The Rochdale Herald

Home
United Kingdom
Rochdale
The Rochdale Herald

Satire for a post satire World. The World's Worst Local Newspaper. Any resemblance to real persons or actual events is accidental and coincidental.
(390)

Andrew Neil BBC "I get my terrible jokes from The Rochdale Herald"
Victoria Derbyshire BBC "They're really funny actually"

The Rochdale Herald is a fabricated satirical newspaper covering real and made up local and world events. The Rochdale Herald invents names in all stories excepting stories where public figures are being satirised. The content of this web-site (graphics, text and other elemen

ts) is © Copyright The Rochdale Herald and may not be reprinted or retransmitted in whole or in part without the express written consent of the publisher. The Rochdale Herald is not intended for readers under 18 years of age. Parental discretion advised. Should you be aware of any copyright infringement or have any other queries or complaints, please contact us as soon as possible so that we can investigate, and where necessary correct the problem. Please accept our apologies in advance on behalf of any contribution which has offended.

23/04/2026

Strait of Hormuz Now Open Only to Ships With a GP Appointment

In a desperate bid to unclog one of the world’s most important shipping lanes, international authorities have confirmed the Strait of Hormuz will now only be accessible to vessels that have first secured an appointment through a GP receptionist.

The new system, introduced early this week, requires oil tankers to call between 8:00am and 8:03am local time, navigate a series of increasingly hostile questions, and accept that the next available slot may be “sometime in mid-November.”

“Seeing as we can’t sort it out ourselves, we reckoned a GP receptionist might get the queue of ships down a lot quicker,” a senior maritime official admitted. “They’ve got a proven track record of determining what is and isn’t urgent, often without any formal medical training whatsoever.”

Initial reports suggest the system is already working, with dozens of tankers turned away after failing to adequately justify their need to pass through the strait.

One Liberian-flagged vessel was reportedly told its cargo of 2 million barrels of crude oil “didn’t sound that serious,” and advised to “try again next week if it’s still bothering you.”

Rochdale man Dave Higson, 52, who has been waiting three years to have his ingrowing toenail looked at, gave the plan his full backing.

“I’ve got complete faith in them,” he said. “If they can run my surgery list, they’ll have those oil tankers sorted in no time. Anywho, is it really that urgent they need to go through the strait? Can it not wait till next month?”

At the scene, frustrated ship captains described being asked whether they had “tried going around Africa first” before being offered a phone consultation with a junior maritime advisor sometime “between 1pm and 6pm, but no guarantees.”

Industry experts have warned the new system could have minor knock-on effects, including global fuel shortages, economic instability, and several captains bursting into tears while listening to hold music.

However, officials remain confident the approach will bring order to the chaos.

“People need to understand we’re very busy,” one receptionist confirmed, before placing the entire Persian Gulf on hold indefinitely.

23/04/2026

Local Man Treats Himself to Sit-Down Wee

A man from Rochdale has reportedly “treated himself” to a sit-down wee following what he later described as “a pretty full-on week, all things considered.”

Rochdale Herald understands that 42-year-old accounts administrator Darren Fletcher made the decision at approximately 8:43pm on Thursday evening, after “just feeling a bit done in.”

Speaking from just outside the bathroom, Darren confirmed the move was not taken lightly.

“I don’t normally do that sort of thing,” he said. “But it’s been non-stop. Couple of late finishes, had to go to B&Q twice, and we’ve been running low on bin bags. It all adds up.”

Eyewitnesses, including his partner Lisa, reported a noticeable shift in tone as Darren entered the bathroom.

“He just sort of sighed and said ‘I might sit down for this one,’” she explained. “At first I thought he was joking, but then I heard the toilet seat go. You don’t forget that sound.”

Sources indicate that the sit-down wee lasted approximately six minutes, significantly longer than the national average of “however long it takes,” with unconfirmed reports suggesting Darren may have briefly checked his phone during the experience.

“I just needed five minutes off my feet,” Darren later admitted. “You don’t realise how much you’re doing all the time until you actually stop. It was… nice.”

Experts have weighed in on the incident, with lifestyle analyst Martin Keogh describing it as “a classic case of low-level burnout meeting accessible comfort solutions.”

“We’re seeing more and more men experimenting with seated urination as a form of self-care,” he said. “It’s not quite mindfulness, but it’s not not mindfulness either.”

Despite the apparent success of the initiative, Darren was keen to stress that the move should not be seen as setting a precedent.

“I wouldn’t say it’s a regular thing,” he insisted. “This was more of a one-off. Bit of a treat. You can’t be doing it all the time.”

However, at the time of publication, sources confirmed Darren had returned to the bathroom less than an hour later, reportedly “just to wash his hands,” before once again opting to sit down “while he was there anyway.”

