29/07/2026
Restrictive Physical Intervention - the Government recently updated its guidance on the use of Restrictive Intervention in schools. Whilst there are some positives (in theory), there are also a lot of concerns:
1. Restrictive interventions are more firmly embedded in everyday school policy.
2. Planned restrictive interventions are included within behaviour and support plans.
3. Seclusion is explicitly recognised within the guidance.
4. Only "significant" incidents must be recorded, but "significant" is not precisely defined.
5. Schools determine when restrictive interventions are necessary and proportionate.
6. Schools are largely responsible for reviewing their own decisions.
7. Parents are informed when interventions occur, but there is little emphasis on co-producing, approving or challenging restrictive practice plans.
8. Disabled children are disproportionately subject to restrictive interventions.
9. The guidance relies on staff understanding neurodivergence, trauma and communication needs, despite longstanding concerns about the consistency of training.
10. Distress, anxiety and sensory overload are often interpreted as challenging behaviour.
11. The guidance promotes prevention but provides little detail on the resources needed to deliver it effectively.
12. There is little detail on how families can challenge inaccurate records or repeated use of restrictive interventions.
13. The guidance strengthens governance and recording requirements, which will increase administrative workload.
14. How will the use of restrictive interventions be independently monitored alongside the move towards earlier intervention and greater professional discretion?