ra**sts in Spain, England, France and Italy - is that a coincidence?.. ask a lefty I guess.

11/04/2026

PATRIOTISM IS UNITY: THE OLDEST TRICK IN POLITICS IS CONVINCING YOU OTHERWISE

Patriotism has never been about blind loyalty, flag-waving theatrics, or shutting down criticism. At its core, patriotism is the collective instinct of a people to preserve, protect, and improve the nation they belong to.
It is the glue that holds societies together when pressure mounts. Strip away the noise, and patriotism is unity in action. It is the shared understanding that despite differences in background, belief, or circumstance, the survival and success of the nation comes first.

Modern political narratives often attempt to fracture this understanding.

They present patriotism and unity as if they are competing forces rather than two sides of the same coin. This is not an accident. It is a strategy. By dividing people into smaller, more easily managed groups, governments and political actors can introduce policies that would face overwhelming resistance if the population were acting as a unified whole.

History offers a clear pattern.

When populations are united under a shared national identity, they become significantly harder to manipulate. When they are divided, they become easier to govern, easier to influence, and easier to control.

This is not a theory. It is a recurring reality observed across centuries of governance.

One of the most powerful examples of patriotism preserving a nation is found in the United Kingdom during World War II.

In 1940, Britain stood largely alone against N**i Germany after much of Europe had fallen. The country faced sustained aerial bombardment during the Blitz, with cities like London enduring nightly attacks.

The physical destruction was immense, but what mattered more was the psychological pressure. The expectation from German leadership was that morale would collapse and the British public would demand surrender.

That did not happen. Patriotism and unity became inseparable forces. Civilians, soldiers, factory workers, and political leaders aligned around a singular purpose. Rationing was accepted. Civil defence systems were organised. Communities supported one another under extreme conditions.

The British government certainly used propaganda, but the effectiveness of that messaging depended entirely on an already existing sense of national unity. Without it, the country would likely have fractured under pressure. Instead, it endured and ultimately contributed to the defeat of N**i Germany.

A similar pattern can be observed in the United States during the Great Depression and World War II. In the 1930s, the country faced economic collapse on a scale that threatened social stability. Unemployment soared, banks failed, and public confidence deteriorated.

The response was not purely economic policy. It was also a reinforcement of national identity and collective responsibility. Programs like the New Deal relied heavily on public cooperation and trust in the idea that recovery was a shared effort.

When the United States entered World War II, patriotism again became a unifying force.
Industrial production surged as citizens accepted rationing, workforce shifts, and personal sacrifice. Women entered the workforce in unprecedented numbers.

Communities mobilised around the war effort. The scale of coordination required would not have been possible without a strong sense of national unity tied directly to patriotic identity.

These examples demonstrate a key truth. Patriotism does not divide people. It aligns them toward a common goal. The division comes when that shared identity is deliberately weakened.

Political systems, particularly in stable democracies, often rely on tension to justify expansion of authority. When populations are calm, cohesive, and confident, there is less perceived need for intervention. When populations are divided and in conflict, there is a greater appetite for regulation, oversight, and new laws aimed at managing the instability.

One method used to create this tension is identity fragmentation. Citizens are encouraged to view themselves primarily through narrower lenses such as race, class, ideology, or cultural affiliation rather than as members of a unified nation. While these identities are real and important, elevating them above national identity creates competing interests within the same society. This competition can then be amplified through media, political rhetoric, and policy framing.

The result is a population that begins to see itself not as a collective but as a collection of opposing groups. Once this mindset takes hold, unity becomes more difficult to achieve. Policies can then be introduced under the justification of managing conflict, addressing grievances, or protecting specific groups. Each new layer of legislation appears necessary within the context of division, even if that division was artificially intensified in the first place.

This process is not limited to any one country. It has been observed globally. In the late Roman Republic, internal divisions between social classes and political factions weakened the state. Leaders exploited these divisions to gain power, ultimately contributing to the transition from republic to empire. Unity eroded, and with it, the ability of citizens to collectively influence governance.

In more recent history, Yugoslavia in the 1990s provides a stark example of how the breakdown of national unity can lead to catastrophic consequences.

Ethnic and political divisions were intensified by leadership and media narratives. As trust between groups collapsed, the country descended into conflict. Patriotism, once tied to a unified Yugoslav identity, was replaced by competing nationalisms. The absence of a shared identity removed the stabilising force that had previously held the state together.

On the other side of the spectrum, Singapore offers an example of how reinforcing a shared national identity can contribute to stability and growth.

