Warcry Publishing

Warcry Publishing Kindle numbers a myth? Anyone else a tad dissapointed in what their book(s) achieve? Dication, Formatting, File Conversion, Printing, Promotion etc.

I look after a few books, https://www.facebook.com/sweetagonypaulsykes/ and https://www.facebook.com/astiffsentencejohnkeenan/ etc. and would be interested in trying to push a few books if anyone's interested.

Location of the Krays Regency club in 2026
12/06/2026

Location of the Krays Regency club in 2026

...

11/06/2026
10/06/2026

On the morning of the 29th of April 1887, a routine patrol on the Badsworth Hall estate near Pontefract turned deadly when gamekeepers William Illingworth and Edward George Copley confronted two armed poachers on Badsworth Common.

A violent struggle followed, during which Copley was shot at close range and Illingworth was beaten unconscious.

Copley later died from his injuries, and the attackers— David Pilmore and Henry Roberts —fled the scene, sparking a months‑long manhunt filled with false arrests and confusion, possibly caused by the £100 reward offered at the time, a tidy sum in 1887.

Pilmore was finally captured in the December of 1887 in Reading and was later convicted of murder in the following February 1888, receiving a death sentence that was ultimately commuted to life imprisonment.

Roberts was never brought to justice and was believed to have died not long after the incident.

The case left a lasting mark on the Yorkshire community, remembered as one of the most violent poaching incidents of the era—and a reminder of the dangers faced by those who protected the land.

The memory of that tragic morning was preserved in stone. Captain R. H. Jones and Miss Jones proprietors of the Badsworth Estate erected a monument in the churchyard in honour of Edward George Copley, bearing the inscription: “To the memory of Edward George Copley, who was shot by poachers whilst gallantly doing his duty.” At its base were the words: “Father, forgive them.”

Talking to the very charismatic 'Soho George'
10/06/2026

Talking to the very charismatic 'Soho George'

...

07/06/2026

Horse Play Leads to Death

Cottam Power Station

Friday the 13th, January 1967

In January 1967, the quiet Yorkshire town of Pontefract found itself tied to a tragedy that would echo far beyond its streets. The death of 20-year-old Raymond Williams, from Baghill near Pontefract. His death not the result of long-planned violence or hardened criminality, but of something far more unsettling — a chain of events that began with workplace horseplay and ended in a fatal shooting at Cottam Power Station near Retford.

On Friday the 13th of January 1967, three young men from Pontefract — Charles Lawrence Birdsall (19), Raymond Williams (20), and Melvyn Blades (19) — were working together at the vast construction site. Birdsall, a labourer and semi-skilled engineer, had travelled there some months earlier after leaving employment with his father’s firm. He later explained that he had felt uneasy working under his father, believing others thought he was not pulling his weight because of the connection to his father.

The working day ended at around 4pm, but the three remained on site into the evening. As night fell, the atmosphere was described as light-hearted at first, but tensions beneath the surface had been building for some time. Witnesses later spoke of Williams as a domineering figure, a young man who liked his own way and had a habit of throwing his weight around.

By around 9:30pm, what had begun as “light-hearted fooling around” turned more pointed. Birdsall became the focus of the others’ attention. After retreating to his room in Block ‘F’ and locking himself inside, he was targeted with a hosepipe. Water was forced under his door once, then again after a pause, soaking the floor and invading what little refuge he had sought.

Inside the room, something shifted. Just before 9:45pm, Birdsall was seen assembling a 12-bore single-barrel shotgun he kept in a case. He placed cartridges in his pocket, loaded the weapon, and stepped out into the corridor.

Sensing danger, Melvyn Blades ran and locked himself in his own room. Raymond Williams, however, remained outside near a hosepipe reel. As Birdsall approached, Williams turned toward him. Words were exchanged — accounts later described Williams’ tone as dismissive, telling him in effect to put the weapon away.

What happened next took only seconds. At a distance of roughly one to four feet, Birdsall raised the shotgun and fired. The blast struck Williams in the back. He fell to the floor of the corridor, mortally wounded.

