28/09/2026
TITUS 3:10 vs TITUS 1:6 — SAME PAUL, SAME MIA , SAME LETTER(BOOK) — PROOF TRANSLATIONS LIED
"A man that is an heretick after the FIRST (MIA ) and second admonition reject" — Titus 3:10
Would you swear Paul meant "ONE" admonition and SECOND admonition reject? NO, "MIA" there is sequential "FIRST" and the SECOND followed as the text implied.
That's destroyed the claims that mia meant numerical one always and not ordinal first. IT'S INTERCHANGABLE.
They translated it properly as FIRST, agreeing mia can mean both ONE and FIRST, determined by contexts not just lexical guesses.
Same Paul Same pen same letter "Titus" just 2 chapters earlier. Titus 1:6 husband of MIA G3391 wife. Now KJV flips to mia to ONE wife? Same word? How can contexts decide numerical ONE and not ordinal sequential FIRST?
How did they arrived at that, even thou one doesn't agree with the Blameless(above reproach) contexts of the verse and the entire Bible?
MIA is sequential original FIRST and OTHER(titled person's choice) in that contexts, not Numerical One. Giving freedom of monogamy as choice, lawful divorce and remarriage or polygyny for righteous cause and choice as well.
Paul never prescribed MONOGAMY neither POLYGYNY either for bishop/deacon in any MIA verses. Paul meant be married lawfully to YOUTH WIFE. if there is divorce or death, be blameless(above reproach) of the cause.
My deep researches and guidances from Yahuah isn't wrong.
IF YOU THINK I AM WRONG, PROVE THESE 3:
1 — HOW CAN ONE WIFE MAKE A BISHOP ABOVE REPROACH?
BISHOP A — 2 unlawful divorces, but TMH hates unlawful divorce or putting away and treacherous dealing against youth wife. Mal 2:14-16. But now the bishop/deacon is married to only ONE wife at a time, in his third marriage.
Can you say he's reproach? NO,He is accused!
WITNESSES: Ex wives community knows He is not anepileptos Titus 1:6-7 blameless(above reproach) which can blaspheme his title as a bishop or deacon.
Such can't rule the Church with justice and righteousness.
Yet ONE WIFE reading says he is qualified. Because he has ONE WIFE. But ONE WIFE ALONE failed to make him above reproach.
2 HOW CAN FIRST WIFE NOT MAKE HIM ABOVE REPROACH?
It does make above reproach.
Bishop B — Husband of FIRST wife Still has youth wife or she died.
No unlawful divorce or she probably committed whoredom, as per Deut 24:1-4, Matt 19:9, he has lawful cause for divorce. Making him above reproach.
Whether he has 1 wife still or took second lawfully Exod 21:10 He is still husband of FIRST wife First covenant honored, no treachery. SO HE'S ABOVE REPROACH.
First wife test equals faithfulness to youth covenant That is blameless That is Mal 2 qualification.
So FIRST WIFE does make above reproach.
3. HOW CAN POLYGYNY MAKE HIM OF REPROACH THAT YOU THINK PAUL WOULD RECOMMEND ONE WIFE TO BE ABOVE SUCH REPROACH?
If Paul called POLYGYNY as reproach, then the Bible is blasphemed.
TMH Himself in 2 Sam 12:8 "I gave thee thy master house and thy master wives into thy bosom" TMH gave and expanded David's polygyny
Torah: "If he take another wife her food raiment duty not diminish" Exodus 21:10
Torah: "If a man have two wives one beloved one hated" Deut 21:15-17
Jehoiada the priest of TMH in 2 Chron 24:3 took two wives for Joash. Joash was above reproach for his wives.
Prophecy: "Seven women shall take hold of one man to wipe away reproach" Isaiah 4:1. Not bring reproach. FUTURE after Paul and New Testament. Hasn't happened yet.
Fathers: Abraham had many, Jacob 4 wives, Moses at least 2 wives, David had at least 18, Elkanah at least 2. All above reproach.
If polygyny equals reproach, then God gave David reproach, commanded inheritance and sexual duties in reproach, Joash the king lived reproach which was given by JEHOIADA the priest.
Making Torah unholy.
Romans 7:12 says Law is HOLY, So ONE WIFE above reproach reading accuses Torah as UNHOLY. That is BLASPHEMIES
What is reproach? Unlawful divorce Putting away youth wife treacherously Mal 2 That is the reproach Paul was targeting.
You can have two wives that fights each other, that's their reproach, it you. Same as one wife can harass you publicly or do reproachable things. That's her reproach not yours.
CONCLUSION:
Paul used MIA because it's sequential.
PROVEN:
▫️Titus 3:10 FIRST and second.
▫️Titus 1:6 FIRST wife and other(choice)
▫️1 Tim 3:2 the same FIRST WIFE
▫️1 Tim 3:12 for deacons the same FIRST WIFE.
▫️1 Tim 5:9 widows MIA husband = FIRST husband. Not one husband ever.
Freedom of monogamy, divorce, remarriage or polygyny for righteous cause. That's the purpose of Paul using Mia(sequential first) and not protos(very first only).
🕊️