Following independence in 1965, the country faced significant challenges including economic vulnerability and ethnic diversity. The government prioritised a cohesive national identity alongside economic development. Policies were implemented to encourage integration and shared civic responsibility.

While not without criticism, the emphasis on unity has played a role in Singapore’s transformation into a stable and prosperous nation.

The consistent thread across these cases is the relationship between unity and resilience. Nations that maintain a strong sense of collective identity are better equipped to navigate crises. Nations that allow or encourage deep internal divisions become more vulnerable to instability and external pressure.

It is important to clarify that patriotism does not require agreement on all issues.

Healthy debate and criticism are essential components of a functioning society. Patriotism, in its most constructive form, includes the desire to improve the nation, not just preserve it. The distinction lies in whether disagreements occur within a framework of shared identity or whether they evolve into fundamental divisions that erode that identity altogether.

When politics frames patriotism as exclusionary or positions unity as separate from national identity, it creates confusion. People begin to question whether supporting their country means opposing others within it. This false dilemma weakens both concepts. Unity without a shared identity lacks direction. Patriotism without unity becomes hollow and performative.

The practical consequence of this confusion is a population that is less coordinated, less confident, and more susceptible to influence. Decision making becomes reactive rather than strategic. Public discourse shifts from problem solving to conflict management. In this environment, the introduction of new laws and regulations becomes easier to justify, as they are presented as solutions to the very divisions that have been amplified.

Understanding this dynamic does not require cynicism. It requires awareness.

Recognising the value of patriotism as a unifying force allows individuals to engage more effectively in civic life. It encourages a broader perspective that considers the long term stability and success of the nation as a whole.

Patriotism, when grounded in reality and informed by history, is not a relic of the past. It is a practical tool for maintaining cohesion in an increasingly complex world. It provides a foundation upon which diverse populations can build a shared future without losing their individual identities.

The challenge is not choosing between patriotism and unity. The challenge is resisting the narrative that they are separate in the first place. History shows that when they are aligned, nations endure even under extreme pressure. When they are divided, the consequences can be severe and lasting.

In the end, patriotism is not about standing above others within your country. It is about standing with them when it matters most.

Are you a Patriot of Australia and tired of the same old same old?
Link is in the Comments. Get on board.

- Alan MacGregor.

Australian Patriots Party

11/04/2026

PERTH PROCLAIMER TAKES OVER THE AIRWAVES: RADIO WASHROOM JUST GOT A PROMPT

Somewhere between algorithm fatigue and being told what to think by people who still live with their parents, something clicked. Not loudly, not dramatically, just a quiet moment where enough was enough.

And like most Gen X decisions, it wasn’t announced with a press conference, it just… happened.

Perth Proclaimer has officially taken over Radio Washroom.

No corporate fluff, no committee of feelings, no diversity quota meeting that runs longer than the actual show. Just a simple idea, build something real, and make it better than anything else out there.

Now before anyone starts clutching their ethically sourced oat milk, let’s clear something up.

We are not here to push politics, sell outrage, or lecture people between songs like some kind of digital school assembly. We are here to entertain, connect, and remind people what radio actually used to feel like.

Because once upon a time, radio was alive. It had personality, Smarts, humour, and just enough chaos to keep you tuned in.
It didn’t need a trigger warning before a guitar solo.

What you’re getting now is an upgrade.
Not just a few buttons and sliders changed, but a full overhaul driven by people who remember life before everything needed approval. A system built with intention, not stitched together by someone chasing trends.

And yes, we’re applying the Gen X mentality to all of it.
W
hich means common sense is back on the menu, sarcasm is fully operational, and nobody is getting cancelled for having a personality. It also means if something is funny, it stays, regardless of whether it offends someone who went looking to be offended.

Let’s be honest, modern media is exhausting. Everything is filtered, curated, sanitized, and wrapped in a layer of corporate fear. Even the jokes sound like they’ve been approved by legal.

We’re not doing that.
We’re not interested in being the safest option in the room.
We’re interested in being the most real.

Radio Washroom is about to become something people actually look forward to again.
A place where you can tune in and not feel like you’re being managed like a liability.
A place where the hosts sound like humans, not training manuals.

And yes, we know exactly what that puts us on. Somewhere near the top of the ideological hit list.
Right between “people who ask questions” and “people who don’t apologise for existing.”

To which we say, good - If being normal, having a laugh, and not bending to every passing trend gets you on a list, then we’ll bring snacks and make ourselves comfortable.
We’ve been on worse lists, usually at school, and we survived those just fine.

