Agbo Moses Vitus

Agbo Moses Vitus *Human right activist/Journalist
*Humanity/Freedom first
*Critics to evils

I'm a Biafran���?

19/12/2025

‎Tears full my eyes watching this. But then, they are people who connived with others to fight Biafrans during the 1966-70 pogroms, but they are human that doesn't deserve butchering.

Just In:Today 18th December 2025, Bishop Mathew Hazzan Kukah finally met with the leader of the indigenous people of Bia...
18/12/2025

Just In:

Today 18th December 2025, Bishop Mathew Hazzan Kukah finally met with the leader of the indigenous people of Biafra , Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, at the Sokoto Correctional Center. Their conversations were mostly filled with laughter and extreme joy. He prayed alongside his team of faithfuls.

Breaking Good:Florida Designates Muslim Brotherhood, Islamic Council CAIR As Terrorist Organisations Under New Executive...
09/12/2025

Breaking Good:Florida Designates Muslim Brotherhood, Islamic Council CAIR As Terrorist Organisations Under New Executive Order

09/12/2025
07/12/2025
04/12/2025

KC have learnt in a hard way. He now adjusted his brain to acknowledge the fact that he is a Biafran.

I visited Tinubu for Nnamdi Kanu’s release, not defection to APC – OttiAbia State Governor Alex Otti has said that he vi...
04/12/2025

I visited Tinubu for Nnamdi Kanu’s release, not defection to APC – Otti

Abia State Governor Alex Otti has said that he visited President Bola Tinubu to discuss the release of the jailed leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, not over defection to the All Progressives Congress, APC, contrary to reports in some quarters.

30/11/2025

Video 🎥: FLASHBACK: Reno Omokri Once Swore He’d Never Work With Tinubu, Now Nominated As Ambassador

The Abuja Federal High Court judgment which convicted the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, ...
25/11/2025

The Abuja Federal High Court judgment which convicted the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu, violated provisions of Nigeria’s Constitution, a human rights lawyer, Christopher Chidera, has declared.

Kanu, who was sentenced to life imprisonment following his conviction on terrorism charges filed against him by the Nigerian government, is currently serving the prison term at the Sokoto Correctional Centre.

20/11/2025

Breaking news: Mazi Nnamdi Kanu resisted Omotosho's move to jail him unlawfully. Injustice Omotosho you are doomed now and forever.Anyone advising Justice Omotosho to continue doing the bidden of the Nigeria terrorist government is wasting his time.

THREAD OF COURT ROOM EXCHANGES BETWEEN KANU AND JUSTICE OMOTOSHODate: 19th November 2025.(With Page Numbers, and Why the...
19/11/2025

THREAD OF COURT ROOM EXCHANGES BETWEEN KANU AND JUSTICE OMOTOSHO

Date: 19th November 2025.

(With Page Numbers, and Why the Omotosho J, Was Wrong in Law. From court records of 23 Oct. 2025)

PAGE 35 of Court Records — Kanu Raises Oral Jurisdictional Objection
KANU:
“My lord, this is a brief oral argument… the court lacks jurisdiction to try me.”

LAW:
Jurisdiction can be raised orally, at any time, even on appeal.
FRN v Dasuki (2018) – Objection to jurisdiction must be heard immediately.
Madukolu v Nkemdilim (1962) – Jurisdiction is the lifeblood of adjudication.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.

PAGE 36 — Objection From Prosecution
AWOMOLO SAN:
“He should have filed a process… he should identify what he wants to say.”

COURT:
“Objection overruled.”

LAW:
FRN v Dasuki (2018) – Jurisdiction can be taken without affidavit where based on the record before the court (ex facie record).
Section 6(6)(b) Constitution — court has inherent power to determine its competence.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.
Even the judge correctly overruled the SAN here.

PAGE 36–37 — Kanu States the Four Jurisdictional Defects
KANU:
“There are four jurisdictional vitiating defects… each fatal… cumulative they render the entire trial incompetent.”

