06/02/2024
Decoding IELTS Writing Task 2: Unveiling the Crucial Factors That Determine High vs. Low Scores
🟩 Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
(ANSWER 1) If you write like this, you can't get more than 6 ⬇️
⚪ Some university students advocate for diversifying their studies beyond their main subjects, asserting that it fosters a broader understanding and perspective. They argue that exposure to various disciplines enhances critical thinking and adaptability, qualities valued in today's dynamic job market. Conversely, others contend that dedicating exclusive attention to one's primary field of study is paramount. They emphasize the importance of achieving high grades and qualifications, asserting that specialization leads to greater expertise and competitiveness in the job market.
Personally, I believe that a balanced approach is crucial. While exploring additional subjects can enrich one's academic experience and intellectual breadth, it should not overshadow the core focus. Allocating sufficient time and effort to mastering one's main subjects is essential for achieving academic excellence and securing future prospects. However, incorporating supplementary courses or electives can complement the primary curriculum, offering valuable insights and interdisciplinary skills.
Moreover, the modern workforce increasingly values individuals with versatile skill sets and interdisciplinary knowledge. Therefore, students who pursue diverse interests alongside their main subjects may gain a competitive edge in the job market. Nonetheless, it is essential to prioritize and manage time effectively to prevent dilution of academic performance.
In conclusion, the debate between dedicating all time to one's main subjects versus exploring other disciplines is multifaceted. While specialization is crucial for expertise, embracing a diverse academic experience can also yield numerous benefits. Ultimately, striking a balance between the two approaches is vital for academic success and future career prospects.
(ANSWER 2) If you write like this, you'll definitely get more than 7 on IELTS writing test ⬇️
⚪This question requires candidates to analyze two contrasting perspectives regarding whether university students should dedicate their time solely to studying for their main qualification or whether they should diversify their learning by exploring other subjects.
One viewpoint is that students should focus exclusively on their main subjects in order to excel and obtain their desired qualification. Advocates of this stance argue that specialization maximizes the likelihood of success in a competitive academic environment. By devoting all their time and energy to mastering their primary discipline, students can achieve deeper understanding and higher grades, ultimately enhancing their career prospects.
Conversely, there is a contingent who believes that exploring additional subjects alongside their main area of study offers numerous benefits. This group contends that interdisciplinary learning fosters creativity, critical thinking, and a broader understanding of the world. Exposure to diverse subjects equips students with a range of skills and perspectives that can be valuable in both academic and professional contexts. Furthermore, it can help individuals discover new passions and career paths they may not have previously considered.
In my opinion, while it is important for students to prioritize their main qualification, they should also have the opportunity to explore other subjects that interest them. This balanced approach allows for both specialization and breadth of knowledge, nurturing well-rounded individuals who are equipped to thrive in a rapidly evolving global landscape. Therefore, universities should offer flexible curricula that accommodate both intensive study within a chosen field and opportunities for interdisciplinary exploration.
🌸 CONCLUSION:-
Both answers address the given question effectively by discussing the contrasting views regarding whether university students should focus solely on their main subjects or diversify their learning. Here are the key differences between the two:
1. Answer 1:
- Provides a balanced approach but lacks depth in analysis and supporting arguments.
- Offers a personal opinion but does not provide strong reasoning or examples to support it.
- The language is clear and coherent but lacks sophistication and complexity.
- The structure is simple and straightforward without much variation in sentence structure.
2. Answer 2:
- Presents a more nuanced analysis with detailed explanations and examples for each perspective.
- Demonstrates a high level of vocabulary and sentence complexity, indicating a strong command of language.
- Provides a clear personal opinion supported by well-reasoned arguments and examples.
- Utilizes a well-structured essay format with clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, contributing to overall coherence and cohesion.
In summary, Answer 2 exhibits a higher level of analysis, language proficiency, and essay structure compared to Answer 1, which reflects in the higher score it received.
