16/10/2025
BLord Wins 💯.
Why BLord Actually Stands on Stronger Ground
It all started when VDM called out BLord, saying BLord was extorting people because he was selling a remade iPhone XR, to “iPhone 17 Pro,” for ₦400,000.
Now, let’s be honest saying “the price is too high” is a personal opinion, and that’s fine.
But saying “you’re extorting people” is a factual accusation, not an opinion.
It means you’re calling someone a cheat or a scammer, and that’s defamation if you can’t prove it.
So from that point, VDM opened himself to a defamation claim.
You can criticize prices, but once you accuse someone of criminal behavior without evidence, it becomes libel.
Out of anger, BLord reacted he allegedly bought and posted VDM’s old “n○○dles” (private clips) that were already on the internet.
Yes, that move is morally wrong, and under normal circumstances it could amount to a cybercrime, but here’s where things flipped.
VDM came out publicly saying it didn’t affect him, laughed about it.
He went as far as sending new ones himself, telling BLord he could post them if he wanted.
That’s consent , plain and simple.
And in law, once you give consent and deny being hurt, you’ve killed your own case.
No court can award you damages for something you openly said didn’t injure you.
So now, if we’re being real:
VDM’s words about BLord were defamatory they damaged a man’s business image and reputation.
BLord’s act was morally questionable but legally shielded because VDM consented and said he felt no harm.
VDM’s threats to sue are empty, because his own actions and words contradict his claim.
In short 👇🏽
⚖️ VDM could have had a point if he only said “the price is too high.”
🚫 But by calling it extortion, he crossed into defamation territory.
🧾 His later actions destroyed any privacy case he thought he had