Laudzer Life Sciences Pvt Ltd

02/01/2026

Beyond Politics: Why a Shared Public Health Understanding Is Essential for Zimbabwe’s National Development Agenda

By Lloyd Gideon Makonese - An Academic & A Public Health and Health Policy/Systems Expert

As Zimbabwe advances its long-term development vision through successive national strategies and a renewed commitment to sustainable growth, the country is presented with an opportunity that extends beyond policy implementation. It is an opportunity to shape how citizens, professionals, and institutions understand and engage with national priorities. At the centre of this moment lies a critical question. How can development goals be embraced as collective public responsibilities rather than interpreted narrowly through political lenses?

National development frameworks are, by design, instruments for societal progress. In the health sector, they seek to improve access to care, strengthen prevention, enhance system resilience, and safeguard population well-being. These objectives rely on a wide ecosystem of actors including clinicians, public health practitioners, transport and infrastructure planners, educators, researchers, and community leaders. Their effectiveness depends not only on political leadership, but also on professional engagement and public understanding.

An important concern arises when national initiatives are viewed primarily as political projects. While political leadership is essential in setting direction and mobilising resources, an over-politicised interpretation of development strategies risks obscuring their technical, professional, and human purpose. When citizens perceive health and development agendas as belonging exclusively to politicians, misinformation can flourish and meaningful participation may diminish. Over time, this can weaken implementation and undermine long-term outcomes.

A public health perspective offers a useful corrective. Public health, by its nature, is concerned with collective action, evidence-informed decision-making, and shared responsibility. It recognises that health outcomes are shaped not only in clinical settings, but also through transport systems, housing, environmental planning, education, and social cohesion. Safer transportation systems, for example, are not political statements. They are preventative interventions that reduce injury, disability, and premature death. When such measures are misunderstood as political messaging rather than public safeguards, communities may disengage, with consequences that affect families and livelihoods.

There is therefore a need for a more balanced national discourse. Political leaders are encouraged to continue articulating development priorities in ways that foreground professional integrity, public benefit, and inclusivity. Equally, citizens are urged to approach national initiatives with critical awareness rather than reflexive politicisation. Not every policy announcement is a partisan signal. Many are technical responses to real and pressing societal needs.

This distinction matters. Persistent misinterpretation and misinformation can gradually erode trust, fragment public engagement, and compromise the effectiveness of development strategies. In the long term, such dynamics risk slowing progress and limiting the transformative potential of national plans. Development strategies succeed when they are understood, owned, and acted upon by the broader society, not when they are confined to political debate.

Importantly, a shared public health understanding does not require the absence of critique. Constructive scrutiny, accountability, and dialogue remain essential. However, these should be grounded in evidence, context, and an appreciation of collective goals. When public discourse shifts from polarisation to informed engagement, space is created for collaboration between government, professionals, communities, and the diaspora.

Zimbabwe’s development ambitions rest on unity of purpose as much as on policy design. By encouraging citizens to look beyond political framing and to recognise national health and development strategies as shared societal commitments, the country strengthens its capacity to deliver lasting change. In doing so, development agendas are protected from distortion and positioned as living frameworks that serve all Zimbabweans, leaving no one untouched and no one behind.

14/12/2025

Why Zimbabwe Needs an Integrated Approach to Health

Zimbabwe’s health challenges cannot be solved by one system alone. In everyday life, people move between clinics, churches, and traditional healers, guided by culture, faith, access, and trust. This reality should inform how health services are designed and delivered.

Traditional practices offer cultural meaning and trusted entry points. Religious institutions provide counselling, spiritual support, and social protection. Contemporary health services bring scientific diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Each plays a role. Problems arise when they work in isolation rather than in partnership.

Integrating traditional, religious, and modern health services does not weaken medicine. It strengthens trust, improves access, and supports early referral, especially for mental health, substance misuse, chronic illness, and HIV.

Zimbabwe’s health future depends on dialogue, respect, and collaboration. When culture, faith, community, and science work together, health services become more effective, humane, and responsive to real lives.

