05/08/2026
For this morning’s Talking about the Past Zoom session, 22 indexers – with about 300 years of cumulative indexing experience between them – met to discuss passing mentions. We took as a starting point the article “What not to index: a flow chart for passing mentions in book indexing” by Emma Warnken Johnson (Indexer 44 (2), June 2026 – paywall) which includes a flow chart for identifying passing mentions and making indexing decisions about them. Deciding what to leave out can be the most demanding part of indexing; Emma’s flowchart aims to improve consistency and avoid decision fatigue.
The flowchart is not for every entry, but only for those where there is some doubt about including a term. Emma’s flowchart uses the number or volume of mentions of a term, and its relation to the metatopic – the overarching topic of the book – as criteria for making decisions on its inclusion. Underpinning this is expert use of indexing software, which allows us to flag or label entries for review when editing the index.
Our group all agreed that these can be difficult decisions to make, and the flowchart generated a lot of debate. Considering proximity of a term to the metatopic can be helpful, but in very detailed books, what look like dozens of passing mentions all need to be indexed. And there are degrees of relation to the metatopic, so thinking about terms in this way can introduce more decisions, rather than cutting them down. And what looks like a passing mention at first sight might be a vital reference for the returning reader, who always needs to be considered along with readers exploring the book via the index.
As indexers, we are balancing the needs of the reader against representing the knowledge included in the book. The flowchart questions could work to help us consider whether we SHOULD include a term - will the index be diminished without it? and whether we COULD - can we make an argument for including it? As Rachel Gee said, indexers have a meta-indexing thought process going on while we index, and it’s important to listen to this and be aware of the reasons for our choices.
We acknowledged that decision fatigue is real, but not all present thought a flowchart was a solution – a break away from your desk can often be a better one.
Emma’s flowchart, like most writing on indexing, provides guidelines rather than rules. She has built flexibility into it, recognising that texts vary hugely, and noting that other factors – like reader and author expectations and considerations of fairness, visibility and representation – may change them. Her article stimulated a fascinating and wide-ranging discussion about how we make our indexing decisions.
In September our discussion will focus on indexing exhibition catalogues and in October we’ll return to the topic of indexing personal names. If you’re an SI member, do join us then – all members, from students to retired indexers, are very welcome.
You can read more about passing mentions in our blog post:
Women’s cycling road race by Bob Mical, used under a Creative Commons 2.0 licence [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/] One of the most frequent que