Japanese, American and German Community Office

Japanese, American and German Community Office Japanese, American and German Community Office
Japanisch, Amerikanisches und Deutsches Bürgerbüro

Our Services:

• English-speaking staff
• Linguistic support
• Newcomers’ Orientation (integration and acclimation in German communities)
• Assistance with change of status
• Handling of administrative issues (e.g. assistance with German authorities, visa questions, etc.)
• German-American cultural relations
• Information on host nation policies and regulations (e.g. recycling, driving re

gulations, pet policies, etc.)
• Assistance in locating special interest items
• Hosting of special events throughout the year
• Assistance for Germans and other nationalities with U.S.-related topics
• Referral to German-American institutions and clubs
• Facilitating/establishing official and family contacts
• Availability of information brochures in English


Unsere Dienstleistungen:

• Mehrsprachige Mitarbeiter
• Hilfestellung bei Verständigungsproblemen
• Orientierungsveranstaltungen für neuangekommene Angehörige der AFRTN. (Integration beziehungsweise Eingliederung in deutsche Gemeinden)
• Beratung bei Änderungen des Aufenthaltstitels
• Hilfe bei Verwaltungsangelegenheiten (z.B. Unterstützung bei Behördengängen, Visafragen, etc.)
• Deutsch-amerikanische Beziehungen kultureller Art
• Informationen über Vorgaben und Richtlinien des Gastlandes (z.B. Mülltrennung, Straßenverkehrsordnung, Tierhaltung, etc.)
• Unterstützung bei der Suche nach speziellen Produkten
• Planung und Durchführung von verschiedenen Veranstaltungen im Laufe des Jahres
• Unterstützung für deutsche und Bürger anderer Nationalität bei US-relevanten Themen
• Vorstellung von deutsch-amerikanischen Einrichtungen und Clubs
• Herstellen von Kontakten auf offizieller und privater Ebene
• Angebot an Informationsmaterial in englischer Sprache

Karlsruhe, Germany
05/07/2024

Karlsruhe, Germany

04/07/2024

Karlsruhe, Germany🇺🇸Happy Independence Day 2024!

Let's remember and honor the heroes
who made our freedom possible.

Stuttgart, Germay🇺🇸US military bases in Europe raise security threat levelsStars and Stripes reporter Jennifer H. Svan a...
01/07/2024

Stuttgart, Germay🇺🇸US military bases in Europe raise security threat levels
Stars and Stripes reporter Jennifer H. Svan and
Phillip Walter Wellman contributed to this report.

U.S. military bases in Europe were put on a heightened state of alert over the weekend as installations urged vigilance among their members. At U.S. European Command headquarters in Stuttgart, the Army garrison on Sunday issued a communitywide alert that the force protection threat level was elevated to condition “Charlie” until further notice.

Similar directives were sent to other bases in Germany, including the Army’s Rheinland-Pfalz and Ramstein Air Base, which together form the largest U.S. military community overseas. The Rheinland-Pfalz garrison alert includes Baumholder and outlying installations in Romania and Bulgaria.

Aviano Air Base in Italy also rose its condition level to Charlie, and other installations in Italy introduced enhanced security measures.

The Charlie threat level “applies when an incident occurs or intelligence is received indicating some form of terrorist action or targeting against personnel or facilities is likely,” according to the Army’s website.

Service members and others should anticipate significant delays at gate entry points because of increased security, according to the alerts.

U.S. Army garrison in Stuttgart referred questions about the change in force protection to EUCOM.

EUCOM said in a statement Sunday that it is “constantly assessing a variety of factors that play into the safety of the U.S. military community abroad. As part of that effort, we often times take additional steps to ensure the safety of our service members.”

Military community members should report any suspicious activity, monitor State Department travel advisories and take precautions to minimize personal risk, the statement added.

Typically, military commands decline to get into specifics about changes in force protection measures for security reasons. On Saturday, Spangdahlem Air Base, an installation in rural western Germany, issued its own alert that said 52nd Fighter Wing airmen were prohibited from wearing their uniforms off base as a precaution, and must commute in civilian clothing.

Spangdahlem officials on Saturday said that measures are in place to protect the community but that for “operational security reasons,” the base could not provide more details.

