18/06/2026
A storm of political reactions has erupted after the Minority Leader Frederick delivered a blistering criticism of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration, declaring that the government has failed Nigerians, especially in the areas of security, leadership direction, and national welfare.
He insisted that the President has not met constitutional responsibility as outlined in the duty of government to secure lives and property, stressing that when leadership fails, citizens and lawmakers have the right to demand performance or resignation.
According to him, the Tinubu-led government is not just struggling but is “much more than clueless”, adding that the situation in the country reflects deep governance failure.
He questioned the President directly, saying if the government cannot deliver, then “the President should resign”, arguing that democracy allows citizens and lawmakers to openly demand accountability.
He further referenced past political positions he held, stating that he had previously declared that former administrations failed, insisting that his current stance is consistent with his belief that leadership must be judged by results.
On insecurity, he painted a grim picture of the nation, citing ongoing killings, kidnappings, and instability across regions. He specifically referenced the death of three generals in captivity or security-related operations, describing it as a shocking failure of national security architecture.
He also questioned how such high-level military losses could occur without strong national response, asking why the country appears to move on as though nothing serious has happened.
He criticized the President’s movements and responses during crises, citing the Jos visit where the President reportedly left without fully engaging affected communities due to operational issues at the airport, and contrasting it with expectations of direct leadership presence in crisis zones.
He also mentioned insecurity cases such as abducted children and ongoing attacks in states like Oyo, questioning why the President did not personally visit affected communities such as Ibadan, instead sending aides and security chiefs.
He argued that while insecurity continues, the government is distracted by political activities and image campaigns, including what he described as “Renewed Hope” branding, which he said has not translated into real improvement on the ground.
He further accused the administration of misplaced priorities, saying instead of focusing fully on security funding and protecting lives, attention is being given to political projects and campaigns.
He also criticized what he described as distribution of vehicles and campaign-style empowerment, arguing that such actions send the wrong message while citizens are facing kidnappings and killings.
He added that even in international comparisons, leaders show stronger symbolic presence during military losses, questioning why Nigerian leadership does not show similar urgency and emotional responsibility.
Responding to claims by the government that terrorists are being eliminated and some rescues have been made, he insisted that the reality on the ground does not reflect sufficient progress, stressing that Nigerians are still living in fear.
He concluded by insisting that governance must be about responsibility, not politics, warning that if performance does not improve within a short period, public pressure for accountability and possible change will continue to grow.
The comments have since triggered intense debate across political and social circles, with supporters and critics sharply divided over the accusations.
