Celluloid Ceiling

Celluloid Ceiling We're committed to raising the profile of women directors around the world both now and historically. Activism for women in media

Several books published about film directors, filmmakers and film stars - all from a different perspective.

Last week to enter your novel! https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1D6wQzwsiB/?mibextid=wwXIfr
18/12/2025

Last week to enter your novel!
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1D6wQzwsiB/?mibextid=wwXIfr

This writing competition has uncovered new talent and helped to establish the careers of emerging writers by publishing and promoting their work. Previous prize winning novels have been adapted for radio and TV.

The competition is open to women and non-binary writers of any nationality from any country, aged 18 and over.

The competition is now open for your entries and closes on December 31st 2025.

Link to apply can be found below.
https://buff.ly/wiPOLZP

For more Austen food for thought delve into‘Encounters with Jane Austen’ Aurora Metro Books
17/12/2025

For more Austen food for thought delve into‘Encounters with Jane Austen’ Aurora Metro Books

Happy 250th birthday to Jane Austen, one of the most beloved authors of all time! Tell us about your favorite Jane Austen novel or favorite film adaptation below.

Born in 1775, Jane Austen is internationally recognized as one of the greatest authors of the nineteenth century, and, indeed, of all time. Much of the focus in Austen’s six novels is on her female protagonists’ search for love and, ultimately, marriage. However, in focusing on romance and marriage, she drew attention to the gender inequalities of the day. Austen, herself, was victim to these inequalities, struggling to have her books published and being forced -- along with her widowed mother and unmarried sister -- to move from place to place because they had to depend on financial support from several of Austen’s brothers.

Jane Austen lived to see the successful publication of four of her novels after years of attempted publications: Sense and Sensibility in 1811, Pride and Prejudice in 1813, Mansfield Park in 1814, and Emma in 1816. She passed away in 1817 at only 41 years of age. Both Northanger Abbey and Persuasion were published posthumously in 1818. Her remarkable way with words, her humorous approach to otherwise typical situations, and her insight into the minds of her characters continues to set her apart as one of the most widely read authors of English literature.

To introduce children to this extraordinary author, we highly recommend the picture book "A Most Clever Girl: How Jane Austen Discovered Her Voice" for ages 5 to 9 (https://www.amightygirl.com/a-most-clever-girl) and the illustrated biography "Who Was Jane Austen?" for ages 9 to 12 (https://www.amightygirl.com/who-was-jane-austen)

There is also a fascinating children's biography about Jane Austen with 21 related activities for ages 9 and up at https://www.amightygirl.com/jane-austen-for-kids

For Austen fans of all ages, there is a gorgeous hardcover box set of her complete seven works at https://www.amightygirl.com/complete-jane-austen

For adult readers, we recommend "Jane Austen At Home: A Biography" at https://www.amightygirl.com/jane-austen-at-home

Fans of all things Austen will also appreciate this t-shirt featuring vintage Pride and Prejudice artwork (https://www.amightygirl.com/pride-prejudice-cover-art-shirt) and the Jane Austen Socks (https://www.amightygirl.com/jane-austen-crew-socks)

There is also a lovely Jane Austen themed puzzle for teens and adults: "The World of Jane Austen 1000-Piece Puzzle" at https://www.amightygirl.com/world-of-jane-austen-puzzle

17/12/2025

❤️
Apply to be a WIF Fellow (applications close on January 7) or consider making a gift to WIF to support our programs and filmmakers like Neda. Links in bio ✨

17/12/2025

🎬✨ Day 17

In 2025, the debate around AI and copyright intensified, and we campaigned for this emerging technology to be regulated in a way that protects creators’ rights and livelihoods.

Read more about our work campaigning on AI in 2025 below.