He lists:

FG in contempt of Court of Appeal ruling.
Repealed law being used.
Violation of Section 122 Evidence Act.
Denial of fair hearing.
LAW:
AG Lagos v. Dosunmu (1989) – proceedings under repealed laws are void.
Section 122(2)(a) Evidence Act – repeal must be judicially noticed.
NNPC v Fawenhimi (1998) – ignorance of statutory repeal nullifies proceedings.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.

PAGE 38–39 — Kanu Expands on Repeal
KANU:
“It is very clear my lord… it is statutory… no discretion… everything we have been doing is under a repealed Act.”

LAW:
Repeal removes legal foundation of all charges.
Proceedings under repealed Act = void ab initio (Fawenhimi).
Section 36 Constitution — fair hearing includes lawful charge.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.

PAGE 40 — Kanu Raises Denial of Fair Hearing
KANU:
“I was permitted only three hours… in a capital offence… this is judicial perversity.”

LAW:
Section 36 Constitution — adequate time and facilities is mandatory.
Edibo v The State (2007) – rushed defence violates fair hearing.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.

PAGE 47 — Judge Begins to Shut Down Jurisdiction Discussion
COURT:
“I reiterate the ruling… that all preliminary objections shall be determined in the final written address.”

LAW:
FRN v Dairo (2015):
396(2) ACJA CANNOT be used to defer jurisdiction.
Dasuki (2018):
Court MUST decide jurisdiction immediately.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.
❌ Judge is wrong in law.

PAGE 48 — Kanu Reminds the Court Again
KANU:
“My lord, the issue of jurisdiction cannot be deferred. It cannot wait.”

COURT:
“You may appeal after I have ruled.”

LAW:
Section 294(1) Constitution –
Every decision MUST be in writing.
No written ruling exists in the entire record.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.
❌ The judge is telling him to “appeal” what is not in writing.
This is unconstitutional.

PAGE 49 — Judge Admits He Has Not Examined the Repealed Law Issue
COURT:
“I have not said whether the law is relevant or not relevant now.”

This is catastrophic.

LAW:
Section 122 Evidence Act – mandatory judicial notice of repeal.
NIMASA v Fawenhimi – failure to recognize repeal nullifies proceedings.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.
❌ Judge openly refuses to determine validity of charge.

PAGE 50 — The Fatal Statement
COURT:
“I have ruled.”
“When court rules, your remedy is to appeal.”
“I will not entertain any preliminary objection now.”

But there is no written ruling anywhere.

LAW:
Section 294(1) Constitution —
No decision exists until it is written, signed, and delivered.
Skye Bank v Iwu (2017) —
Only written ruling is appealable.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.
❌ Judge is wrong.
❌ This is a constitutional breach.
❌ No appeal can lie from a non-existent ruling.

PAGE 55–56 — Judge Repeats the Illegality
COURT:
“I have made an order that all those issues be put in abeyance till final written address.”
“I won’t take any argument on preliminary objection.”

LAW:
Dairo (2015): jurisdiction cannot be deferred.
Dasuki (2018): jurisdiction must be decided immediately.
Madukolu — court proceeding without jurisdiction = nullity.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.
❌ Judge is acting per incuriam.

PAGE 54–58 — Kanu Pleads for Fair Hearing, Judge Insists on Defence
KANU:
“Section 36 gives me adequate facilities… seized materials… I need time… repealed law must be recognised…”

COURT:
“Open your defence. The time starts to run today.”

LAW:
Court cannot compel defence under a void charge.
Tukur v Govt of Gongola State —
Once jurisdiction is challenged, court must stop.
Section 36 Constitution — adequate facilities are non-negotiable.
WHO IS RIGHT?
➡ Kanu.
❌ Judge is wrong to force a constitutional nullity forward.