The truth is, we don’t care about chasing approval. We actually care about building something people actually enjoy. And those two things rarely exist in the same room anymore.

There will be music, real music, not just algorithm-approved background noise.
There will be conversations, proper ones, not scripted segments designed to avoid risk.
And there will be special guests who actually have something to say.

Not influencers reading off talking points.
Not activists trying to win arguments nobody asked for.
Just people with stories, opinions, and the ability to laugh at themselves.

We’re bringing back that feeling of tuning in and not knowing exactly what’s coming next.
Because unpredictability used to be part of the magic. Now it’s treated like a liability - were not having it.

Gen X doesn’t see it that way.
We see it as oxygen.
Without it, everything starts to feel the same.

And let’s talk about this obsession with “inclusion” for a second.
Not the genuine kind, where people are treated with respect and given a fair go.
We’re talking about the performative version, where boxes matter more than people.

We’re not playing that game. If you’re good, you’re in.
If you’re interesting, you’re welcome.

If you can hold a conversation without turning it into a lecture, you’re already ahead of half the industry. That’s the only standard that matters here.
Not what you tick on a form, but what you bring to the table.

Because forced inclusion isn’t inclusion, it’s branding. And branding doesn’t make great radio.
People do.

We’re building this for the listeners who are tired of being talked down to.
For the ones who just want to laugh, think, and enjoy something without being analysed.
For the ones who remember when entertainment didn’t come with instructions.

And yes, we fully expect some noise when this launches.
There will be articles, opinions, probably a few dramatic posts about how we’re everything wrong with the world. We’ll read them, laugh, and then get back to doing what we do.

Because outrage is predictable.
And predictable things don’t scare Gen X.
They just get filed under “background noise” and ignored.

What does matter is the response from real people.
The ones who tune in, stay, and come back the next day.
That’s the only metric worth paying attention to.

This is not about competing with anyone. It’s about outlasting the nonsense.
Because trends come and go, but authenticity tends to stick around.

We’ve seen enough cycles to know how this plays out.
Something gets popular, gets overcorrected, gets diluted, and eventually collapses under its own weight.
Then people start looking for something real again.

That’s where we come in.
Not trying to reinvent the wheel, just reminding people it actually works.
And it doesn’t need a committee to roll forward.

So over the next few months, things are going to take shape.
Systems upgraded, content refined, voices brought in.
All of it built with one goal, make it worth your time.

No filler.
No forced narratives.
No background agenda quietly steering the ship.

Just good radio.
The kind that makes you stay in the car a little longer.
The kind that makes you laugh out loud when you didn’t expect it.

And if that puts us at number one on some ideological hit list, so be it.
We’ve never been particularly interested in fitting in.
That’s kind of the whole point.

Gen X doesn’t need permission to build something.
We just build it.
And if it works, it works.

So consider this the heads up.
Not a polished announcement, not a rehearsed campaign.
Just a straight-up message.

Radio Washroom is getting rebuilt.
Perth Proclaimer is behind the wheel.
And it’s about to sound a lot more like real life again.

One of our New Radio station Logos Pictured

New station details Posted real soon -
Washroom studio - Bogan Broadcasting Network - Alan MacGregor - Rhompa - Perth Proclaimer

Stay tuned.

11/04/2026

GEN X: THE LAST GENERATION - THAT CAN’T BE PROGRAMMED

There are a lot of paradoxes in this world, and I believe that somewhere in the middle of them, character is forged. Not in comfort, not in silence, but in contradiction, pressure, and the need to think for yourself.

That’s where some of us were built differently.

Today, we are flooded with information, misinformation, noise, and judgment from every direction. - Every opinion is boxed, labeled, and pushed into a corner before it even has a chance to breathe.

You are either for something or against it, and if you refuse to pick a side, you become the target.

But Gen X grew up in a different classroom entirely.
We weren’t taught what to think, we were taught how to think, and that distinction matters more than ever. The goal was simple, become the best version of yourself and don’t let anything hold you back.

Discipline was not oppression, it was direction.
Accountability was not trauma, it was a compass that kept you out of trouble.
Actions had consequences, and that understanding quietly built stronger people.

Somewhere along the line, that shifted.

Now accountability is often reframed as a condition, especially in young boys and adolescent men trying to find their footing. What used to be corrected with guidance is now too often medicated into submission.

That is not to say real issues do not exist, because they absolutely do.

But when every rough edge is labeled a disorder, you stop shaping people and start suppressing them. And suppressed people do not grow, they fracture.

Gen X men were not raised to hate, divide, or label.