Read More: https://ow.ly/Bug750XFuoE

Read more about Lottie and other sports pioneers in our book ‘50 Women in Sport’ Aurora Metro Books
17/12/2025

Read more about Lottie and other sports pioneers in our book ‘50 Women in Sport’ Aurora Metro Books

Lottie Dod was 15 years old when she stepped onto the grass courts of Wimbledon in 1887.
She was competing against women twice her age. Women with years of experience. Women who expected to win. But Lottie didn't care about expectations. She had come to play tennis her way, and her way was nothing like what Victorian England had ever seen.
Women's tennis in the 1880s was supposed to be delicate. Gentle. Players wore long, heavy skirts that dragged across the ground. They moved slowly, gracefully, as if the court were a ballroom. Aggression was considered unladylike. Power was frowned upon. The game was meant to be pretty, not competitive.
Lottie ignored all of that.
She wore shorter skirts so she could move faster. She hit the ball harder than anyone expected a woman to hit it. She didn't wait for the ball to come to her—she charged the net, played aggressively, and dominated her opponents with speed and strategy. She treated tennis like a sport, not a social event.
And she won.
At 15 years and 285 days old, Lottie Dod became the youngest Wimbledon singles champion in history. That record has stood for 137 years. No one—male or female—has ever won Wimbledon younger. And given modern age restrictions and the professionalization of tennis, no one likely ever will.
But Lottie wasn't finished.
She won Wimbledon again in 1888. And again in 1891. And again in 1892. And again in 1893. Five Wimbledon titles in total. By the time she retired from competitive tennis at age 21, she had completely dominated the sport. She was unbeatable.
And then she walked away.
Not because she was injured. Not because she had lost her edge. She simply decided she was done with tennis and wanted to try something else.
So she took up golf.
Most people who try a new sport in their late twenties are hobbyists. Lottie Dod became a champion. In 1904, she entered the British Ladies' Amateur Golf Championship—the most prestigious women's golf tournament in the world—and won it. On her first attempt. Against women who had been playing golf for decades.
She had been a serious golfer for only a few years.
But Lottie still wasn't done exploring.
She took up archery. In 1908, at the London Olympics, she competed in the women's archery competition and earned a silver medal. She had just added "Olympic medalist" to her list of accomplishments, in a completely different sport from the one that made her famous.
She also played field hockey for the England women's national team, contributing to the early development of the sport. She excelled at ice skating. She climbed mountains in the Swiss Alps. She was a competitive tobogganer.
Lottie Dod didn't just succeed in multiple sports. She reached elite levels in five different disciplines: tennis, golf, archery, field hockey, and mountaineering. Few athletes in history—male or female—have ever matched that kind of versatility.
And she did all of this in Victorian England, when women were expected to be decorative, not athletic. When playing sports "too seriously" was considered unfeminine. When women's clothing was deliberately designed to restrict movement.
Lottie ignored the restrictions. She wore what allowed her to move. She played how she wanted to play. She pursued every sport that interested her. And she proved that women could be powerful, competitive, and dominant athletes.
When World War I began, Lottie didn't retreat from public life. She served as a nurse with the Red Cross and Voluntary Aid Detachment, working in military hospitals and caring for wounded soldiers. Her dedication to service matched her dedication to sport.
She lived to age 88, passing away in 1960. By then, the world of women's sports had transformed. Women competed professionally. They earned recognition. They were celebrated for their athleticism. And much of that progress began with pioneers like Lottie Dod, who refused to accept that women should be limited.
In 1983, decades after her death, Lottie Dod was inducted into the International Tennis Hall of Fame. Her name is remembered by tennis historians. But most of the world has never heard of her.
She was 15 when she became Wimbledon champion—a record that will likely stand forever. She won five Wimbledon titles before retiring at 21. She became a national golf champion. She earned an Olympic medal in archery. She played for her country's national field hockey team. She climbed mountains and broke barriers in every direction she turned.
Lottie Dod proved that greatness doesn't fit into one category. That talent isn't limited by age or gender or societal expectations. That someone can be the best in the world at one thing, walk away from it, and then become the best at something completely different.
She didn't just break records. She broke the idea that women had limits.
When someone is told they can't, and they respond by becoming the best at five different things, what does that say about the limits we accept?

