CapX CapX brings you the best writing on politics, economics, markets and ideas.

Labour have promised to grow the economy and make Britain more competitive. But one of the things that growth depends on...
09/10/2025

Labour have promised to grow the economy and make Britain more competitive. But one of the things that growth depends on – fast and reliable mobile signal – is being quietly undermined by a law most people have never heard of. Unless ministers act soon, the plan to bring 5G to every part of the country by 2030 will be in real trouble.

✍️Thomas Evans

London is at the bottom of the European league for 5G quality

A year into this Labour Government, the Conservatives remain trapped in an identity crisis. The polls are grim, morale i...
09/10/2025

A year into this Labour Government, the Conservatives remain trapped in an identity crisis. The polls are grim, morale is lower still and every new policy announcement has seemed to only invite the same weary question: what does the party actually stand for? In that context, Kemi Badenoch’s first ever conference speech was always going to be more than just another pitch to the faithful. It was a test of whether the Conservative Party still has a future at all.

Badenoch’s intervention was an attempt to drag the debate back to first principles: that prosperity depends on discipline, that government cannot print its way to progress and that fiscal restraint is not the enemy of compassion but its foundation.

The trouble is, Britain has heard this before...

✍️Damian Pudner

Kemi Badenoch’s new ‘golden rule’ is a test of the Right's moral courage

This year marks the 50th anniversary of Margaret Thatcher becoming leader of the Conservatives, an event that is quite r...
08/10/2025

This year marks the 50th anniversary of Margaret Thatcher becoming leader of the Conservatives, an event that is quite rightly being commemorated. But it is also 51 years since the founding of the Centre for Policy Studies – CapX’s parent organisation, and the intellectual logistics hub of the extraordinary 1980s. Indeed, the Thatcher Revolution would simply not have happened without its groundwork, and the blueprint crafted by the likes of Keith Joseph and John Hoskyns in particular.

Rather than one central blueprint for radical reform, today’s compounded and often interlinked problems will need a dozen schematics – presuming in the first instance that the right someone comes to power.

A new paper, 'The Great Reform Bill', seeks to set out where we are at and what our own modern Hoskyns approach needs to be...

✍️Lee Rotherham

Radical reformers need to know which laws to change before they win power

Many SME leaders voted Labour in July 2024. Some are now flirting with Reform UK. As Conservatives gather in Manchester ...
06/10/2025

Many SME leaders voted Labour in July 2024. Some are now flirting with Reform UK. As Conservatives gather in Manchester this week, the party has designated this day of its annual conference ‘Business Day’ – rightly shining a spotlight on our wealth creators. To mark the occasion, Conservatives For Business (CFB), a non-affiliated platform giving SMEs a stronger voice, has published new Opinium polling. It shows that putting SMEs at the heart of Conservative renewal could rebuild trust and boost growth.

While Conservatives lead Labour among larger firms (26% vs. 19%), the parties are neck and neck among SMEs. Unlike big corporations, small business owners shoulder every burden themselves. Without an HR team, legal department or finance floor, every tax hike or new regulation hits them harder – and personally. SMEs need politicians who understand and act on those realities.

✍️Danielle Dunfield-Prayero

One in four small businesses are unsure if they will survive the next year.

When the term ‘ESG’ (Environmental, Social and Governance) was coined in 2004, it was all about making capitalism more c...
02/10/2025

When the term ‘ESG’ (Environmental, Social and Governance) was coined in 2004, it was all about making capitalism more conscious and caring. Meeting at the United Nations headquarters in New York, mega financial conglomerates like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and HSBC signed the ‘Who Cares Wins’ charter to take a ‘leadership role’ in integrating kind-hearted policies into the financial markets.

From the get-go, ESG championed several pet progressive projects: stopping climate change, increasing management diversity and promoting human rights. Companies promised to integrate these campaigns into their investment decisions and research. Today, as the new report ‘Woke Capitalism’ from think tank Civitas explores, ESG has broadened to include causes such as Net Zero, DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) and anti-racism.

What no one could have predicted in 2004 is ESG’s near-universal takeover of the economy. There is hardly a major financial institution in the country without an ESG goal, agenda or rating. Thousands of British businesses are paid-up members of diversity schemes like B Corp, or Stonewall’s Proud Employers. An extraordinary $40 trillion is expected to be invested in European ESG assets by 2030, a figure roughly twice the size of the European Union’s total GDP.