FINAL SUMMARY
Kanu’s Position (Legally Correct):
✔ Jurisdiction cannot wait
✔ Oral objection is valid
✔ Repeal must be judicially noticed
✔ Charge under repealed law is void
✔ No fair hearing in rushed defence
✔ Written ruling is mandatory
✔ ACJA 396(2) CANNOT suspend jurisdiction

Omotosho’s Position (Legally Wrong):
❌ Claims to have “ruled” without writing
❌ Refuses mandatory jurisdiction ruling
❌ Defers objection to final address
❌ Forcing defence under void charge
❌ Ignores Supreme Court authority
❌ Violates Section 294 and 36 Constitution

PRESS BRIEFINGRising Sun Foundation for Justice and Human RightsWashington, D.C., USANovember 17, 2025FOR IMMEDIATE RELE...
17/11/2025

PRESS BRIEFING
Rising Sun Foundation for Justice and Human Rights
Washington, D.C., USA
November 17, 2025

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NIGERIA'S SERIAL CONTEMPT OF COURT:
A Decade of Judicial Fraud in the Persecution of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu – The World Must Hold the Nigerian State Accountable
Washington, D.C. – As Nigeria’s Federal High Court in Abuja prepares to deliver what may become one of the most legally disastrous judgments in modern African history on November 20, 2025, the Rising Sun Foundation for Justice and Human Rights issues this urgent global alert: Nigeria has entered its tenth consecutive year of orchestrated judicial fraud and open constitutional sabotage in the politically motivated persecution of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. The Nigerian state, its security agencies, its prosecution teams, and even sections of its judiciary—including Justice James Omotosho—have become serial violators of the rule of law, repeatedly acting in open contempt of court orders locally, regionally, and internationally.

This is not a judicial process.
It is state-engineered persecution and a sustained attempt to criminalize dissent by destroying the very Constitution Nigeria claims to uphold.

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, a British based political activist and leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has been unlawfully detained for over four years following a criminal abduction from Kenya in June 2021—an act already condemned as illegal rendition by courts in both Nigeria and Kenya, and by multiple United Nations bodies.

Despite eight separate judicial victories spanning eight years, none of which have ever been appealed or set aside lawfully, Nigeria continues its prosecution campaign built on repealed laws, jurisdictionally void charges, fabricated evidence, and judicial panels handpicked to validate predetermined outcomes.

The Rising Sun Foundation calls on the United States, European Union, United Kingdom, African Union, UN Human Rights Council, and the International Criminal Court to intervene immediately. Nigeria’s actions now threaten not only Igbo rights but regional stability for all of West Africa.

Chronology of Unchallenged Judicial Victories Nigeria Continues to Violate
Below is the undisputed legal record—eight rulings in favor of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu between 2017 and 2025.
Nigeria complied with none.
Every ruling stands unappealed and remains binding.
Nigeria’s defiance is not accidental; it is systematic.

1. 2017 – Federal High Court, Abuja (Justice Binta Nyako)
The court ruled unequivocally that IPOB is NOT a terrorist or unlawful organization, demolishing the core of the current so-called terrorism trial. Several charges were struck out for lack of evidence. This judgment remains the law today, unchallenged and binding.

2. 2019 – African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
The ACHPR found IPOB non-violent, non-terrorist, and protected under Articles 9, 10, and 11 of the African Charter. It condemned Nigeria’s actions as ethnic discrimination against Igbos. This ruling binds Nigeria under Article 1 of the Charter. Zero compliance.

3. 2022 – Federal High Court, (Umuahia Division)
The court declared Kanu’s abduction from Kenya a flagrant violation of domestic and international law, ordered his release, and nullified all charges arising from the illegal rendition. Nigeria never appealed. Nigeria never complied.

4. 2022 – Abia State High Court (Justice Benson Anya)
The court confirmed the 2017 “Operation Python Dance” military invasion of Kanu’s home as an attempted assassination carried out by Nigerian security forces. No appeal. No accountability.