17/12/2025

England, 1196. When the Earl of Salisbury died, his nine-year-old daughter Ela became one of the wealthiest heiresses in the kingdom.
In medieval England, that didn't make her powerful. It made her a target.
What happened next is shrouded in legend. According to medieval chronicles, young Ela was taken to Normandy and hidden away—some say by relatives who wanted to control her vast inheritance. The details are murky. Some historians suggest it may have been her mother's family protecting her; others say it was darker than that.
What the legends agree on is the rescue.
An English knight named William Talbot reportedly traveled to Normandy in search of her. According to the tale, he disguised himself as a pilgrim and wandered from castle to castle for two years. At each fortress, he would sing beneath the high windows, hoping the young countess would hear him and respond.
Whether it happened exactly this way, we'll never know. But the story has persisted for eight centuries.
What we know for certain is this: Ela's wardship passed to King Richard I, who saw her as an opportunity to reward his loyal half-brother, William Longespée—"Long Sword"—by offering him her hand in marriage.
It sounds like another medieval transaction: the rescued heiress married off to serve political ends.
But something unexpected happened.
By all accounts, Ela and William built a genuine partnership. Together, they laid foundation stones for Salisbury Cathedral in 1220. They had at least eight children. For thirty years, they navigated the treacherous politics of medieval England together, surviving the reigns of Richard I, King John, and the minority of Henry III.
Then in 1226, after returning from a shipwreck off the coast of Brittany, William died at Salisbury Castle. Some whispered of poison—a rat found in his skull centuries later carried traces of arsenic, though historians debate whether this proves anything.
What happened next showed who Ela truly was.
In 1225, while William was merely presumed dead, Hubert de Burgh had already tried to arrange Ela's marriage to his nephew Reimund. Ela refused, insisting she knew her husband was alive—and even if he weren't, she would never marry beneath her station.
She reportedly invoked the eighth clause of Magna Carta: "No widow shall be compelled to marry, so long as she wishes to remain without a husband."
After William's actual death, Ela refused every proposal. She would not hand her power to another man.
Instead, she did something almost unheard of.
She became High Sheriff of Wiltshire.
Let that sink in. In 13th-century England, Ela collected taxes, administered justice, commanded the county, and answered directly to the king. She held the office twice—from 1227-1228 and again from 1231-1237. She was one of only two women in all of medieval England to hold such a position.
She didn't just hold a title. She governed. She appeared at the Exchequer in person to render accounts. She wielded real power in a world that believed women incapable of it.
But even that wasn't the end of Ela's story.
In 1229, she began founding Lacock Abbey in Wiltshire—not as a distant patron, but as someone who would eventually live there herself. The foundation stone was laid on April 16, 1232. In 1238, she entered the abbey as a nun, bringing with her a copy of the 1225 Magna Carta that her late husband had witnessed.
Two years later, she was elected Abbess.
As Abbess, she secured charters and rights for her community, negotiated privileges with the crown, and led Lacock for seventeen years before stepping down due to ill health. Even then, she remained at the abbey until her death in 1261, at approximately 74 years old.
Her tombstone still bears these words: "Below lie buried the bones of the venerable Ela, who gave this sacred house as a home for the nuns. She also had lived here as holy abbess and Countess of Salisbury, full of good works."
Historians have called Ela "one of the two towering female figures of the mid-13th century."
Think about the journey. Hidden away as a child. Married into royalty. Widowed and pressured to surrender her power. Instead, she became sheriff. Then founder. Then abbess. A leader at every stage.
Lacock Abbey still stands today, more than 800 years later.
The kidnapping story may be legend. The singing knight may be romantic embellishment. But the facts of Ela's life need no embellishment.
A nine-year-old girl inherited an earldom in a world that gave women almost no power. Through every challenge—loss, pressure, expectation—she found ways to lead.
That's not legend.
That's history.

~Old Photo Club

17/12/2025

…versus an average $117M in revenue for projects that hired mostly men. Through our ReFrame program—co-founded with the Sundance Institute—WIF produces industry research that makes the financial argument undeniable: gender-balanced narrative features earn more than twice as much as others. ReFrame leverages this data through targeted advocacy—from Awards Season voter guides spotlighting women artists to media amplification, including a recent headline from The Hollywood Reporter: “If You Want a Gender-Balanced Staff, Hire a Woman as Showrunner.”

Together, these efforts translate research into actionable, industry-wide change. Consider making a year-end gift today at https://womeninfilm.app.neoncrm.com/campaigns/general-fund-2025?mc_cid=ef905bbe29&mc_eid=UNIQID

Must be time for a biopic on Gina LB?https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19ojoUg25s/?mibextid=wwXIfr
12/12/2025

Must be time for a biopic on Gina LB?