14/12/2025

Why Community Health Works Best When Communities and Government Work Together

Across Zimbabwe, many health challenges continue to persist not because solutions are unavailable, but because they are often disconnected from the realities of communities they are meant to serve. Issues such as substance and drug misuse, mental health distress, non-communicable diseases, and delayed access to care require responses that are both nationally coordinated and locally grounded.

Government plays a critical role in setting policy direction, allocating resources, and maintaining health infrastructure. However, communities hold contextual intelligence. They understand local pressures, cultural beliefs, social networks, and behavioural patterns that directly influence health outcomes. When government systems and community structures work in isolation, interventions risk being poorly utilised. When they work together, services become trusted, accessible, and effective.

Community specific health services do not replace the national health system. Rather, they strengthen it by embedding services within existing social structures. A practical example of this approach can be seen through the Greendale Community Anti-Drug Taskforce (GCAT). GCAT operates as a community driven platform that works collaboratively with health professionals, local leadership, families, and wider stakeholders to address drug and substance misuse at grassroots level. Its work demonstrates how community mobilisation, when aligned with public health principles and government priorities, can lead to early identification, prevention, referral, and sustained support.

What makes models such as GCAT effective is their ability to bridge formal health systems and everyday community life. They translate policy into practice by engaging youth, parents, schools, faith based groups, and local businesses, while maintaining alignment with broader public health goals. This type of partnership increases service uptake because communities are not passive recipients, but active participants in protecting their own health.

An important observation is that many health challenges are interlinked. Substance misuse often intersects with unemployment, mental health difficulties, family breakdown, and social exclusion. Government programmes achieve greater impact when communities are involved in identifying priorities, co designing interventions, and monitoring outcomes. GCAT illustrates how community led initiatives can complement government efforts through prevention, awareness, referral pathways, and local accountability.

Working with government does not mean unquestioning compliance. It means constructive collaboration. Communities organise themselves, propose practical solutions, contribute time and skills, and engage authorities through dialogue. In return, government creates space for community voices, supports local innovation, and integrates successful grassroots models into broader strategies.

Zimbabwe’s public health future depends on shared responsibility. When community initiatives like GCAT align with government frameworks, the result is health services that are responsive, inclusive, and sustainable. Progress will not come from blame or separation, but from cooperation rooted in trust.

The message is clear. Let communities lead where they are strongest. Let government support where it is mandated. Together, we can build community specific health services that reflect lived realities and safeguard the wellbeing of the nation.

08/12/2025

Global Shifts Encourage Renewed Diaspora Investment in Zimbabwe

International labour markets have tightened, reducing earnings mobility for Zimbabweans abroad and increasing long-term uncertainty. As policy changes in the UK and USA raise costs for migrant workers, many are reassessing the sustainability of living abroad.

Zimbabwe’s NDS1 prioritises modernising health services, expanding domestic investment and strengthening national development systems. Early focus areas for NDS2 highlight innovation, skills return and structured diaspora engagement. These shifts have created favourable conditions for renewed diaspora-led investment.

The writer is developing a Diaspora Health Investment and Development blueprint intended to simplify participation in Zimbabwe’s health sector. The model supports both skilled professionals and non-experts through clear investment pathways, partnership options and skills exchange mechanisms. This aligns with national efforts to build a resilient and innovation-driven health system.

As global economic conditions tighten, structured home-based investment is emerging as both a rational and a strategic choice for the diaspora.

About the Writer
A public health expert, educationalist and health systems specialist focused on sustainable health innovation and diaspora engagement.

22/11/2025

Drugs and Substance Abuse: A Regional Menace Deepening the Burden of Long-Term Illnesses

By Lloyd Gideon Makonese - A Public Health and HIV Treatment Specialist for SubSahara Africa.

The rise of drug and substance abuse across the Southern African region presents a disturbing picture that is increasingly intertwined with the lived reality of those managing long-term medical conditions. What emerges is not merely a public health concern but a widening social fissure that threatens to erode already fragile systems of care. A key question raised in the previous article still hangs in the air: how far can the region stretch before the compounded pressures of chronic illness and escalating substance misuse converge into a crisis too deep to reverse?

