06/08/2026
The logic driving the review is straightforward, when the only visible response to a limited or regional attack is strategic, intercontinental retaliation, deterrence can feel blunt and implausible. Advocates of a more graduated arsenal argue that a wider menu of options makes deterrence more believable by reducing the binary choice between inaction and all‑out strategic exchange. Critics counter that normalizing lower‑yield or shorter‑range nuclear employment could lower the threshold for use and complicate crisis stability.
Washington is quietly rethinking the architecture of American deterrence. A classified Pentagon review, overseen by policy chief Elbridge Colby, is ex