The incontrovertible flaw of ESG, however, is that it is an inherently political project. It is through ESG that employers have instructed staff to introduce themselves with gender neutral language. When Nigel Farage lost his account with Coutts Bank, it was because his views did not ‘align’ with their values as ‘an inclusive organisation’. Criticising workplace diversity schemes that promote highly contested ideas like critical race theory and transgenderism could risk losing your job. ESG is, by its very nature, exclusionary, not inclusive.

✍️Daniel Dieppe

The scourge of ESG has distorted our economic system

By the 1970s, a few generations of the brightest minds in Britain had been utterly flummoxed by our national decline, an...
02/10/2025

By the 1970s, a few generations of the brightest minds in Britain had been utterly flummoxed by our national decline, and felt that managing it was the best they could do in a situation that was inevitable. It took heroic thinkers from outside the Civil Service to diagnose the problems, and come up with the solutions.

John Hoskyns’ legendary wire diagram pinpointed the power of the unions, and the resultant inflation and stasis that came from them, as the sine qua non of Britain’s woes. It took Hoskyns, his colleague Norman Strauss and Terry Price (as far as I’m aware, we bear no relation) and collaborators like Alfred Sherman to convince first Keith Joseph, and then the blessed Margaret of both this fact, and then to work out what the detailed legislative and policy solutions might be.

This effort was hampered by the intransigence of the Wets like Jim Prior and Michael ‘Judas’ Heseltine, who stymied the kind of strategic thinking necessary, and almost cost Margaret Thatcher’s revolution its success.

This time around, the challenge facing the Right is different. There is already almost unanimous agreement as to what that central issue is, by all right-thinking people, from Kemi Badenoch to Nigel Farage, from Dominic Cummings to, I hope, you, dear reader. And that is the deracination of ministerial power and true Parliamentary scrutiny to the ‘Blob’ of civil servants, quangos, regulators and executive agencies, not to mention the thicket of bad law and bad faith lawyers and judges that dominate political decision making.

I complained about the Blob in my last column, no less. As we head into the Conservative Party Conference though, all eyes ought to be on who is actually coming up with the radical, yet detailed, answers to strip the hundred handed Briareus that is the modern Civil Service of its power.

✍️James Price

There are a few intellectual heavyweights to keep an eye on at Conservative Party Conference

Calls for a ‘bonfire of the quangos’ have been made since David Cameron’s time as Leader of the Opposition all the way t...
01/10/2025

Calls for a ‘bonfire of the quangos’ have been made since David Cameron’s time as Leader of the Opposition all the way through to Keir Starmer’s premiership. Yet for all the rhetoric, the quangocracy has grown bigger, better staffed and more powerful.

With over 500,000 staff and a total expenditure greater than the GDP of Norway, the reliance on these ‘arm’s-length bodies’ by ministers, and therefore the impact on our lives, has never been greater. Since Anthony Eden took office 70 years ago, every Prime Minister who has stayed in office for a full year has created a quango. Tony Blair created 92, the most of any Prime Minister. Even David Cameron, the man who first promised the great bonfire, created 54.

Keir Starmer has continued on this train. From promising reform in opposition, the first eight months of Labour saw the creation of 27 new quangos. These range from Great British Energy, which – rather than tapping into the vast resource wealth of the North Sea, will ensure Britain continues to spend heavily on wind farms – to the Industrial Strategy Advisory Council, which will take advice from trade unions on how best to unleash growth in the economy.
..

Quangos provide a shield behind which ministers can hide. Ministers have blamed these bodies for everything from failures during Covid to the decline in school performance. Rarely do they accept a problem as their own fault. Perhaps they were unaware of what an arm’s-length body was doing on a daily basis; perhaps it was operating beyond its scope; perhaps it was even acting in ways contrary to the governing party’s manifesto pledges. Whatever the excuse, the conclusion should be the same: the quango state must be reduced by stripping these bodies of their functions and restoring control and accountability to ministers – and, through them, to voters.

✍️Callum McGoldrick

Britain’s quangos have a total expenditure greater than the GDP of Norway.

Amid the distraction of whether Nigel Farage’s latest party is racist, it’s worth casting your minds back a decade. Amid...
30/09/2025

Amid the distraction of whether Nigel Farage’s latest party is racist, it’s worth casting your minds back a decade. Amid the rancour of the EU referendum, those wanting to leave were caricatured as a mix between ‘little Englanders’, whose horizons barely stretched beyond the next green and pleasant field, and imperial nostalgists desperate to get the band back together.

