Live, Laugh, Lockup with Leanne

Live, Laugh, Lockup with Leanne Awareness, not Advocacy. True crime • Pop culture • Real stories ⛓️‍💥Cases, crime & offending patterns. 💅🏻The serious, the silly & everything between

26/09/2026

I’m not here to try to convince anyone.

I present what I have, with the evidence to support it. What you choose to do with that information is entirely up to you. If you choose to ignore the evidence, dismiss it or believe something else, that’s on you.

I can only put the facts in front of people. What they choose to believe is their decision. Some people get very uncomfortable when the version of themselves they’ve presented to others no longer matches what the evidence shows and the half truths and false allegations, that are often confessions, start to pour out. I don’t say anything publicly that I can’t back up with evidence and I just want people to know, that if they choose to believe a different version of the truth without evidence, they are making a conscious choice to enable and empower those that threaten the safety of women and children. You’re not an innocent party. You’re making a choice and any consequences of that choice are your own doing. With that being said, my health took a dive for a couple of weeks, I’m starting to feel bit better. Episode 2 of Pred Protector is coming soon as is my petitions and updates on cases I’ve previously covered.

🔴Should parents face consequences when their children repeatedly offend?I’m interested in hearing people’s views on this...
22/09/2026

🔴Should parents face consequences when their children repeatedly offend?

I’m interested in hearing people’s views on this.
Earlier this year I asked the Scottish Government to introduce a tiered system of support and accountability for parents of children who repeatedly offend. The idea was straightforward:
• Start with genuine, practical support for parents who are struggling.
• Escalate only when parents refuse to engage or when their child continues to reoffend.
• In the most serious and persistent cases, allow for meaningful consequences.
This formed part of my petition PE2196. The Scottish Government rejected that part of my proposal.

Meanwhile, in England and Wales, the approach appears to be moving in the opposite direction.

On 19 September 2026, Youth Justice Minister Jake Richards set out plans to strengthen parental responsibility as part of reforms to the youth justice system in England and Wales.
He said the system “should hold parents to account in a proportionate way for ensuring that they play their role in keeping communities safe.”
Under the proposals, Parenting Orders (already available in limited form) would be expanded and toughened. Possible consequences for parents could include:
• Higher fines
• Loss of benefits
• In the most extreme cases, a custodial sentence (at the discretion of a judge)

Richards described this as a “carrot-and-stick” approach. The aim is to get parents more actively involved in efforts to turn young offenders around, while also creating clearer consequences when that involvement is refused.
He stressed that prison would only be considered in the most serious situations.

Two different approaches
Scotland has so far chosen not to go down this route. England and Wales are actively considering stronger tools that place greater responsibility on parents.
I’m interested in what people think.
Do you support a system that offers real support first, but also carries the possibility of consequences for parents of persistent young offenders? Or do you believe the focus should remain solely on the child, with no formal accountability for parents?
I’d genuinely like to hear a range of views.

22/09/2026

🚨A 14yr old boy plotted, waited, then 🔪 a 14yr old girl at least 10 times in a shop because she rejected him.
He also 🔪 the shopkeeper who tried to save her.
His sentence?
A 12-month referral order.
No prison.
The judge said he’s “not a danger” and was “surprised” the boy even spent 3 months on remand.
This is what youth justice looks like in the UK right now.
Petitions coming soon:
1. Take non-contact and peer-on-peer s*xual offending seriously in Scotland
2. Strengthen youth justice thresholds, custody security and victims’ protections
Enough is enough.

🚨Cardiff man who sought ‘paedo woman’ to have children to abuse handed suspended sentence.A 49-year-old Cardiff man foun...
17/09/2026

🚨Cardiff man who sought ‘paedo woman’ to have children to abuse handed suspended sentence.

A 49-year-old Cardiff man found with hundreds of indecent images of children, including some as young as 12 months old, has been given a suspended prison sentence after telling undercover officers he wanted a “paedo woman” so they could have children to abuse.
John Price, of Clos Glanaber in Trowbridge, appeared at Cardiff Crown Court where he pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children and three counts of distributing them.
Police attended his home on 6 June after receiving intelligence that he was sharing indecent images online. Officers said Price initially asked to speak outside before walking quickly into the kitchen and appearing to throw something. It later emerged he had discarded his Samsung phone in an attempt to conceal it. The device was recovered and examined.
Investigators found 467 Category A images, 327 Category B images and 406 Category C images on the phone, along with 18 extreme pornographic images. The youngest children depicted in the Category A material were aged between 12 and 24 months.
Prosecutor Christopher Evans told the court that Price had also taken part in online conversations with undercover police officers posing as people interested in child s*xual abuse. During those chats he distributed a total of 22 Category A images, five Category B images and eight Category C images.
In the messages, Price said he was “no lim” (had no s*xual limitations) and stated: “Unfortunately not yet a dad, I need a paedo woman lol.” He said his preferred ages were “five plus” and later “four plus,” adding that he “loved them young” and “had no limits.”
When speaking to an operative who claimed to have an eight-year-old niece, Price expressed interest in meeting them and said he “would love to have a daughter of his own.” He also sent a video of a child being abused and suggested it could be shown to the child.
The court heard Price had no previous convictions for similar offences, though he had earlier convictions for assault by beating and assaulting emergency workers.
In mitigation, defence barrister Nick Gedge said the majority of the images on the phone were inaccessible and that Price denied having a s*xual interest in children. He told the court his client had been using crack co***ne extensively and had fallen down an “internet rabbit hole.” Price, a former care assistant, had lost both of his parents, was no longer working, and had faced a community backlash that forced him to leave his home.
Recorder Paul Lewis KC rejected the suggestion that Price was not s*xually attracted to children.
Price was sentenced to 33 months’ imprisonment, suspended for three years. He was also ordered to complete a 25-day rehabilitation activity requirement and was made subject to an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order and indefinite s*x offender notification requirements.
The case was reported by WalesOnline following the sentencing hearing.