In years past, commands have taken similar action on uniform wearing over concerns about terrorism threats. In 2010, EUCOM issued a directive that temporarily prohibited troops from wearing uniforms off post.

In 2014, EUCOM limited uniform wearing off base to commuting, a restriction that the command began to relax in 2022.

The military sets force protection levels at either Normal, Alpha, Bravo, Charlie or Delta, the highest state of alert. Bravo became common on bases for many years following the 9/11 attacks.

Charlie sets in motion “curtailment plans for nonessential personnel,” according to the Army.

Garrison officials in Stuttgart said that a variety of services would not be available because of the increased threat level. From Sunday until further notice, some of those reduced services included access to some eateries and on-post barber shops.

“Many other services will have significant numbers of employees teleworking or offices will be opened with reduced staff. Customers should maintain flexibility and allow for longer-than-normal service times,” the garrison said in a statement.

In recent weeks, U.S. officials have been sounding the alarm on increased terrorism threats, stemming from the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel and the ongoing war in Gaza.

“We’ve seen the threat from foreign terrorists rise to a whole ‘nother level after October 7,” FBI director Christopher Wray said in June 4 written testimony before the Senate.

Karlsruhe, Germany🇺🇸Do's and Don'ts for Displaying Old GloryBy Susan H. LawsonThis week, American flags will be displaye...
01/07/2024

Karlsruhe, Germany🇺🇸Do's and Don'ts for Displaying Old Glory
By Susan H. Lawson

This week, American flags will be displayed across the nation in celebration of the Independence Day holiday. Following a few guidelines can ensure we are displaying Old Glory properly.

In 1923, the U.S. National Flag Code was created and distributed nationwide. The code became Public Law in 1942 and became the U.S. Flag Code we know today. The U.S. Flag Code lays out the ways to display and respect the flag of the United States.

For example:
• The flag should not be on display outdoors during bad weather.
• The flag should not be used for advertising purposes, or embroidered on cushions, handkerchiefs, napkins or boxes.
• The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding or drapery.
• It should never be displayed upside down unless trying to convey a sign of distress or great danger.
• The flag should never touch anything beneath it; this includes water, merchandise and even the floor.
• When displayed either horizontally or vertically against a wall, the union should be uppermost and to the flag's own right, that is, to the observer's left. When displayed in a window, the flag should be displayed in the same way, with the union or blue field to the left of the observer in the street.

Other Do's and Don'ts:
• Clean and damage-free flags should always be used. Dirty, ripped, wrinkled or frayed flags should not be used. Also, when flags are damaged, they should be destroyed in a dignified manner.
• The U.S. flag should flow freely in the wind or in a lobby with a passing breeze as people walk past. Stretching a flag is a lot like walking around with your arms held out straight. It is not to be held captive by metal arm spreaders as if to say, "Look at me!"
• Staffs and finials should always be upright and not leaning.
• Clamping a U.S. flag to a vehicle's antenna is acceptable, or the flagstaff clamped to the right fender, as long as the flag displays in the proper direction.
• Service flags are displayed in order of service precedence, not the host service where they are displayed. The order of precedence is Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard.
• When displaying the U.S. flag with other flags, the U.S. flag comes first and is centered in the middle of a flag display. In addition, the U.S. flag must be placed higher than the other flags, unless other national flags are present. In that case the U.S. flag would be the same height.
• Buntings are a good way to display the national colors and decorate for Independence Day without discrediting the U.S. flag.

Tokyo, Japan – Shibuya
24/06/2024

Tokyo, Japan – Shibuya

Omaha Beach, France – 80 years of D-Day: Beginning of the end for N**i GermanyIt was the largest such maneuver in histor...
06/06/2024

Omaha Beach, France – 80 years of D-Day: Beginning of the end for N**i Germany

It was the largest such maneuver in history: Operation Overlord, the landing of Allied troops in German-occupied France, had been planned and practiced for months.

Bad weather delayed the operation, but, on June 6, 1944, the time had come. Thousands of ships, supported from the air, took off from the southern coast of England and brought about 150,000 soldiers from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and other Allied countries to the beaches of Normandy. Their goal was to liberate France and then advance on Germany to put an end to N**i rule throughout Europe.

