20/08/2025
THE ORIGINS AND CONTINUITIES OF ASANTE–DORMAA HOSTILITIES
The rivalry between Asante and Domaa is one of the longest-standing political and cultural antagonisms in Akan history. Rooted in the military conflicts of the late seventeenth century and carried into the chieftaincy politics of modern Ghana, the Asante–Domaa relationship illustrates how history, identity, and memory continue to shape contemporary institutions.
Early Rivalries: The Seventeenth-Century Foundations
The origins of this rivalry date back to the reign of Kwaamanhene Nana Obiri Yeboah (c.1660–1680). At this time, Kwaaman (later Kumasi) was a rising polity determined to resist Denkyira overlordship. Obiri Yeboah sought to build alliances with neighboring states to form a common front, but Domaa—then based at Suntreso—consistently opposed the idea.
The opposition escalated into five successive wars, in which Domaa prevailed on each occasion. The fifth conflict proved fatal when Obiri Yeboah was killed in battle against the Domaa forces, led by Dei K**i. This event left a deep imprint in Asante oral traditions as the moment that revealed both the vulnerability of Kwaaman and the necessity of broader unity.
Osei Tutu I and the Birth of Asante Unity
After Obiri Yeboah’s death, leadership passed to his nephew, Kofi Tutu (later Osei Tutu I, r. c.1698–1717) of the Oyoko clan. His rise to power was secured through the patronage of Akwamuhene Nana Ansa Sasraku, who supplied 300 musketeers as bodyguards, and through the spiritual and political guidance of Okomfo Anokye.
Osei Tutu’s first major campaign was directed against Domaa. In this war, Domaa was defeated, their ruler Domaa K**i was beheaded, and the people expelled from Suntreso. Forced to migrate westward, they eventually resettled in the Bono area, where they continued to launch retaliatory campaigns. To contain them, Asante established a garrison at what later became Berekum, originally a military post of Asokore warriors.
On this foundation of conquest, Osei Tutu and Komfo Anokye forged a unifying spiritual-political ideology. The Golden Stool (Sika Dwa Kofi) was revealed in the 1690s, symbolizing the unity of Asante. Shortly thereafter, Asante defeated Denkyira at the Battle of Feyiase (1701), marking the full emergence of the Asante Confederacy.
Longstanding Points of Conflict
Domaa’s relocation did not end their tensions with Asante. Several enduring disputes characterized their relationship:
1. Exile and Relocation: Domaa’s present location is the result of their expulsion by Asante; at one stage, they were even forced further toward Gyaman.
2. Wars Against Neighboring States: Domaa waged campaigns against states like Sampa, Seikwa, and Berekum when these aligned with Asante.
3. Status in Manhyia: Traditionally, the Domaahene was assigned the ritual role of Kra Dwarafoɔ (soul washer) to the Asantehene, a duty perceived as humiliating.
4. 1935 Confederacy Restoration: When the Asante Confederacy was reconstituted under British indirect rule, Domaa opposed the move, though the majority of chiefs voted in favor.⁵
5. Brong-Ahafo Region Creation: In the 1950s, Domaa and Techiman lobbied Kwame Nkrumah for a separate region. In 1959, the Brong-Ahafo Region was formally created, cutting away the Western Asante area.
6. National House of Chiefs Disputes: Domaa and allies opposed the Asantehene’s life presidency of the National House of Chiefs, leading to Prempeh II’s withdrawal—a precedent still followed.⁷
7. Chieftaincy Rivalries: Domaa resisted the elevation of Sampa to paramountcy under Asantehene’s authority.
8. Bono Kyempem: Domaa and Techiman encouraged other Bono states to form Bono Kyempem, challenging Asante’s influence and pressing for the renaming of Western Ashanti to Brong-Ahafo.
9. Regional Reconfigurations: By contrast, Ahafo chiefs swore allegiance to the Golden Stool and later succeeded in creating Ahafo Region in 2018.
10. Persistent Loyalties: States such as Banda, Nkoranza, Seikwa, Mo, and Sampa continue to look to Manhyia rather than Bono Kyempem.
The Cultural Dimension of Pain
Beyond politics, cultural memory sustains the rivalry. During the great durbars at Manhyia, the ex*****oners (abrafoɔ) recite the victories of Asante history. These chants include the names of defeated rulers—Domaa K**i, Gyaamanhene, and King Adinkra of Bono-Manso.
In recent years, the Dormaahene Osagyefo Oseadeeyo Agyemang Badu II has publicly lamented the pain these recitations bring, but Asante custom forbids their removal. The reason lies in a sacred covenant: before the decisive Denkyira War of 1701, Kumawuhene Nana Tweneboah Kodua I sacrificed his life on condition that Asante would forever remember the names of its vanquished foes.⁸
From the death of Obiri Yeboah in the late seventeenth century to the Brong-Ahafo debates of the twentieth century and the chieftaincy rivalries reported in Ghanaian newspapers today, the Asante–Domaa relationship exemplifies the persistence of historical memory in shaping political identities.
As The Africa Report (2024) noted, contemporary clashes between Otumfuo Osei Tutu II and Dormaahene Agyemang Badu II are not merely personal disagreements, but echoes of centuries-old rivalries rooted in war, ritual, and contested authority. This is a living history—where the past continues to define the present.
[KOOKOspqs!