In the immediate aftermath, events unfolded with a strange clarity. At 10:10pm, police were alerted — not by a witness, but by Birdsall himself, who phoned Retford police station and said plainly, “I’ve just shot a man.”

When officers, including Detective Sergeant D. F. Hanley and Police Constable G. Hardy, arrived at Cottam Power Station, an ambulance was already leaving with Williams.

Inside Block ‘F’, they found a grim scene: blood pooled along the passageway and an empty 12-bore cartridge case lay outside a door.

Birdsall approached them without resistance. “It’s me you want. I’ve shot him,” he said. When asked who the victim was, he replied, “Roy Williams.” He then led officers to his room, where the shotgun was found on the bed.

As he was arrested, he offered an explanation that hinted at a longer story: “It’s been building up for a long time.” Later, at Retford police station, he gave a voluntary statement. When told that Williams had died in hospital, his reaction was immediate and human: “My God, what will his mother say?”

The investigation revealed that the relationship between Birdsall and Williams had been troubled for months. The two had met in Pontefract before travelling together to Cottam. According to statements presented in court, Williams had been aggressive and overbearing, frequently threatening violence and asserting control over others. Birdsall claimed that the events of that week — culminating in the hosepipe incident — had pushed him beyond his limits. “He was overbearing. He always wanted his own way,” he said. “Things came to a head that night.”

On Thursday the 17th of January 1967, Birdsall appeared before Retford Magistrates charged with the murder of Raymond Williams. Represented by Mr H. J. Gundill of Pontefract and granted legal aid, he was remanded in custody.
Detective Inspector K. P. Cox indicated that committal proceedings would follow, while Birdsall’s father sat in court as the case began to gather national attention.

Two months later, in March 1967, the case came before Nottinghamshire Assizes Court. The prosecution, led by Mr D. G. A. Lowe QC, painted a picture of deliberate escalation — of a young man who had armed himself and fired at close range into another’s back. The defence, however, led by Mr H. Skinner QC, did not deny the shooting but argued that it amounted to manslaughter, not murder, brought about by sustained provocation.

Birdsall told the jury that he had not intended to kill. “I think I meant to frighten him,” he said. He described locking himself away to avoid confrontation and feeling harassed and unable to escape. “They just would not leave me alone,” he admitted, explaining that by the time the second burst of water came under his door, he was “pretty mad.”

The jury took only minutes to reach their decision. They found him not guilty of murder, but guilty of manslaughter, accepting that provocation had played a significant role in the fatal act.

Mr Justice Veale sentenced Birdsall to five years’ imprisonment, describing the shooting as “a dreadful thing.”

For Pontefract, the case lingered as a sobering reminder of how quickly ordinary lives can spiral into tragedy. What began as youthful banter on a cold January evening had ended with a shotgun blast, a young man dead, and another facing years behind bars — a stark and lasting shadow cast over the town they both once called home.
Note:

Birdsall was found guilty at Nottinghamshire Assizes Court, but what were the Assizes Courts?

Assize courts were periodic courts in England and Wales that handled the most serious criminal cases, such as murder and r**e, as well as major civil disputes. These courts were presided over by visiting judges from higher courts who traveled to the main county towns on circuits, and they were replaced by the Crown Court in 1971.

Jurisdiction: Assize courts dealt with the most serious criminal offenses, known as felonies, which could include capital crimes. They also handled significant civil disputes, like land or money claims, and later, divorce cases. Less serious offenses were handled by lower courts like Quarter Sessions or Petty Sessions (magistrates' courts).

Structure: The courts operated on a circuit system, with judges traveling to different county towns twice a year to hold the courts. Local juries were summoned to hear the cases and return verdicts.

Abolition: The system of assize courts was abolished in England and Wales by the Courts Act 1971, and their functions were integrated into a single, permanent Crown Court.

06/06/2026

Cruel Treatment of Children

Grovetown, Pontefract, December 1883

A case that created a good deal of excitement in Pontefract and neighbouring towns, and one, the circumstances of which are most horrifying and heartrending too place in late 1883.