Across urban neighbourhoods, peri-urban settlements and remote rural communities, reports of rampant misuse of crystal methamphetamine, codeine-based cough syrups, illicit spirits and improvised psychoactive substances continue to grow. Yet one wonders how these patterns are reshaping the health journeys of individuals already living with HIV, diabetes, hypertension, epilepsy and mental health disorders. What does it mean for a person managing a lifelong condition to find themselves surrounded by a wave of cheap, accessible substances that blur the line between coping and collapse? How do strained public health systems absorb the dual burden when treatment failure, non-adherence and drug-resistant illnesses begin to rise silently in the shadows?

An essential insight emerges when considering the intersections that have long been overlooked. Why are individuals with chronic conditions increasingly vulnerable to substance misuse? Is it because the pain is unbearable, or because the health system offers limited psychosocial support? Could the expanding drug markets be preying deliberately on those already carrying visible and invisible scars? And as the region pushes towards ambitious health targets such as 95-95-95, what does the growing dependency culture signal for future progress?

The questions multiply further when one interrogates the regional landscape. Are cross-border patterns of trafficking shaping new pockets of addiction that local authorities cannot contain? Is the region witnessing the early stages of a continental mental health catastrophe concealed beneath the statistics of chronic disease? What role do economic stagnation, youth redundancy and widening inequalities play in intensifying these trajectories? Can health ministries continue to separate substance misuse from non-communicable and communicable diseases when the realities on the ground show a far deeper entanglement?

Communities, too, stand at a crossroads. How are families coping when a member living with a long-term condition drifts into substance dependency? Do support networks exist, or are households silently absorbing the social and emotional fallout? What happens to caregiving responsibilities when the caregiver is the one struggling? Could this be quietly altering family dynamics in ways that health data cannot capture?

Equally troubling are the structural silences. Why has regional cooperation on drug control remained limited to sporadic statements and fragmented enforcement strategies? Does the absence of a unified regional framework reveal a deeper reluctance to confront the scale of the menace? And how long can leaders defer meaningful engagement without risking irreversible harm to the most vulnerable among us?

As the region edges toward an uncertain future, the questions grow louder and more uncomfortable. What will happen if drug dependency among people with chronic conditions becomes the new normal? How will health systems sustain the spiralling cost of care? What is the moral responsibility of societies witnessing the slow erosion of human potential in full daylight? And perhaps the most pressing question of all: if the region continues to rely on reactionary firefighting, rather than proactive and pragmatic pathways, what future are we constructing for the next generation?

This article does not attempt to answer these questions; instead, it holds them up to the light. The path forward demands a deeper, more candid regional conversation. In the next instalment, we will turn to the approaches that may begin to respond to this intensifying challenge.

22/11/2025

HIV and AIDS in SADC: A Deadly Common Disease with a Common Regional Solution

By Lloyd Gideon Makonese - Public Health & HIV/AIDs Specialist

As the Southern African Development Community prepares for its forthcoming regional health dialogues, an uneasy question pulses beneath every agenda item. Can the region defend the hard-won gains toward 95–95–95 when external political currents threaten to erode the financial lifelines that have sustained treatment, prevention and community based care for nearly two decades? Or is SADC heading into an era where global decisions made thousands of kilometres away could quietly unravel local progress?

Across the region, more than twenty million people are living with HIV, a figure that represents just over half of the global burden. When combined with East and Southern Africa, SADC countries account for one of the highest concentrations of HIV in the world, carrying a disproportionate share of the pandemic’s weight. This raises a difficult and unavoidable question. How can low and middle income countries that already face fragile economies, chronic underfunding and pressure on health systems continue to carry a crisis of this scale without consistent international support? Global organisations that were established to protect poorer nations from infectious diseases, including HIV, remain essential to sustaining treatment access, strengthening laboratory capacity and supporting frontline workers. Without these partnerships, how many gains would begin to slide backwards, and how quickly would long standing inequalities widen?

With SDG 3 calling for universal access to healthcare and SDG 5 emphasising gender equality, it becomes important to ask how regional commitments will hold when the geopolitical landscape is shifting. What happens when donor behaviour becomes as unpredictable as the disease itself?