16/09/2026

Imagine not liking her because your abusive son or brother did her wrong and she finally stood up for herself. Now imagine enabling his abuse by continuing to support him rather than holding him accountable. What a toxic family dynamic.

The family knew.

That's the part that needs to be said directly.

Families always know more than they claim to know when the accountability arrives. The signs were there — in the way she got quieter at gatherings, in the way he spoke to her when he thought no one was paying attention, in the small moments that were individually dismissible and collectively undeniable.

They dismissed them.

Individually.

And when she finally reached the point of standing up for herself — of naming what was happening, of refusing to absorb it quietly anymore, of doing the terrifying thing of leaving or speaking or drawing a line that couldn't be crossed again —

They chose him.

Not reluctantly. Not after a genuine wrestling with what they knew. With the swiftness of people who had already decided, long before this moment, that family loyalty outweighed female safety.

And now they don't like her.

The woman their son or brother abused.

They don't like her because she survived him loudly enough to make the survival impossible to ignore. Because she stopped making it convenient for everyone around her to pretend nothing was happening. Because her standing up for herself required them to look at what they'd been enabling and they found the looking too uncomfortable.

So they blamed her instead.

The audacity of that inversion is stunning.

She was harmed.

She spoke.

They turned it into a character flaw on her part.

And he — the one who did the harm — remains protected. Defended. provided with the family infrastructure that allows him to move forward without consequence. To do what abusive people do when their behavior produces no accountability in the people closest to them.

He'll do it again.

To someone else.

With the full support of a family who decided that holding him accountable was more threatening to their comfort than allowing him to continue.

That's not loyalty.

That's complicity.

Dressed in the language of family.

15/09/2026

Every institution who is in place to safeguard the children in this country are aware of what has been going on. I can’t publicly share every detail so I am only focusing on the child risk in this post. These institutions have been aware for a significant amount of time. This is not a one off, this is repeated acts that have been happening for the last 14 years. I didn’t start reporting it until 2021, I didn’t make a safeguarding report until 2022. When the boy was criminally charged I challenged these institutions on not safeguarding that boy previously and they denied responsibility. I have years of evidence, many reports, hours of cctv footage and this abuse of children is being allowed to continue. They are failing the children around these adults. I have stood alone against this family. They had a man round after I reported their son for the criminal offence, he was seen looking into my garden and heard saying “I’m just looking to see where the cameras are”. I am subjected to harassment, intimidation, vandalism of my property and had my pets targeted just because I refuse to stay quiet. Thousands have watched the live stream, some have laughed because they don’t understand the seriousness of this situation. Myself and my family are at risk, I’ve got a marker on my address because of this family but my concern has always been for their children and now, their grandchild.

JIMS affiliated accounts mocking the death on my toddler and abusing SA & DV survivors on TikTok.The Monitor was falsely...
14/09/2026

JIMS affiliated accounts mocking the death on my toddler and abusing SA & DV survivors on TikTok.

The Monitor was falsely claiming I support Lindsey Clancy. I have attached examples of the nasty comments made under their videos. I didn’t watch anything to do with this case as my child passed from neck injuries and therefore the way these kids passed away is not something I want to hear about. I have personally informed The Monitor that I didn’t watch the case but they continue to spread lies and get excited by upset survivors in their comments.

JIMS members/followers are repeating these false allegations and commenting all over the internet that I support a woman I know very little about, right around the time Marsha Sturgeon was mocking my child’s memorial soft toys. There is several accounts, most hiding behind anon accounts, targeting survivors online and making outrageous false allegations. If you support Justice for Innocent Men Scotland, this is the type of sick behaviour you are defending

User###372 is Kirsty McDermott who started JIMS. Lynnie is Lynne Beveridge whose son started graping and abusing at 16/17 years old. Techno Girl is Roisin Irvine whose partner graped a 16yr old girl and Marsha sturgeons partner graped two previous partners.

14/09/2026

Where did RR get the address? Is it even truly her street? If she’s so scared, why is she promising a YouTube video? I will never show public sympathy towards this woman and I don’t believe her children are at risk. However I don’t want any harm to come to anyone, everyone knows my stance on violence. Revenge isn’t justice imo but I don’t believe she’s at risk at all. RR should check their sources because this happened immediately after she claimed harassment when she was approached at the IFAD protest. There was no evidence of harassment, JIMS falsified screenshots to falsely accuse people of being involved who were not involved and then her “address” is leaked. I’m not buying it for a minute. She claims to own properties, plural!! So why can’t she just move into another one? My guess is she’s been inspired by Danny Tommo, wait for the begging to commence, go fund me link coming soon no doubt.

Address

Glasgow

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Live, Laugh, Lockup with Leanne posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share