5. October 13, 2022 – Court of Appeal, Abuja Division (Hanatu Sankey, Oladotun Adefope-Okojie, Ebiowei Tobi JJCA)
A historic ruling:
Kanu was discharged and acquitted of all charges, with the court holding that a retrial is constitutionally prohibited under Section 36(9) CFRN due to double jeopardy and the illegality of his rendition.
This acquittal is final in Nigerian law.
Yet Nigeria ignored it—and instead engineered judicial fraud through, Tsammani JCA, to undo it.

6. 2022 – UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (Opinion No. 38/2022)
The UN found his detention arbitrary, discriminatory, and unlawful across all categories, and demanded immediate release and reparations. Nigeria remains in open violation.

7. 2023 – High Court of Enugu State (Justice Onuoha Onovo)
The court held that the Nigerian state’s treatment of IPOB members amounts to systemic ethnic discrimination against the Igbo people. The ruling stands; Nigeria ignores it.

8. 2025 – Kenyan High Court
The court ruled that Kenya never authorised Kanu’s transfer and that the operation was an illegal rendition violating Kenyan sovereignty. It ordered redress and accountability. Nigeria refuses to comply, worsening diplomatic fallout.

Together, these rulings prove one thing: Nigeria is running a politically scripted persecution, not a lawful prosecution.

The Tsammani Rogue Panel: A Judicial Conspiracy to Bury a Constitutional Acquittal
Nigeria’s most egregious judicial fraud occurred in October 2022. After the legitimate Court of Appeal acquittal on October 13, the Nigerian government convened a contrived, improperly constituted panel led by Justice Muhammad Lawal Tsammani.

In a move never seen in Nigerian, African, or Commonwealth jurisprudence, the rogue panel invoked Order 6 Rule 1 of the Court of Appeal Rules— a civil procedure provision — to “stay” a criminal acquittal.

This is illegal on its face.
You cannot use civil procedure to reverse a criminal acquittal.
Not in Nigeria.
Not in the UK.
Not in the U.S.
Not anywhere in the world.

Supreme Court judgments such as Abacha v. State and FRN v. Anache forbid such doctrinal cross-contamination.

The Tsammani ruling was not law.
It was judicial sabotage engineered by the executive branch and remains the cornerstone of the current constitutional crisis.

Ongoing Contempt: Prosecution Defies Acquittal; Justice Omotosho Defies Constitution and Supreme Court
Nigeria remains in contempt through:

Justice James Omotosho’s Open Constitutional Defiance
Despite the Supreme Court’s explicit order to amend Count 7 to align with an extant statute, Omotosho knowingly forced Kanu to plead to a void, repealed, and non-existent law—first Criminal Code Cap C45 (repealed), then Customs & Excise Management Act 2004 (also repealed).

He then refused to address:

the double criminality requirement under TPPA 2022
the constitutional bar on prosecution under a repealed law (CFRN §36(12))
the binding 2022 Court of Appeal acquittal
multiple domestic orders mandating Kanu’s release
the existence of a formal Arrest of Judgment motion
He has foreclosed addresses, shut down jurisdictional objections without hearing, and now plans to deliver judgment—an act that would be a void judicial nullity.

This is not judicial error.
It is deliberate collaboration with executive misconduct.

Call to Action: The World Must Act Now
Nigeria’s persistent disobedience has placed it in breach of:

its own Constitution,
the African Charter,
UN conventions,
international comity, and
basic principles of fair trial and anti-rendition law.
The Rising Sun Foundation demands:

Immediate enforcement of all existing acquittals and court orders.
International sanctions on Nigerian officials responsible for disobedience.
UN Human Rights Council inquiry into Nigeria’s systemic judicial abuses.
Global pressure to force compliance with domestic and international rulings.

Nigeria is on the brink of destroying its judiciary beyond repair.
A state that refuses to obey its own courts is a state collapsing from within.

We stand firmly with Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the Igbo nation, and every Nigerian demanding justice.

The world must stand with us.

For Interviews/Media Inquiries:
Rev. Fr. (Dr.) Augustine Odinmegwa, Director
Rising Sun Foundation, USA

End of Briefing

Address

London

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Agbo Moses Vitus posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Agbo Moses Vitus:

Share

Category