11/07/2025
Today, what separates us from our modern predecessors is not the peculiarity of the “I” or the “mine”, but the “we”.
The nation-form which Aristotle, G.W.F. Hegel, and Martin Heidegger lived, for example, can no longer be identified. “We, the People...” is a phrase which makes no sense.
Not only does the “we” no longer refer to those human animals who are present with us, and who represent “our people”, but the “we is not exhausted by the phenomenon of human morphology.
This follows the various advances in machine learning and the “we” should include even non-human animals, as well. Insofar as the “we” is constituted by whatever is shared in an economy of thriving and flourishing together, a problem must be made of this pronoun.
This study takes for granted that a sense of the common, shared, and objective is only possible when the individuals feel secure to disclose the truth.
Only through their disclosure can we experience an interpersonal commerce characterized by a sense of thriving and flourishing together. Only then can we confront the actual and authentic “we”.
However, if we are to recognize anything like an actual and authentic “we”, when and where it manifests, and speak intelligently about “our economy”, then possession of an idea of the “we” is necessary. Therefore, while this study takes as its goal the identification of an idea of the “we”, it does so merely as a catalyst. The realist metaphysics which describes the “we” not only satisfies our want for description, but prescription as well.- Justin Carmien
The subject matter of modern philosophy has gone by various names: the cogito sum, transcendental subject, da sein, or the dividual. However, these descriptions do not merely refer to subject matter for philosophers, but are a description of a “subiectum” which is prior to the world and which ac...