When N**i dictator Adolf Hi**er learned of the invasion, he is said to have gleefully remarked: "As long as they were in England, we couldn't lay our hands on them. Now, we finally have them where we can beat them."

The German army, the Wehrmacht, had indeed been preparing. The coast of occupied France had been heavily secured with bunkers and artillery emplacements, known as the Atlantic Wall. However, the largest German military units were waiting in the wrong place, near Calais, where the English Channel is at its narrowest. The Wehrmacht had fallen for a deliberate deception.

Germans outnumbered, outgunned
It was a battle with heavy losses — on both sides. The Germans fired from their positions at the soldiers coming ashore. Heavy fighting continued inland, behind the beaches and around the villages and towns in the hinterland.

The Germans were outnumbered and outgunned; the tank reserve was their only hope. However, Hi**er left it too late to give the go-ahead for tanks to intervene.

There was a very banal reason for this, military historian Peter Lieb told DW: Hi**er's habit of staying up late and rising up at midday. That's what happened on June 6, 1944.

"That morning, when the tanks should have been deployed quickly, Hi**er was still asleep," Lieb said. "Nobody dared to wake him up, and the High Command of the Wehrmacht did not have the courage to disregard an order from the Führer and just go ahead and deploy the tanks."

Hi**er's unconditional order to never retreat was also to prove fatal. His decree was: "There is no evasion and operation here. It is a case of standing firm — hold or die."

The German soldiers were worn down. "The Allies won," Lieb said, "because they had air supremacy, because they had naval supremacy, because they had the element of surprise and because they had been practicing for this day for months."

On August 25, the Allied Forces liberated Paris. The German occupation of France came to an end soon afterward. The death toll in the few weeks after June 6, 1944, was extremely high on both sides — including among French civilians. Tens of thousands of German and Allied soldiers were killed, as well as thousands of civilians.

World War II would continue for more than nine months, claiming millions more lives.

Germany joins commemorations
The commemoration of D-Day has its own history. For the former Allies, June 6 soon became a fixture for commemoration. The ceremonies in Normandy regularly brought together veterans, Britain's Queen Elizabeth II, the American and French presidents and other heads of state and government.

German dignitaries were not invited for a long time — and the country's leaders had no objections. In 1984, Chancellor Helmut Kohl said "There is no reason for the German chancellor to rejoice when others celebrate their victory in a battle in which tens of thousands of Germans perished miserably."

"Kohl came from a generation that had very much been shaped by the war," Lieb said. "He was close to members of the generation that had lived through the war. And, for them, it would have been unthinkable to celebrate together with American, British and French soldiers."

Slowly, however, the narrative was established that "the landing in Normandy was also the beginning of the end of the German Reich and thus also the beginning of democracy in Germany."

The first German chancellor to attend the D-Day celebrations was Gerhard Schröder, in 2004. Today, the participation of the former enemy, Germany, has become widely accepted. Chancellor Olaf Scholz also intends to take part.

Russia will not take part in 80th D-Day event
This year, one of the most sensitive issues was whether to invite a representative from Russia. D-Day was the beginning of a "second front" in the war, which Soviet leader Josef Stalin had urgently been calling for following the German attack on the Soviet Union in 1941. With an estimated 20 million dead, the Soviet Union had by far the highest number of casualties of all parties in the war.

To honor the Soviet contribution to the victory over N**i Germany, the French hosts invited Russian President Vladimir Putin to the 60th and even the 70th D-Day anniversaries. The latter took place in 2014, just weeks after the Russian annexation of the Crimean Peninsula.

"After 1989/'90, there was great euphoria that the world would be more peaceful, that Russia, as a democratic state, would adopt the Western model of society," Lieb said. That, he added, changed completely with the start of Russia's full-fledged war on Ukraine in 2022.

Despite criticism from the US, UK and Germany, French leaders had considered inviting the Russian ambassador to attend this year's 80th commemoration ceremony, but ultimately decided against it.

"In view of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, which has intensified in recent weeks, the conditions are simply not right," read a message from the office of French President Emmanuel Macron. Russia will not have a representative at the event.