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19ojoUg25s/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Howard Hughes trapped her with a contract meant to destroy her career. She found the loopholes, built an empire in Europe, and walked away on her own terms.
In 1950, Howard Hughes—one of Hollywood's most powerful and notorious producers—saw a photograph of Italian actress Gina Lollobrigida and decided he had to have her.
At 44 years old, Hughes controlled RKO Pictures and had a well-documented pattern: sign beautiful women to restrictive contracts, pursue them romantically, and if they refused his advances, effectively end their careers through legal manipulation.
He invited Gina to Hollywood for a screen test, promising to send tickets for both her and her husband, Milko Škofič, a Yugoslavian physician she'd married in 1949.
Only one ticket arrived.
Gina came to Hollywood alone. And for three months, Hughes pursued her relentlessly.
English lessons. Luxury parties. Expensive gifts. Introductions to powerful people. The full force of Hollywood seduction aimed at a 23-year-old woman from a small Italian town who barely spoke English.
Then Hughes made his ultimate offer: he'd divorce his wife, marry Gina, and give her millions, furs, jewels, and stardom beyond imagination—if she'd just divorce her husband first.
Gina refused. "I was married," she said later, "and for me the marriage was one for life."
Most women would have left Hollywood at that point, understanding that rejecting Howard Hughes meant rejecting Hollywood itself. But Hughes wasn't finished.
At a farewell party thrown in Gina's honor, Hughes orchestrated his final move. Champagne flowed freely. The party stretched into early morning hours. And when Gina was exhausted, her English still limited, Hughes presented her with documents he claimed were innocent formalities—departure paperwork, perhaps a simple release.
She signed.
It was a seven-year contract that effectively banned her from working in Hollywood unless she worked exclusively for Hughes. Any other studio wanting to hire her would face lawsuits and unreasonable licensing fees. The contract gave Hughes complete control over her American film career.
It was a trap designed to force her into submission: work for me on my terms, or don't work in Hollywood at all.
"I couldn't return to Hollywood without Howard Hughes filing a lawsuit," Gina recalled decades later. "He said I was his property."
Most actresses of that era would have been destroyed by such a contract. The powerful men of Hollywood expected submission. They expected women to break, to compromise, to accept their powerlessness in exchange for a chance at stardom.
But Gina Lollobrigida was nobody's property.
She did something Hughes never anticipated: she studied the contract and found the loopholes.
The contract prevented her from working in American films shot in the United States—but it said nothing about American films shot in Europe. Nothing about working for European studios. Nothing about building an international career beyond Hughes's reach.
So that's exactly what she did.
In 1953, she starred in "Beat the Devil" alongside Humphrey Bogart—an American production, but filmed in Italy, outside Hughes's jurisdiction.
That same year, she became an international sensation in the Italian film "Bread, Love and Dreams," earning a BAFTA nomination for Best Foreign Actress.
In 1956, she commanded the screen in "Trapeze" with Burt Lancaster and Tony Curtis—shot in Paris, beyond Hughes's control.
While Hughes tried to trap her in Los Angeles, Gina built an empire across Europe on her own terms.
She designed her own costumes. She did her own makeup. She negotiated her own contracts with European studios, sometimes pricing herself out of roles rather than accepting less than she deserved.
"I am an expert on Gina," she declared—a statement of autonomy in an industry designed to make women dependent on men's approval.
By 1959, Gina Lollobrigida was such a massive international star that when MGM desperately wanted her for "Never So Few" opposite Frank Sinatra—to be shot in the United States—they were forced to pay Hughes $75,000 just to placate him, on top of her substantial salary.
Hughes had tried to own her. Instead, she'd made herself so valuable that studios paid him ransoms just for the privilege of her presence.
She had won.
Even after Hughes sold RKO Pictures in 1955, he kept her contract—not for business reasons, but for control, for spite, for the satisfaction of knowing he still technically owned a piece of her career.
But by then, it didn't matter. She'd already conquered international cinema without surrendering anything.
Three David di Donatello Awards (Italy's highest film honor). A Golden Globe. International stardom across Europe and beyond. She acted fluently in Italian, French, and English, commanding her own image in an era when women were told to be grateful for whatever scraps powerful men offered.
And then—at the height of her fame—she did something even more revolutionary.
She walked away.
By the late 1960s and early 1970s, Gina Lollobrigida began pursuing a second career as a photojournalist.
The woman Hollywood tried to reduce to property was now photographing world leaders, artists, and icons on her own terms: Paul Newman, Salvador Dalí, Henry Kissinger, Audrey Hepburn, Ella Fitzgerald.
In 1974, she achieved what many professional journalists couldn't—exclusive access to Fidel Castro for an in-depth interview and documentary. The actress who'd been trapped by America's most powerful producer was now interviewing one of the world's most powerful political leaders.
She became an accomplished sculptor, her work exhibited internationally. France awarded her the Légion d'honneur—one of the nation's highest honors—for her artistic achievements beyond film.
In 2013, at age 86, she sold her extensive jewelry collection at auction and donated nearly $5 million to stem-cell research.
Gina Lollobrigida died on January 16, 2023, at age 95—one of the last surviving stars of Hollywood's Golden Age, having outlived Howard Hughes by nearly 47 years.
She never needed Hughes's millions or Hollywood's approval. She never compromised her marriage, her dignity, or her autonomy for fame.
She built something far more valuable than stardom: a life lived entirely on her own terms.
Her story remains a masterclass in power and resistance:
When they try to own you, find the loopholes.
When they block your path, create new roads in places they don't control.
When you've conquered their world, have the courage to walk away and build something better.
Howard Hughes thought he could control Gina Lollobrigida with a seven-year contract designed to break her will.
Instead, she showed the world that the most powerful act of defiance isn't breaking the chains—it's proving you were never truly bound in the first place.
She outsmarted him, outworked him, outlasted him, and outlived him.
And she did it all while staying married to the man she chose, refusing every bribe and threat, building multiple careers, and giving away millions to causes she believed in.
That's not just survival. That's triumph.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1MGVLfs1dt/?mibextid=wwXIfr
07/12/2025