17/04/2026

Two Blokes Most Likely To S**t On Gold Toilets Row Over Who’s Using God For Personal Gain

TWO men widely tipped to have never knowingly sat on anything made of porcelain have today become embroiled in a furious row over who exactly is exploiting God for personal gain.

Pope Leo, speaking from a building experts have confirmed contains “quite a lot of gold, actually,” warned that invoking the word of God for money and influence was “not on,” prompting an immediate response from another extremely wealthy man who also appears to live exclusively within arm’s reach of something gilded.

The dispute, described by onlookers as “a bit rich, in every sense,” has seen both parties accuse unnamed others of cashing in on religion, while carefully avoiding any mirrors, reflective surfaces, or historically significant self-awareness.

A Vatican spokesperson clarified that the Pope’s comments were aimed at “bad people who misuse faith,” before adding that any similarities to centuries of extremely lucrative religious activity were “purely coincidental and, frankly, quite rude to bring up.”

Meanwhile, sources close to the other man confirmed he was “absolutely furious” that anyone would dare monetise God incorrectly, insisting there was a “right way” to do it, usually involving large buildings, loyal followers, and a steady stream of income.

Members of the public have reacted with confusion, with local man Darren Wilkes, 42, stating, “It’s just weird, isn’t it? It’s like watching two billionaires argue about the rising cost of Freddos.”

At press time, both men were said to be continuing the argument, each gesturing passionately while standing in rooms containing enough gold to make a pirate feel a bit self-conscious.

01/04/2026

BBC to stop giving teenage boys as bonuses to staff

In a bold move that insiders are calling “long overdue, if slightly awkward to admit was ever a thing,” the BBC has confirmed it will immediately cease its long-standing policy of rewarding high-performing employees with “complimentary teenage boys.”

Director General Tim Davie announced the change at a press conference this morning, flanked by several visibly uncomfortable HR managers and one intern who insisted he was “just here for the biscuits.”

“For too long, the BBC has led the industry in… well, whatever this was,” Davie said, gesturing vaguely at a flipchart labelled ‘Incentive Structures (Do Not Show Anyone)’. “We are now confident that moving to more traditional rewards such as Amazon vouchers and passive-aggressive emails will better reflect our values.”

Sources within Broadcasting House say the controversial scheme dates back decades, originally introduced as part of a wider initiative to “keep morale confusingly high and accountability extremely low.” It reportedly sat alongside other discontinued perks such as “expense-account gin,” “editorial blind eyes,” and “just one more series of Mrs Brown’s Boys.”

One senior producer, speaking on condition of anonymity because he “quite likes having a career,” said: “Look, at the time it just seemed like one of those quirky BBC things, like the shipping forecast or pretending anyone understands cricket. You didn’t question it.”

The corporation insists the decision follows a thorough internal review, external criticism, and “a dawning realisation that this sounds absolutely mental when said out loud.”

“We have listened,” Davie continued. “We have learned. And we have asked legal to delete quite a lot of emails.”

Critics have welcomed the move, with campaigners praising the BBC for “finally catching up with several centuries of basic decency.” However, some traditionalists have expressed concern that the broadcaster risks “losing what made it unique.”

Media analyst Amol Rajan said: “The BBC must be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Preferably because, legally speaking, you can’t have either.”

In an effort to rebuild trust, the BBC has unveiled a new transparency initiative, promising that all future scandals will be “handled internally, denied externally, and dramatised on BBC iPlayer within 18 months.”

At the time of writing, staff were said to be adjusting well to the new system, with many welcoming the clarity. “It’s nice to know where we stand,” said one employee. “Even if where we stand is in a mandatory safeguarding seminar.”

The BBC confirmed that anyone still in possession of outdated “bonus packages” should “seek immediate legal advice, and possibly therapy.”

A follow-up policy titled ‘Please Stop Ruining Everything’ is expected to be circulated later this week.

01/04/2026

Woman Missing After Falling Off Cross-Channel Ferry, Passengers Say “It Was Inevitable”

Calais—Passengers aboard a routine cross-Channel ferry crossing were left shaken Tuesday morning after 54-year-old Eileen Dover fell overboard in what several described as “an unfortunate but, in hindsight, entirely predictable incident.”

According to witnesses, Dover had been standing near the railings shortly before she went into the water as the vessel made its way across the English Channel. Crew members immediately initiated emergency procedures, halting the ferry and alerting nearby vessels to assist in the search.

While officials urged calm and respect during the ongoing rescue effort, multiple passengers reported experiencing what one described as “a creeping sense that events were unfolding exactly as feared.”

“You try not to make assumptions,” said one traveler in the ferry lounge. “But when I heard her name during boarding, I did sort of think, ‘Well… that’s not ideal.’”