We did not grow up hearing words like phobe thrown around as conversation stoppers.
We were raised to stand firm, speak plainly, and judge people by their actions, not categories.

There was no label factory stamping identities onto us before we even understood ourselves.
No endless list of boxes designed to shut down dialogue before it begins.
Just people, flawed, different, and expected to figure it out together.

We were taught to be open minded without being weak minded.
To listen without surrendering our ability to think critically.
And most importantly, not to force our beliefs down someone else’s throat.

Politics, religion, race, personal struggles, those were things you navigated, not weapons you used. They were part of life, not your entire identity.
And they certainly were not tools to silence someone who disagreed with you.

I have seen different cultures firsthand, across Scotland and Australia, across fifteen schools and countless environments.
Bullying exists, it always has, and it comes in many forms.
Sometimes it is cruel, sometimes it is ignorant, but it is not new.

Even here in Australia, people get singled out for how they speak, where they come from, or how they sound. That is not a modern invention, it is human behavior in its rawest form.

But what we did with it then is very different to what we are seeing now.

We did not build our identity around being victims.
We did not wear hardship like a badge to gain sympathy or status.
We learned to rise above it, not anchor ourselves to it.

Because here is the truth, playing the victim may gain attention, but it does not build strength.
It may attract people, but only those who need you to stay broken to keep their role in your life.
That is not empowerment, that is dependency dressed up as support.

A strong person, no matter their race or background, refuses to be defined by the lowest moment someone throws at them. They understand that ignorance will always exist in some form.
And they choose not to let it write their story.

What we are seeing now, especially on social media, is something else entirely.

A constant hunger for attention, validation, outrage, and control.
Not everyone falls into it, but enough do to shape the culture around them.

Some want to be heard, some want to be followed, some want to make money, and some want to tear others down. It has become a marketplace of identity, where outrage sells faster than truth.
And the louder the noise, the less room there is for reason.

So the real question is not what is happening, but why.

What is flipping the switch in younger generations that leads them toward insecurity instead of resilience. What is turning potential into fragility.

There is no other species on Earth that turns on its own quite like humans do.
Not just for survival, but for ideology, perception, and digital applause.
And yet at the same time, we are capable of incredible unity when we choose it.

So what does it take for two people on opposite sides to sit down and laugh again.
What does it take for differences to become conversations instead of battle lines.
What does it take for respect to return without conditions.

Because beneath all of it, we are still the same.
Different colours, different cultures, but the same instincts, the same drive to protect, build, and belong. That has not changed, only the noise around it has.

There was a time when loyalty, protection, and family meant something without needing to be explained.

Where standing your ground did not require permission from a screen.
Where being a decent human did not come with a checklist.

Now people are being pushed to the edge over words on a screen that vanish in days.
Arguments are deleted, conversations are buried, and nothing truly sticks.
It is a cycle designed to keep people reactive, not reflective.

That is the void.
That is where distraction replaces direction.
That is where people are easier to influence than they are to understand.

And slowly, quietly, that influence becomes programming.
Not through force, but through repetition, pressure, and fear of standing alone.
A thousand small nudges that shape how people think without them even realizing it.

So how do we stop it.
Some will say more control is the answer, more rules, more filters, more oversight.
But control has never created strength, it only creates compliance.

The wiser path is harder, but it is clearer.
Remove what weakens people, not challenge what strengthens them.
Encourage resilience, not reliance.

Because a society that cannot think for itself will always be led by those who think for it.
And a generation that loses its backbone will eventually lose its direction.
That is not progress, that is erosion.

Gen X stands outside of that cycle.
Not perfect, not untouched, but far less dependent on it for identity.

We remember a world before the noise, and that memory matters.

We were taught to think in reality, not react to illusion. To stand on values, not trends.
To question everything, including ourselves.

That is why we are different.
Not better, not above, but grounded in something that cannot be easily rewritten.

A foundation built before the algorithm took over.

So if there is one thing to pass down, it is not fear, not division, not dependency.
It is values, accountability, and the courage to think freely.
Because without those, everything else is just noise.

And noise never built anything worth keeping.

- Alan MacGregor

Please Like and share our page.

06/04/2026

Hahahaha @ "SMOO" ..
What is this world coming to?? hahhahahahahahhhaha.

THE WORLDWIDE EPIDEMIC - Reports say, Aussies Can no longer W**k,..

Because they all refuse to give their ID to p**n companies in order to see the content hahaha..

Ahhh The days of the picture mag may even be back and we can educate Gen - Z in what a "Smoo" is, the meaning of "Norks", and the magical outcomes of the "Wet T-shirt comp" .