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1MGVLfs1dt/?mibextid=wwXIfr

No one in New York ever forgot that afternoon in 1869. A woman ran across Fifth Avenue, her skirt gathered up and a leather bag pressed tightly against her chest. Her name was Marie Zakrzewska, she was 43 years old, and as the crowd stepped aside to let her pass, everyone thought the same thing: “What can a woman do here?”

On the ground, a man lay motionless. A carriage had run him over. People stared. Commented. Pointed. But no one knew what to do. Until Marie knelt down.

“Step aside,” she ordered, without raising her voice. “Madam, are you crazy?” said a policeman. “You have no reason to intervene.” “If I don’t intervene, he dies,” she replied, without blinking.

While others hesitated, Marie acted. She took his pulse. Opened his shirt. Checked his breathing. Gave clear instructions: “I need an empty carriage. And a blanket.”

Several people ran to fetch what she asked for. Marie placed the man with great care. “Don’t move him like that,” she said, holding the injured man’s neck. “We could damage his spine.”

The policeman looked at her, confused. “Who are you?” Marie raised her eyes. “The woman doing what you should be doing.”

That episode did not leave her at peace. That night, as she wrote in her small office, she could not erase the image of the man collapsed in the middle of the street. “What barbarity,” she thought. “A city with thousands of inhabitants… and no one knows how to help.”

Marie was not an ordinary woman. She was a doctor. German. And a pioneer who had already fought a thousand battles to be taken seriously. She knew that in New York most accidents ended in tragedy because no one arrived in time… or they arrived, but without knowledge. “Something must be done.”

And that idea would not let her go.

Two weeks later, she gathered two doctors and a nurse in a small hall on the East Side. “We need a rapid response corps,” she explained. “Trained people. Adapted vehicles. Basic supplies. Something that can reach any point in the city within minutes.”

The doctors looked at each other. “A kind of… mobile medical brigade?” “Exactly.”

There were doubts, criticisms, laughter. “Marie, that would be impossible to finance.” “Marie, the city would never authorize something like that.” “Marie, no one will trust a system invented by a woman.”

She placed both hands on the table. “Then if the city doesn’t authorize it, we’ll start it ourselves. Whoever joins will work for free until we prove it works.”

Silence. And one by one… the three said: “I’m in.”

The first “emergency vehicle” was nothing more than a reinforced carriage, with a rudimentary stretcher and a wooden box full of bandages, alcohol, and a few surgical forceps.

Marie and her team trained for days on end: how to carry an injured person, how to stop bleeding, how to immobilize fractures, how to act in panic.

But the hardest part was not the training. It was the reaction of the people. “Hey, there go the doctor’s lunatics!” some shouted. “What is that? A circus?” others mocked.