The decision by current United States President Donald Trump to scale back, and in some cases withdraw, funding from global HIV programmes continues to cast a long shadow over many SADC health ministries. For years, PEPFAR served as more than a financial mechanism. It functioned as the backbone of national HIV responses, providing antiretroviral medicines, laboratory systems, salaries for community health workers and prevention campaigns. What does it mean for SADC when a structure this critical becomes uncertain under the foreign policy choices of a sitting American president? How many clinics begin to feel the strain of reduced resources? How many community programmes quietly disappear from villages and settlements? And how many individuals, particularly young women and adolescents, fall out of care simply because the outreach teams that once supported them can no longer operate?

These concerns extend beyond financial implications. They expose a deeper vulnerability embedded in reliance on external support. Should SADC continue leaning heavily on foreign financing when global political actions can destabilise years of progress in a single policy shift? And if domestic funding is the future, what reforms, taxation strategies or innovative approaches are governments prepared to consider to protect millions who depend on lifelong treatment?

Migration adds another layer of complexity. SADC is a region defined by movement involving cross-border traders, truck drivers, mineworkers and seasonal labourers. What happens to treatment continuity when someone begins ART in Mozambique, relocates to South Africa for work and then returns home during economic hardship? Are national health systems ready for harmonised regional digital records that allow seamless continuity of care? Without such systems, how many patients silently slip through the cracks?

Digital misinformation is another emerging threat. Online rumours and conspiracy theories about HIV treatment often spread faster than carefully developed public health messages. How can governments shield communities from harmful content without violating freedoms of expression? And can public trust be restored when economic frustrations make communities more receptive to sensational misinformation?

Persistent stigma continues to weaken prevention and treatment efforts. Why do adolescents still fear entering testing centres? Why do men see illness as a sign of weakness? Why do some religious and cultural spaces remain reluctant to open meaningful conversations about HIV? These realities influence every step toward achieving the 95–95–95 targets.

Yet, despite the challenges, the horizon is not without hope. Community led testing, integration of HIV services with mental health and non communicable disease care, partnerships with traditional leaders and the use of digital innovations present new opportunities. But a fundamental question remains. Will SADC sustain these innovations as external funding becomes increasingly unpredictable? And will countries embrace this moment to build health systems that are truly resilient and self reliant?

The next phase of the regional HIV response will not be shaped solely by biomedical achievements. It will depend on political courage, regional cooperation and a willingness to confront difficult questions without hesitation. What happens if donor withdrawal becomes a recurring pattern? What safeguards must SADC establish now? And how can the region develop a common solution for a disease that continues to traverse borders freely?

In the months ahead, readers will need to remain alert. The choices made by SADC leaders will determine whether the region advances toward the SDGs with confidence or hesitates at a point of uncertainty. What kind of future will the region choose? The world is watching, and so are the millions whose lives depend on those decisions.

18/11/2025

HIV in SADC: A Regional Crisis That Demands a Regional Solution

By Lloyd Gideon Makonese - Public Health & HIV Specialist

Southern Africa continues to carry the highest concentration of HIV globally, with SADC countries holding just over half of the world’s total cases. This reality forces an urgent question. How will the region sustain progress toward the 95–95–95 targets at a time when major international funding streams are becoming uncertain?

Recent shifts in global politics, including funding reductions under the current US administration, have placed additional pressure on national HIV programmes that rely heavily on external support. What happens when treatment continuity depends on decisions taken far beyond the continent? How many clinics will struggle? And how many people may silently fall out of care when outreach services lose the resources they once depended on?

At Laudzer LifeSciences, we believe these questions deserve open conversation. Migration, digital misinformation, stigma and economic strain continue to shape the HIV landscape across SADC. Yet the region also has the power to build resilient, science-driven solutions that are rooted in local context and community strength.

This is the moment for governments, researchers, community leaders and health innovators to ask bold questions and craft shared solutions. The fight against HIV in Southern Africa is not only a medical challenge. It is a test of regional unity, political courage and long-term planning.

What kind of future will SADC choose?
The region’s response today will define the health and wellbeing of generations to come.

Laudzer LifeSciences remains committed to promoting evidence-based research, strengthening community health systems and supporting sustainable African-led health solutions.