Instead, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will travel to France. Together with Macron, US President Joe Biden, Britain's Prince William, Germany's Olaf Scholz, some of the last surviving veterans and other state guests, he will commemorate 80 years since the original D-Day on the beaches of Normandy.

Wiesbaden, Germany🇺🇸NATO plan to get US troops to the front line to fight RUSSIANATO is drawing up plans to send America...
05/06/2024

Wiesbaden, Germany🇺🇸NATO plan to get US troops to the front line to fight RUSSIA

NATO is drawing up plans to send American troops to the frontlines of Europe in the event of an all-out conflict with Russia, it has been revealed.

New 'land corridors' are being carved out to quickly funnel soldiers through central Europe without local bureaucratic impediments, allowing NATO forces to pounce in an instant should Putin's devastating war in Ukraine move further west.

The plans are said to include contingencies in case of Russian bombardment, letting troops sweep into the Balkans via corridors in Italy, Greece and Turkey, or towards Russia's northern border via Scandinavia, officials told The Telegraph.

Tensions have ratcheted up in recent weeks, with Russian President Vladimir Putin openly acknowledging the 'possibility' of 'a full-scale Third World War' as he threatens 'fatal consequences' for western allies allowing Ukraine use of their weapons on Russian soil.

Ukraine's challenge in repelling the Russian invasion has moved European leaders to take a harder stance on Moscow as the war rages on into its third year, some now threatening to send troops east and making record investments into defense.

According to the plans American soldiers would land at one of five ports across Europe, four allowing access to the western Ukrainian border and a fifth reaching the Russian border via Finland.

NATO already had plans in place for US troops to deploy in the Netherlands before moving towards Poland by train in the event of war.

But amid warnings from Norway's top general that Europe only has two to three years to prepare before Russia could realistically attack the bloc, NATO is said to be exploring possible countermeasures.

The expanded corridors are hoped to offer a failsafe in case logistical or communication lines are severed, shoring up routes to quickly move across Europe should Russia target a member state.

In the event the route through central Europe becomes compromised, allied troops would be able to move through Italy into Slovenia and the Balkans, bypassing the Alps and Switzerland.

The aim of the plans would be to ensure armies could rush through Europe without delays caused by local regulations and checkpoints - as the French government observed difficulty moving tanks through borders on route to Romania.

Greece and Turkey - also both NATO members - could also provide routes through to Romania and towards the southern coast of Ukraine under the plans.

And a fifth route through Norway and Sweden into Finland could allow troops to reach the Russian border in the north since Finland's accession to the bloc in April last year.

NATO leaders agreed last year to prepare 300,000 troops to be kept in a state of high readiness to defend the bloc in case of an attack on a member state - just under half the force Napoleon sent to Russia in his disastrous 1812 campaign.

Russia meanwhile continues to amass forces. The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) thinktank assessed that the Russian military began 2023 with a 'highly disorganized force in Ukraine' of around 360,000 troops, rising to 410,000 by the summer.

By the beginning of this year, they reported, there were 470,000 troops in occupied territories.

In December, NATO tested its readiness for war in Europe with joint tabletop exercises involving the UK and allies in the Baltic.

The exercises aimed at 'clarifying roles and responsibilities', addressing possible challenges of organizing various forces around a common offensive.

France also announced plans in March to deploy 37 Leclerc tanks in Romania to ensure readiness, further strengthening an international battalion in the east.

French President Emmanuel Macron has urged NATO unity against a belligerent Russian aggressor, warning 'the rules of the game has changed' in a recent speech in Paris.

'The fact that war has returned to European soil, and that it is being waged by a nuclear-armed power, changes everything,' he told an audience at the Sorbonne late in April.

Macron warned that Europe is 'not armed against the risks we face' abroad and urged his allies on the continent to avoid overreliance on the US for security.

As Putin and his allies continue to labor threats of nuclear Armageddon - and Russia prepares mobile nuclear bunkers for civilians - Macron has appealed to allies to form a 'European defense initiative' and commit more to spending on defense.

Only in March, US President Joe Biden said there was no need for the US to send more troops to bolster Poland's border ahead of a request for more personnel and military equipment.