It was and is a ridiculous combination. But there was a remarkable lack of warmth – less hostility, and more a dismal kind of apathy – towards people who once would have also been referred to as ‘British subjects’.

That coolness was evidenced last week, as Farage refused to confirm whether Hong Kongers would be exempt from his plans to jettison ‘indefinite leave to remain’ (ILR) status. Asked about those fleeing Beijing’s authoritarianism in the former city state, the Reform leader was unequivocal: ‘800,000 people are due to qualify for indefinite leave to remain over the course of the next few years. This press conference is to say none of them will get it.’

Roughly analogous to the permanent residency status granted elsewhere, people with ILR are free to live, study and work in the UK without time limit, while also qualifying for most benefits. As a step towards naturalisation, it’s also a key means of recruiting new British citizens from around the globe.

The attack on ILR is part of the nativist turn in British politics, explicitly positioned in response to the so-called ‘Boriswave’. Under the previous Conservative government, inward net migration soared to more than 900,000 in 2023 – figures that are justifiably seen as a betrayal of voters who wanted to ‘take back control’ of the country’s borders.

While Reform’s plan is severe, it’s not exactly unusual among the major parties.

✍️Jimmy Nicholls

Britain has a moral responsibility to help fleeing Hong Kongers

Pity the Labour MPs huddling in the bars of Liverpool during their party conference. Most of them were elected for the f...
30/09/2025

Pity the Labour MPs huddling in the bars of Liverpool during their party conference. Most of them were elected for the first time last year. They might have expected to be swaggering in the annual shindig as masters of the universe. Instead, it is more of a therapy session.

Naturally, when things are going badly for a political party meetings become blame-storming sessions with the leadership being the immediate scapegoats. Under pressure, Keir Starmer seeks to placate his critics, only adding to the incoherence. U-turns, reshuffles, phase one, phase two. Mission statements that nobody can quite remember. Emphatic pledges of confidence in ministers who are sacked the next day. A refusal to express confidence in the Chancellor who then bursts into tears and is kept in office.

Bewilderingly contradictory signals keep coming out of Downing Street. This weekend we had the Prime Minister denounce Reform UK’s of policy of abolishing indefinite leave to remain for migrants as ‘racist’. Now there can be lots of valid criticisms of the policy – that it is unfair or unworkable, that it would apply too broadly to those who have integrated and are making a positive contribution. But there is no suggestion that it would not be applied to white people. So hard to see how it is racist. Nor does it seem much harsher than the Home Secretary’s plans to make it harder for migrants to qualify for indefinite leave to remain.

On welfare spending, we have Pat McFadden, the Work and Pensions Secretary, making some robust comments. I’m assured by someone who knows him that it is not just rhetoric – he is a true believer. Yet we also have briefings that the Government intends to lift the two-child benefit cap – adding billions more to the benefits bill and trap yet more households in worklessness cascading down the generations.

Amid all the gaffes, the splits and the spin seen each morning on the front pages, it was something of a relief to read an essay in The Times by Patrick Maguire. It suggested that away from Westminster during the summer, some Labour MPs had been thinking a bit more deeply into the predicament they find themselves in.

✍️Harry Phibbs

Downing Street is churning out bewilderingly contradictory statements

Many on the Left are calling for a wholesale bailout of Jaguar Land Rover✍️Eliot Wilson
29/09/2025

Many on the Left are calling for a wholesale bailout of Jaguar Land Rover

✍️Eliot Wilson

Many on the Left are calling for a wholesale bailout of Jaguar Land Rover

This Government must prove that it has the resolve to take on the agents of our decline✍️Lawrence Newport
29/09/2025

This Government must prove that it has the resolve to take on the agents of our decline

✍️Lawrence Newport

Keir Starmer is considering withdrawing the UK from a little-known, damaging Convention

For too long, Remainiacs in academia have been allowed to hijack the debate✍️Gawain Towler
29/09/2025

For too long, Remainiacs in academia have been allowed to hijack the debate

✍️Gawain Towler

A new book dismantles the claims made by the Brexit cynics

Address

London

Telephone

+442072224488

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when CapX posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to CapX:

Share

Category