30/10/2025

If you want to know more about Laudzer LifeSciences

Laudzer

30/10/2025

Understanding & Living With Menopause.

Women’s Health Live Community Session
Understanding Menopause
Let’s talk, learn and support each other.

Sunday 2 November | 18:00 UK
Laudzer LifeSciences • Facebook Live

Host: Lloyd Makonese
Public Health Specialist | University Senior Lecturer &
Founder of Laudzer LifeSciences

This session aims to raise awareness and support women and families through the physical and emotional changes of menopause, promoting understanding, compassion, and connection.

Community-focused. Family-supportive. Awareness-building.

Your voice, your story and your experience matter.
Let us learn, support and grow together. You can ask questions in the chat section during the presentation or text on WhatsApp +263775647647. You’ll be answered instantly

25/10/2025

My Aim Is to Finish the Race

Key Texts:
• 2 Timothy 4:7–8
• Hebrews 12:1–2
• Philippians 3:13–14

1. INTRODUCTION – A LIFE THAT RUNS WITH PURPOSE (1 minute)

Life is not a straight road but a race of endurance. Every believer, once called by Christ, steps onto the track of faith. The Apostle Paul, nearing the end of his journey, looked back not with regret but with victory:

“I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith” (2 Timothy 4:7).

Key Message:
Paul’s testimony teaches us that the true goal of the Christian life is not just to start strong but to finish faithfully.

Illustration idea: Imagine an athlete who stumbles but refuses to quit—the crowd remembers not the fall, but the courage to rise again.

2. THE CALL TO RUN (1 minute)

When we accept Jesus, we begin our personal race. The start may be exciting, but endurance is what defines victory. Every believer’s race is different:
• Some run through valleys of loss.
• Others climb hills of temptation or doubt.
• But God’s grace gives each runner enough strength for the distance.

Philippians 3:13–14:

“Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, I press on toward the goal.”

Reflection: Are you still running your race, or have distractions caused you to slow down?

3. THE CHALLENGE – RUNNING THROUGH THE STRUGGLE (2 minutes)

No race is without obstacles. Fatigue, discouragement, and even failure can tempt us to stop. But faith calls us to persevere.

Hebrews 12:1 reminds us to “run with perseverance the race marked out for us.”
This means letting go of everything that weighs us down—resentment, guilt, fear, or sin.

Ellen G. White, in The Acts of the Apostles (p. 560), writes:

“The true witness for Christ is the one who continues to serve Him under discouragement and trial.”

Application:
• When the journey becomes hard, don’t focus on the pain; focus on the purpose.
• When you stumble, rise again—grace is your second wind.

4. THE FOCUS – KEEPING OUR EYES ON JESUS (2 minutes)

The only way to finish the race is to stay focused on the goal.
Hebrews 12:2 says:

“Fixing our eyes on Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith.”

Jesus is not just the destination—He runs beside us, strengthens us, and lifts us when we fall.
Paul’s focus was not on human applause but on Christ’s approval.

Practical point:
Each morning, renew your focus by prayer and Scripture. Every step toward Christ is a step closer to the finish line.

5. THE FINISH LINE – THE CROWN OF VICTORY (1 minute)

At the end of life’s race, Paul could declare,

“Now there is in store for me the crown of righteousness” (2 Timothy 4:8).

This crown is not given to the fastest or strongest, but to the faithful.
Ellen G. White, The Desire of Ages (p. 679):

“The victory is not won until the race is finished… but the assurance of victory is ours through faith.”

Encouragement:
Your race may be long and filled with hardship, but God has already marked your finish line. What matters most is not speed, but faithfulness.

6. CONCLUSION – RUN WITH ENDURANCE (30 seconds)

When the road grows hard and your spirit feels weak, remember Paul’s words:

“I have kept the faith.”

Finish your race with hope, knowing that Christ waits at the end—not just as Judge, but as Redeemer and Friend.

Closing Prayer

“Lord, strengthen me to run with endurance. When I grow weary, remind me of the crown that awaits those who finish faithfully. May my life testify that I ran my race, kept the faith, and never let go of Your hand. Amen.”

21/10/2025

When the glorified health service let down the people they are meant to serve!!!