Polish officials, as in France, have refused rule out sending troops to meet Russia as it plans to field the biggest army in Europe by 2035.

Warsaw, a historic foe of Moscow, has been warning the west of complacency and rearming since before the invasion, already spending 2.4 per cent of its GDP on defense by 2022 - third after the US and Greece. This rose to around four per cent this year.

Former Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said in November 2022 that Poland must have an army so powerful that 'it does not have to fight due to its strength alone', promising it would have 'the most powerful land forces in Europe' - a role traditionally held by France.

A year later, the UK announced a £4bn air defense deal with Poland 'strengthening European security' by providing Polish forces with enhanced ground-based air defenses capable of taking out incoming threats up to 40km away.

Poland has since agreed a 1.5bn euro deal for the supply of Carl Gustaf M4 recoilless rifles and ammunition, capable of taking out combat vehicles including tanks.

Last March, the US also agreed to sell Poland 800 Hellfire missiles 'and related equipment' worth $150mn, as well as 116 Abrams tanks at $1.4bn.

Warsaw also allowed the US to establish its first permanent garrison in Poland - a mostly symbolic move the US ambassador said was a sign 'the United States is committed to Poland and the NATO alliance, and that we are united in the face of Russian aggression'.

NATO figures show the UK spent around 2.3 per cent on defense in 2023 - a figure Keir Starmer has promised to raise to 2.5 per cent under a Labor government in line with Tory pledges.

At present, however, Britain maintains its smallest army since the Napoleonic era - with a strength of around 75,000.

Last week, a Russian military expert suggested Russia would be able to knock out Britain's nuclear deterrent 'in one day' in the event of an all-out war.

Dr Yuri Baranchik, Deputy Director of the RUSSTRAT Institute, claimed France would likely prove more of a challenge but would likewise be no match for a Russian attack.

Russia has stepped up its rhetoric on the possibility of war as NATO urges wider spending on defense and repeals limits on Ukraine using ally-supplied weapons to fire on Russian targets in Russia.

Asked about the possibility of direct confrontation after securing his fifth term in office in March, Putin said: 'I think everything is possible in the modern world … it is clear to everyone that this will be one step away from a full-scale Third World War.'

Only last week, Putin warned that western countries would suffer 'grave consequences' if they allowed their weapons to be fired from Ukraine into Russia.

'In Europe, especially in small countries, they should be aware what they are playing with,' the Russian president said during a visit to Uzbekistan.

'They should remember that, as countries with small, densely populated territories... They should keep this in mind before talking about striking Russia.'

In December, Putin said to the contrary that Moscow had 'no interest' in attacking NATO, dismissing US President Joe Biden's suggestion that Russia would not stop at Ukraine as 'nonsense'.

'Russia has no reason, no interest — no geopolitical interest, neither economic, political nor military — to fight with NATO countries,' Putin said at the time.

Top Norwegian General General Eirik Kristoffersen has suggested Russia would not yet be a position to strike Europe in any case - but likely could build up its capacity within a matter of years.

'At one point someone said it'll take 10 years, but I think we're back to less than 10 years because of the industrial base that is now running in Russia,' General Kristoffersen said in an interview in Oslo on Monday.

'It will take some time, which gives us a window now for the next two to three years to rebuild our forces, to rebuild our stocks at the same times as we are supporting Ukraine,' he added, noting Putin's public aversion to war with NATO.

Putin has maintained he is open to peace talks, Russian sources telling Reuters last month that the Kremlin is ready to stop the war and recognize current battlefield lines.

Zelenskyy has long maintained that he will not negotiate with Russia directly, but has also urged Western leaders to pressure Russia into peace by 'all means' necessary amid fears Kyiv lacks the resources needed to go on repelling the invasion.

Claiming Russia was dropping 3,200 guided bombs on Ukraine each month, with the war now in its third year, he asked reporters: 'How do you fight that?'

Washington, United States🇺🇸Biden rolls out migration order that aims to shut down asylum requests, after months of antic...
05/06/2024

Washington, United States🇺🇸Biden rolls out migration order that aims to shut down asylum requests, after months of anticipation
By SEUNG MIN KIM, COLLEEN LONG and ELLIOT SPAGAT

President Joe Biden on Tuesday unveiled plans to enact immediate significant restrictions on migrants seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border as the White House tries to neutralize immigration as a political liability ahead of the November elections.