Marie did not respond. She waited for the facts.

And the facts came.

The first call came on a Saturday. A child had fallen from the second floor of a house. People screamed in the street.

Marie’s carriage arrived within minutes. “Step aside!” she shouted as she jumped from the vehicle. “Let me see him!”

While the mother sobbed, Marie examined the boy. “He’s breathing. He has a pulse. We can save him.”

She immobilized him with boards, gave quick instructions, and they took him to the hospital. He survived.

That day, the entire city changed its mind.

What began as a “crazy idea with no future” became the first modern urban ambulance service. New York adopted the system. Then Boston. Then the rest of the country.

Marie never sought recognition. She only wanted no one to die out of ignorance.

Later, when asked why she insisted so much, she replied: “Because I cannot bear to see people die surrounded by spectators. We can all save a life… if someone dares to begin.”

30/11/2025

She was born into a world that said writing was "improper" for women like her. She wrote anyway—novels that destroyed their illusions—and became the first woman to win a Pulitzer Prize for Fiction.

In 1862, Edith Newbold Jones was born into New York aristocracy with a silver spoon and an invisible gag.
Her family were the Joneses—yes, those Joneses. The phrase "keeping up with the Joneses" allegedly refers to her father's family. They made their fortune in real estate. They knew everyone who mattered. Her father's first cousin was Caroline Schermerhorn Astor, who literally decided who belonged to New York's "Four Hundred"—the city's social elite.
Edith grew up in brownstones and ballrooms, educated by governesses and tutors who taught her French, German, and Italian. She spent years traveling Europe. She read voraciously from her father's library, though her mother forbade novels—too scandalous, too dangerous, too likely to give a young woman ideas.
But Edith already had ideas.
At fourteen, she finished her first novella, Fast and Loose. The heroine was a woman who married for money instead of love and regretted it. Even then, Edith was writing about the gilded cage.
By sixteen, she published a poem in The Atlantic Monthly—anonymously, because her family refused to let her name appear in print. Writing, they insisted, was not a proper occupation for a society woman.
This was the 1870s—the decade after the Civil War, when New York's old money clashed with new industrial fortunes. Edith's world was drawing rooms and dinner parties, rigid etiquette and whispered cruelty. Women were ornaments. Intelligence was suspect. Ambition was vulgar.
At eighteen, she made her society debut. At twenty-three, facing the specter of spinsterhood, she married Edward "Teddy" Wharton—a charming, wealthy, utterly unintellectual sportsman thirteen years her senior.
The marriage was a disaster from the start. Teddy had no profession, no interests beyond hunting and travel, and eventually suffered from severe depression. Edith felt like she was suffocating.
So she wrote.
At first, she published books on interior design—The Decoration of Houses in 1897, a subject considered acceptable for women. But fiction kept calling.
In 1899, she published her first short story collection. In 1902, her first novel. Critics compared her to Henry James, whom she knew and admired. Like James, she wrote about manners and morality. Unlike James, her prose was cleaner, sharper, more devastating.
Then came The House of Mirth in 1905.
The novel follows Lily Bart, a beautiful twenty-nine-year-old woman trying desperately to marry well in New York society. Lily has intelligence, taste, and ambition—but no money and no husband. She makes mistakes. She trusts the wrong people. Society turns on her with vicious speed.
The book ends with Lily's death, alone and discarded, destroyed by the very world she tried so hard to please.
The House of Mirth sold over 140,000 copies. It became a sensation. It also embarrassed Edith's social circle, who saw themselves reflected in its pages—and didn't like what they saw. Friends distanced themselves. Critics accused her of betraying her class.
She didn't care. She kept writing.
But her personal life was crumbling. Teddy's mental health deteriorated. He suffered nervous breakdowns. He became erratic, sometimes violent. For years, Edith tried to help him, tried to save the marriage, tried to maintain appearances.
In 1907, she moved to France permanently. In 1908, she began an affair with journalist Morton Fullerton—finally finding someone who matched her intellectually. In 1911, she published Ethan Frome, a brutal novella about a New England farmer trapped in a loveless marriage, his life destroyed by a failed su***de attempt.
In 1913, after twenty-eight years of marriage, Edith and Teddy divorced. She was fifty-one years old, finally free.
Then came the war.
In August 1914, Edith was in Paris when Germany declared war on France. Most Americans fled. Edith stayed.
