17/08/2026
We have evidence of secret conversations with Gov't directing judges on how to rule.”
— Osahene Alexander Afenyo-Markin, Minority Leader
This is exactly why it looks like Afenyo-Markin wants to discredit Ghana’s judiciary before the serious questions surrounding his own tenure at ECG are fully investigated. By casting doubt on judges and the judicial system in advance, he risks creating a convenient argument that any future legal action or unfavourable ruling against him or members of his political side is politically motivated.
If he genuinely has evidence that government officials are secretly directing judges on how to rule, he should produce it immediately and allow the appropriate institutions to investigate. These are extremely serious allegations and should be supported by evidence, not simply repeated as political rhetoric.
But these allegations must not distract Ghanaians from demanding accountability over what happened at ECG during the period Afenyo-Markin served as Board Chairman.
Afenyo-Markin himself publicly raised serious allegations concerning ECG, including claims that ECG officials and Customs officers had allegedly connived in the sale of containers containing cables, with some materials allegedly finding their way back to ECG.
That raises important questions. What did the Board know? When did it know? What investigations were conducted? Who authorised the transactions? Who benefited? What action was taken?
Afenyo-Markin has defended his tenure by arguing that some of the problems predated his appointment and that reforms were introduced under his leadership. That defence should be considered, but it should not prevent a proper and independent investigation into the entire matter, including decisions and transactions that occurred during his period of responsibility.
This is why EOCO needs to investigate the ECG matter thoroughly, including Afenyo-Markin’s tenure as Board Chairman.
EOCO should follow the evidence and establish exactly what happened with the missing containers, procurement, contracts, payments and any questionable transactions. Investigators should determine who knew what, who authorised what, where the money went and whether the state suffered any financial loss.
If Afenyo-Markin did nothing wrong, an independent investigation should establish that. But if evidence of wrongdoing involving anyone is uncovered, those responsible should face the law regardless of their political position.
Meanwhile, attacking GoldBod cannot become a convenient political diversion. If there is credible evidence of corruption at GoldBod, investigate it. If officials have committed wrongdoing, prosecute them. Nobody should be protected.
But GoldBod cannot become a smoke screen for the unanswered questions surrounding ECG.
Afenyo-Markin wants accountability from the current government. Fine. The same standard must apply to institutions he previously supervised.
Tell Ghanaians what happened at ECG. Tell us what the Board knew. Tell us what happened to the containers. Tell us who benefited. And let EOCO investigate the entire matter without fear or favour.
You cannot demand a microscope on GoldBod while expecting the country to develop amnesia about ECG. And you cannot undermine public confidence in the judiciary simply because you fear that tomorrow you may have to answer difficult questions before that same judicial system.
Ghana cannot fight corruption selectively. Accountability cannot depend on which political party is in power, and Ghana’s judiciary should not be discredited without evidence simply to prepare the ground for future political arguments.