The White House detailed the long-anticipated presidential proclamation signed by Biden, which would bar migrants from being granted asylum when U.S. officials deem that the southern border is overwhelmed. The Democratic president has contemplated unilateral action for months, especially after the collapse of a bipartisan border security deal in Congress that most Republican lawmakers rejected at the behest of Donald Trump, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee.

The order will go into effect when the number of border encounters between ports of entry hits 2,500 per day, according to senior administration officials. That means Biden’s order should go into effect immediately, because that figure is higher than the daily averages now. The restrictions would be in effect until two weeks after the daily encounter numbers are at or below 1,500 per day between ports of entry, under a seven-day average. Those figures were first reported by The Associated Press on Monday.

Once this order is in effect, migrants who arrive at the border but do not express fear of returning to their home countries will be subject to immediate removal from the United States, within a matter of days or even hours. Those migrants would face punishments that could include a five-year bar from reentering the U.S., as well as potential criminal prosecution.

Meanwhile, anyone who expresses that fear or intention to seek asylum will be screened by a U.S. asylum officer but at a higher standard than what is currently used. If they pass the screening, they can pursue more limited forms of humanitarian protection, including the U.N. Convention Against Torture.

Biden’s order was detailed by four senior administration officials who insisted on anonymity to describe the effort to reporters. The directive is coming when the number of migrants encountered at the border have been on a consistent decline since December, but senior administration officials nonetheless justified the order by arguing that the numbers are still too high and that the figures could spike in better weather, when the encounter numbers traditionally increase.

Yet many questions and complications remain about how Biden's new directive would be implemented.

For instance, the Biden administration already has an agreement with Mexico in which Mexico agrees to accept up to 30,000 citizens a month from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela once they are denied entry from the U.S., and senior administration officials say that will continue under this order. But it is unclear what happens to nationals of other countries who are denied under Biden’s directive.

Senior officials also acknowledged that the administration’s goal of deporting migrants quickly is complicated by insufficient funding from Congress to do so. The administration also faces certain legal constraints when it comes to detaining migrant families, although the administration said it would continue to abide by those obligations.

The legal authority being invoked by Biden comes under Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which allows a president to limit entries for certain migrants if it’s deemed “detrimental” to the national interest. Senior officials expressed confidence that they would be able to implement Biden’s order, despite threats from prominent legal groups to sue the administration over the directive.

“We intend to sue," said Lee Gelernt, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union who successfully argued similar legal challenges under Trump. "A ban on asylum is illegal just as it was when Trump unsuccessfully tried it.”

The senior administration officials insisted that Biden’s proposal differs dramatically from that of Trump, who leaned on the same provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act that Biden is using, including his 2017 directive to bar citizens of Muslim-majority nations and his efforts in 2018 to clamp down on asylum.

For instance, Biden’s order outlines several groups of migrants who would be exempted due to humanitarian reasons, including victims of human trafficking, unaccompanied minors and those with severe medical emergencies.

Trump on Tuesday said on his social media account that Biden has “totally surrendered our Southern Border” and that the order was “all for show” ahead of their June 27 presidential debate.

The directive would also exempt migrants who arrive in what senior officials called an orderly fashion, which includes people who make appointments with border officials at ports of entry using the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s CBP One app. About 1,450 appointments are made a day using the app, which launched last year.

Immigration advocates worried that Biden’s plan would only increase an already monthslong backlog of migrants waiting for an appointment through the app, especially when immigration authorities do not have an accompanying surge of funding.

It could also be difficult for border officials to implement the plan to quickly remove migrants when many agents are already tasked with helping in shelters and other humanitarian tasks, said Jennie Murray, the president of the National Immigration Forum.

“Customs and Border Protection cannot keep up with apprehensions as it is right now because they don’t have enough personnel so it would cause more disorder,” she said.

Average daily arrests for illegal crossings from Mexico were last below 2,500 in January 2021, the month that Biden took office. The last time the border encounters dipped to 1,500 a day was in July 2020, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Congressional Republicans dismissed Biden’s order as nothing more than a “political stunt” meant to show toughened immigration enforcement ahead of the election.