She could have gone home to safety. Instead, she threw herself into relief work with ferocious energy.
Within months, she organized the American Hostels for Refugees—providing meals, shelter, clothing, and medical care to thousands of Belgian refugees fleeing German invasion. She opened workrooms where unemployed Frenchwomen could earn money sewing. She organized concerts to support musicians. She established the Children of Flanders Rescue Committee, sheltering nearly 900 refugee children whose homes had been bombed.
By the end of 1915, she had aided over 9,300 refugees. The next year, over 13,000.
She also used her connections—and she had extraordinary connections—to gain access few foreigners received. With her friend Walter Berry, she made five trips to the front lines between February and August 1915.
She saw devastated villages. Trenches filled with soldiers. The aftermath of artillery fire. She stood close enough to hear the guns.
She wrote about it all for Scribner's Magazine—dispatches that were later published as Fighting France: From Dunkerque to Belfort. Her goal was clear: convince neutral America to join the war effort.
But writing wasn't enough. She compiled The Book of the Homeless in 1916—a benefit anthology featuring contributions from the greatest artists and writers of the era. Pierre-Auguste Renoir donated a portrait. Igor Stravinsky contributed musical scores. Claude Monet sent a drawing. Henry James recruited Thomas Hardy, William Dean Howells, and John Singer Sargent. The book raised thousands of dollars for refugees.
On April 18, 1916, the French government awarded Edith Wharton the Chevalier of the Legion of Honor—France's highest honor. She was the first American woman ever to receive it.
After the war, exhausted and needing escape, she traveled to Morocco. The trip refreshed her soul—and gave birth to another book.
In 1920, Edith published The Age of Innocence.
Set in 1870s New York—the world of her childhood—the novel follows Newland Archer, a wealthy lawyer engaged to the perfect society bride, May Welland. Then Newland meets Ellen Olenska, May's cousin, who has fled her disastrous European marriage and returned to New York seeking freedom.
Newland and Ellen fall in love. But neither can break free from convention. Society's invisible rules prove stronger than desire. Newland marries May. Ellen returns to Europe. They sacrifice their happiness to maintain appearances.
The novel is elegant, precise, and ruthlessly sad. It captures exactly how privilege can be a prison—how reputation replaces morality, how conformity destroys lives, how women suffer most under rules made by men.
In 1921, The Age of Innocence won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction.
Edith Wharton became the first woman ever to receive the honor.
Even then, there was controversy. The three judges actually voted to give the prize to Sinclair Lewis for Main Street. But Columbia University's conservative advisory board overruled them, choosing Wharton instead.
She spent her later years in France, living in an eighteenth-century house she called Pavillon Colombe. She entertained writers and artists—Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Gertrude Stein. She continued writing until the end, though her later works never matched the brilliance of her earlier novels.
In 1923, she became the first woman to receive an honorary doctorate from Yale University.
On August 11, 1937, Edith Wharton died of a stroke at age seventy-five. She was buried in Versailles with full military honors—"with all the honors owed a war hero and a chevalier of the Legion of Honor."
Edith Wharton once wrote: "There are two ways of spreading light: to be the candle or the mirror that reflects it."
She chose both.
She was the candle—illuminating the hypocrisies of her world, writing novels that exposed what polite society preferred to hide. She was the mirror—reflecting back to the wealthy elite their own moral emptiness, their casual cruelty, their destruction of anyone who dared to be different.
She turned drawing rooms into battlegrounds. She made manners into murder weapons. She proved that the most devastating rebellions can be written in elegant prose.
Born into wealth in 1862, Edith Wharton was expected to marry well, host dinners, and stay decoratively silent. Instead, she wrote fifteen novels, seven novellas, eighty-five short stories, poetry, design books, travel writing, and cultural criticism.
She became the first woman to win the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction and the first American woman to receive the French Legion of Honor.
She didn't ask permission. She didn't apologize. She didn't soften her truths to make anyone comfortable.
She proved that intellect and empathy could expose what society prefers to hide—and that sometimes the most radical act is simply refusing to be quiet.

Address

80 Hill Rise
London
TW106UB

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Celluloid Ceiling posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Celluloid Ceiling:

Share

Category