24/07/2026
It happened again. Found at least 4 recent judgments/decisions/rulings where a citation does not match, a quote does not exist in the earlier judgment, the name of the judicial officer given does not match, a link to a PacLii case does not match....
From judicial officers least expected to make those errors. Are we seeing double? AI gone wrong? research officer/secretary gone rogue? Help!
Send a message to learn more