“He tried to convince us all for all this time that there was no way he could possibly fix the mess,” GOP House Speaker Mike Johnson said at a news conference. “Remember that he engineered it."

Biden said in January that he has “done all I can do” to control the border through his executive authority, but White House officials nonetheless telegraphed for months that the president would contemplate unilateral action. Democrats note that Biden waited for months in hopes of legislation rather than acting on his own, which can easily be reversed by his successor.

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said that legislation would have been more effective, but “Republican intransigence has forced the president’s hand.”

Yokosuka, Japan – U.S. Navy flagship carrier USS Ronald Reagan leaves its Japan home port after nearly 9 yearsBy EUGENE ...
17/05/2024

Yokosuka, Japan – U.S. Navy flagship carrier USS Ronald Reagan leaves its Japan home port after nearly 9 years
By EUGENE HOSHIKO and MARI YAMAGUCHI

A U.S. Navy strike group's flagship aircraft carrier left its Japanese home port on Thursday, wrapping up nearly nine years of deployment in the Indo-Pacific, where it served a key role in the U.S. effort to bolster defense ties with Japan and other partners in the region.

The departure of USS Ronald Reagan — one of America’s largest warships and a nuclear-powered Nimitz-class aircraft carrier — comes at a time of growing tension in the face of increasingly assertive China in the Indo-Pacific.

It will be replaced later this year by USS George Washington, another Nimitz-class carrier, now on assignment near South America. Japan has been accelerating the buildup of its military capability and significantly increased joint naval operations with the United States.

Family members and friends of the crew were on hand to wave the carrier off from Yokosuka Naval Base after its final patrolling mission earlier in the day.

Hundreds of sailors stood along the rails while others on the flight deck stood forming the Japanese saying “dewa mata,” or “see you." The carrier was accompanied by two guided-missile destroyers, USS Robert Smalls and USS Howard. It is scheduled to transit in Bremerton, Washington, later this year, before heading to a next home port assignment.

Speaking at the ceremony, U.S. Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel ensured a “seamless transition.”

“The USS Ronald Reagan and her crew have ensured that millions of people across the Indo-Pacific have been able to live their lives free of coercion, aggression and suppression,” Emanuel later told reporters.

USS Ronald Reagan first arrived in Yokosuka in 2015. Earlier, during its deployment near the Korean Peninsula, the carrier contributed in Operation Tomodachi, following the 2011 earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster in northeastern Japan.

USS Ronald Reagan was the only American aircraft carrier deployed as a flagship of the Carrier Strike Group 5 under the U.S. Navy's 7th Fleet, to a home port outside the U.S.

During its tenure, it participated in dozens of multilateral exercises and visited more than a dozen foreign ports, including its historic port call to Da Nang, Vietnam, last year.

While tensions have escalated in the South China Sea between China and the Philippines and a number of other countries over maritime and territorial disputes, Japan is concerned about its dispute with China over uninhabited islands in the East China Sea.

Japanese and Chinese coast guard ships repeatedly face off in the waters there.

Former Defense Minister Tomomi Inada, who recently joined an environmental survey trip near the disputed Senkaku islands, which Beijing calls the Diaoyu, said Thursday that cooperation with the U.S. and other like-minded countries is key to defending the international order.

“We have a sense of urgency that we must not let the East China Sea become another South China Sea,” she said.

Landing on the islands is not permitted, so Inada's group flew drones for land and vegetation survey of the area. China protested the trip.

Inada said experts should be able to land on Japan's territory for research, calling for a parliamentary debate.

Adresse

Karlsruhe-Knielingen
76187

Öffnungszeiten

Montag 07:00 - 17:00
Dienstag 07:00 - 17:00
Mittwoch 07:00 - 17:00
Donnerstag 07:00 - 17:00
Freitag 07:00 - 17:00

Benachrichtigungen

Lassen Sie sich von uns eine E-Mail senden und seien Sie der erste der Neuigkeiten und Aktionen von Japanese, American and German Community Office erfährt. Ihre E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht für andere Zwecke verwendet und Sie können sich jederzeit abmelden.

Teilen