Eventually brought under the notice of the local police force, it appeared that for about a fortnight a man named Thomas William Golding, apparently about thirty-two years of age, had been residing in a house at Grovetown, and removed there from Dartmoor, in Kent, together with his four children and second wife, who was just nineteen years of age, and was the mother of only one of the children, and stepmother to the other three.

Owing to the man conducting himself somewhat strangely, keeping the doors of his house, back and front constantly locked, and never allowing three of his children to come downstairs (the cries of whom were at times bewildering) suspicion was aroused amongst the neighbours living close at hand, that the children, who had been placed in the cold damp chamber without fire or furniture, and of whose puny and emaciated faces they occasionally had a glimpse through the window, were being pined and starved to death.

Two of the neighbours moved with pity for the children and knocked at Golding's door and telling him they had heard his three children, to whom his present wife was stepmother, were badly, asked to be a allowed to see them, but Golding, stating that his children were all right, refused them admission. Further signs confirmed the suspicion of the neighbours there was something definitely wrong with arrangements in the Golding house. A married woman named Eliza Keighley entered the house, and forcing her way past Golding ran upstairs into the chamber and the scene was horrifying.

She found the poor children lying on the door looking wildly about them just on the point of death through starvation. This was on Wednesday - evening, and she immediately gave information to Superintendent Fearnside, at whose instigation Golding, was arrested, and to Mr. Leng, relieving officer, who gave an order for the admission of the three children into the workhouse.

The following are the names, e ages, and weights of the three children;

Maud, five years old, 31 lbs 4 oz.
Grace, three years, 23 lbs
Walter, two years, 17 lbs. 6 oz.

At the Borough Court, on Thursday, before W. Mathers, Esq. (in the chair), and J. Hartley, Esq., Golding was brought up in custody on the charge of having willfully neglected to allow his children under the age of fourteen years adequate food and clothing, whereby their health was seriously injured. The prisoner, who is a handsome-looking man, remained quiet during the hearing of the case, though guiltiness was a to be soon in his countenance, and he took one or two mysterious looks at his poor children who were present in court under the care of three female inmates from the workhouse; and to those present in court one look at the poor emaciated children, palid as death, indeed, literally speaking, "skeletons," for nothing but skin and bone was left-was quite sufficient.

The head of the youngest child was one mass of sores, and his body more emaciated than those of the little girls. The little boy's legs and body were shown to the Bench, and it was, indeed, a fearful and almost indescribable a spectacle.

Evidence was given by several neighbours and medical gentlemen. The Bench sentenced the prisoner to four months' imprisonment with hard labour.

Where was Grovetown, Pontefract?

Grovetown originally consisted of 55 terrace houses and was built in the 1870’s. The accommodation was built for the workforce who were employed in building the railway line which ran alongside. The railway was opened for traffic on 1st July 1879 after which the village was sold off and the houses rented out up to the demolition of the entire village over the winter of c.1962/3.

Grovetown was a small, self-contained terrace village on the edge of Pontefract, lying alongside the railway line near Grove Road and close to open farmland stretching towards Friarwood, Carleton and Chequerfield. Built in the 1870s as housing for railway workers, it consisted of just 55 modest Victorian houses arranged along four streets—Oak, Elm, Ash and Beech—giving it a close-knit, compact layout. Despite its proximity to town, Grovetown retained a distinctly rural character for much of its existence, surrounded by fields, allotments and farm land, with views across to Oxclose Farm and the wider Pontefract landscape. Life there was strongly shaped by coal mining and railway work, and the village developed a tight communal identity, where families were closely connected and shared both hardships and daily life. By the mid-20th century, however, urban expansion and redevelopment gradually absorbed and erased Grovetown, and it was ultimately demolished around 1962–63, leaving only memories and local history to mark what had once been a unique and closely bonded working-class community.

Address

Pontefract
WF81ES

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Warcry Publishing posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Category