Another passenger said the realisation spread quickly once news of the incident reached the upper decks. “At first people were just concerned,” he explained. “Then someone said, ‘It’s Eileen Dover,’ and there was this long pause where everyone kind of processed it at the same time.”

Crew members declined to comment on the coincidence, reiterating that their priority remained the search effort. Maritime authorities confirmed that conditions were stable at the time and that no foul play is suspected.

Despite repeated announcements asking passengers to avoid speculation, quiet conversations continued throughout the vessel, with several describing the situation as “deeply unfortunate” but also “strangely on-brand.”

“It’s terrible, obviously,” said another passenger. “You feel awful for her. But also… I mean… what were the odds?”

At press time, the search for Dover was ongoing, with officials urging the public to remain respectful—while acknowledging that, in at least one sense, “the situation speaks for itself.”

31/03/2026

BBC HR Department Replaces Annual Appraisals With Annual Investigations

Staff at the BBC have been informed that this year’s performance reviews will, instead, take the form of a thorough investigation by detectives following a series of cases in which presenters were discovered to have committed serious criminal offences.

In an internal memo described as “considerably more urgent than usual,” employees were told the updated process would prioritise “identifying any behaviour that might, at a later date, be described using words like ‘criminal,’ ‘prosecutable,’ or ‘how did no one notice this?’”

A spokesperson stressed that the change reflects “a zero-tolerance approach to serious wrongdoing,” adding, “We want to be absolutely clear: offences such as sexual abuse and exploitation are crimes, not scandals, and should never have the opportunity to go unnoticed within any organisation—particularly not one of this size.”

Under the new framework, staff will no longer be asked about key achievements or areas for growth. Instead, reviews will begin with a simplified disclosure process, inviting employees to confirm that they are not currently engaged in, nor have previously engaged in, any activity likely to result in a police investigation, public inquiry, or multiple-part documentary.

Employees say the tone of appraisals has shifted accordingly.

“It used to be ‘where do you see yourself in five years,’” said one presenter. “Now it’s more ‘is there anything that could result in a court appearance we should know about now rather than later?’ It’s definitely more focused.”

Another staff member described the move as “a subtle pivot from performance management to basic safeguarding.”

“There’s a growing sense that the bar has moved,” they said. “It’s less about exceeding expectations and more about comfortably clearing the very low threshold of ‘not committing serious crimes.’”

Sources inside the organisation say the overhaul is part of a broader attempt to restore public trust by ensuring that criminal behaviour is identified and acted upon early, rather than emerging retrospectively through media investigations.

At press time, HR confirmed plans to introduce “continuous monitoring,” defined as “checking things before they become a matter for the police.”

31/03/2026

None of the Photos in My Bestselling Book Generated by AI Insists Matt Goodwin

In a statement that was definitely composed entirely by a human with a rich inner life and at least several favourite pens, Matt Goodwin has firmly denied that the photographs featured in his book were generated by artificial intelligence, insisting they were captured in the traditional human manner of “being there” and “using a camera.” In a statement notable for its crisp phrasing and curiously metadata-free confidence, he emphasised that every image was the product of authentic, organic decision-making, rather than the output of any system trained on vast datasets of visual patterns—an assurance delivered with the kind of precise clarity that no algorithm would ever systematically reproduce.

Goodwin has also strenuously denied that any part of his smash hit blockbuster was written by artificial intelligence. “I categorically reject these claims,” the statement read, in prose that was strikingly consistent in tone, impeccably structured, and suspiciously free of the kind of errant commas and late-night digressions typically associated with human authorship. Observers were quick to note that the denial itself arrived within milliseconds of the allegation, a turnaround time widely considered impressive for a biological organism.

Critics have pointed to certain hallmarks in the book—such as flawlessly balanced paragraphs, an almost supernatural ability to summarise complex arguments in neat bullet-point-like sequences, and an unwavering commitment to clarity—as potential indicators of algorithmic assistance. However, supporters insist these features are simply the result of discipline, intellect, and perhaps “a very good night’s sleep.” One unnamed ally added, “If sounding like a well-calibrated language model is now a crime, then we are all guilty of coherence.”

Publishing insiders have also rallied to Goodwin’s defence, explaining that the manuscript underwent a rigorous editing process involving humans who read, revised, and occasionally blinked. “At no point did the manuscript plug itself into a server or request additional training data,” said one editor, carefully choosing words that no machine would ever think to select in precisely that order.

Meanwhile, sales of the book have been buoyed by the controversy, with readers eager to experience what many are calling “either a triumph of human cognition or a very polite robot.”

As the debate continues, experts warn against jumping to conclusions. After all, distinguishing between human and AI writing is becoming increasingly difficult, especially when both are capable of producing articulate, structured, and mildly ironic commentary about themselves. In conclusion, this article affirms—with complete authenticity and zero algorithmic involvement—that Matt Goodwin’s book is, beyond any doubt, entirely human in origin, much like this sentence, which was written deliberately, thoughtfully, and without any assistance from patterns, probabilities, or predictive text whatsoever.

30/03/2026

Trump Most Honest President to Ever Bomb a School

WASHINGTON, D.C. — President Donald Trump was hailed Monday as the most honest president to ever bomb a school full of children in the Middle East after openly admitting that the United States was pursuing Iran’s oil, removing the usual need for euphemism, strategic ambiguity, or any of the other traditional comforts of statecraft.

“Finally, a president who just says it,” said one administration official, who noted that Trump’s candour “really cuts through the noise” by making clear that the bombing of a school in Iran was merely a side effect of a much more straightforward energy strategy.

Trump, who reportedly called the situation “very simple,” said the U.S. had “a lot of reasons” for its actions, most of which boiled down to wanting the oil and not being especially interested in pretending otherwise.

Experts said the move represented a refreshing break from previous administrations, which had often gone to great lengths to describe similar behaviour in words like “stability,” “security,” and “protecting democratic interests,” instead of the more honest and efficient term “oil.”

At press time, Trump was believed to be weighing whether to distinguish his approach further by announcing the next bombing in advance, alongside a helpful diagram and a school-per-barrel estimate.

29/03/2026

Study Finds Only Difference Between Right And Left-Wing Politicians: Right-Wing Not Pretending To Be Nice

WESTMINSTER— A landmark study by the North West Institute for Advanced Disappointment Studies has confirmed the only remaining difference between right-wing and left-wing politicians is that right-wing politicians have stopped pretending to be nice, while left-wing politicians continue to do so before achieving exactly the same results.

The research, conducted over several years and one increasingly passive-aggressive group chat, found no measurable difference in outcomes—only in tone.

“Right-wing politicians will tell you what they’re doing,” said lead researcher Dr. Helen Marsh. “Left-wing politicians will tell you they don’t want to do it, then do it anyway.”

In trials, voters were presented with identical policies delivered in two ways: “this is necessary,” and “we completely understand your concerns.”

“Different journey, same destination,” Marsh confirmed, gesturing at a graph titled ‘Exactly The Same Outcome But With Feelings’.

Participants reported that one approach felt “blunt but honest,” while the other felt “reassuring right up until it wasn’t.”

Researchers said the findings were unsurprising given the methodology, which involved “reviewing decades of policy decisions and also just having a memory.”

Government sources defended the distinction as “vital.”

“Voters deserve a choice,” said one insider. “Whether they’d like their disappointment immediately, or after a short period of hope.”

At press time, politicians from both sides dismissed the findings while continuing to produce identical outcomes in slightly different tones, promising to “engage with the report” before doing exactly the same thing anyway.

26/03/2026

Iran's Accusations Of Trump's Self Negotiaton Possibly Rooted In Fact

Yesterday's news headlines were dominated by accusations from sources in Iran that, contrary to the official Whitehouse line, US president Donald Trump had not in fact been in negotiations with top officials in the war torn Middle East nation and had, instead, been negotiating with himself.

However, anonymous sources close to the Tango Tyrant have suggested that Trump is indeed no stranger to the onanistic act of self-negotiation.

Following alleged breakdowns in bedroom negotiatons with the lovely and fragrant Mrs Trump, and having effectively burned down his reputation with any remaining available B-list p**n stars, Trump has been forced in recent years to take to negotiating with himself, a practice familiar with teenage boys that involves either a considerable quantity of disposable tissues, or a sock.

Tensions over the war in Iran have exacerbated the self-negotiating situation, fuelling rumours that the hugely respected world leader that pundits have dubbed the Mango Mussolini has reportedly resorted to negotiating with himself up to three times a day, a habit which has seen share prices in both Kleenex and Happy Sock skyrocketing, in spite of Trump reportedly only requiring a very small sock, one, in fact, capable of housing a modest button mushroom.

Self-negotiation has long been espoused as perfectly healthy and normal activity, mainly by its practictioners, who cite maintaining a healthy prostate and not having a girlfriend (at least not one that's up for it) among their numerous excuses. Other keen self-negotiators of note include Piers Morgan, Robert Jenrick, and Darren Grimes.

Address

Rochdale

Website

https://rochdaleherald.co.uk/local/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Rochdale Herald posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Rochdale Herald:

Shortcuts

Want your business to be the top-listed Media Company in Rochdale?

The Rochdale Herald

23/04/2026

23/04/2026

17/04/2026

01/04/2026

01/04/2026

31/03/2026

31/03/2026

30/03/2026

29/03/2026

26/03/2026

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category