Accra Main Daily

09/08/2025

Mental Health Advocacy: A Call to Action for Government Intervention in Ghana and Africa

In the wake of recent tragedies that have befallen our communities, including the loss of 16 precious children to a devastating incident and the heartrending helicopter accident claiming 8 lives, the need for a comprehensive and compassionate response from our government and society has never been more urgent. While the traditional gestures of visits, monetary assistance, and funeral organization are significant, they fall short of addressing the profound psychological and emotional aftermath experienced by the families and communities affected. It is imperative that we extend our support further by deploying psychologists and mental health professionals to provide the necessary therapy and mental health assistance to help these individuals overcome their tragedies.

The essence of mental health advocacy is not only to provide immediate support in times of crisis but also to foster a long-term, sustainable environment that prioritizes the psychological well-being of all citizens. In Ghana, as well as across Africa, we are at a critical juncture where the implementation of the knowledge and skills acquired by our educated youth in the field of mental health must be put into practice. The deployment of trained psychologists and mental health professionals to affected families and communities should be viewed not as an optional gesture but as a crucial and mandatory response by our government.

The loss experienced by the families of the 16 children and the 8 victims of the helicopter accident is unimaginable, and the path to healing is long and fraught with challenges. The complex nature of grief and trauma requires specialized intervention that goes beyond the scope of general support. Mental health professionals are equipped with the tools and expertise necessary to guide individuals through the process of healing, offering tailored therapies that address the unique needs of each person affected by these tragedies.

Moreover, the broader societal impact of these events cannot be overlooked. Our society is already grappling with numerous mental health challenges, exacerbated by a healthcare system that often fails to meet the needs of its citizens. The stigma surrounding mental health issues further complicates the situation, leaving many to suffer in silence. By taking decisive action to support the mental health of those directly affected by recent tragedies, the government can also send a powerful message about the importance of mental health care, potentially reducing stigma and encouraging others to seek help.

It is time for Ghana and Africa to embody the principles and values we instill in our children through education. We must transition from a reactive stance to a proactive and preventive approach in addressing mental health. This involves not only responding to crises but also building a robust mental health infrastructure that can support the well-being of all citizens, regardless of the circumstances. Investing in mental health services, including the training and deployment of professionals to communities in need, is an investment in the future of our nation.

The provision of mental health assistance to those affected by tragedies should be integrated into the national emergency response framework, ensuring that psychological support is as readily available as physical aid. This holistic approach to disaster response acknowledges the multifaceted nature of human resilience and recovery, emphasizing the importance of mental health as a fundamental component of overall well-being.

In conclusion, the government's deployment of psychologists and mental health professionals to support the families and communities affected by recent tragedies is not only a matter of urgency but also a critical step towards resetting our societal agenda to prioritize mental health. By doing so, we can begin to heal the wounds of those who have suffered unimaginable losses and lay the foundation for a more compassionate, resilient, and mentally healthy society. The time to implement the knowledge and skills we have acquired is now. Let us rise to the occasion and ensure that mental health advocacy translates into tangible actions that uplift and support the most vulnerable among us.

09/08/2025

The Imperative for Micro-Management in Ghana's Leadership for Tangible Change

In the wake of recent calamitous events in Ghana, the spotlight has been cast on the glaring deficiencies in the country's governance and administrative structures. The tragic loss of 16 precious young lives to a car accident, alongside the demise of 8 members of the administration, including key figures such as the Defense and Environment ministers in the Helicopter crash, serves as a grim reminder of the challenges that lie ahead. Condolences to all impacted. May their souls find rest. But these incidents underscore a pervasive lack of professionalism across various sectors, highlighting a critical need for a paradigm shift in how the nation is governed.

Ghana, like many African nations, is at a crossroads. The path it chooses now will determine the future prosperity and well-being of its citizens. The current state of affairs, where essential services and governance are marred by inefficiency and a lack of accountability, calls for a leadership style that is both visionary and hands-on. It is becoming increasingly clear that for Ghana, and indeed Africa, to navigate out of the quagmire of administrative lethargy and underdevelopment, leaders who are capable of micromanaging every area of the country to execute their vision are urgently needed.

The concept of micromanagement, often viewed negatively in the corporate world, takes on a different connotation in the context of national governance, especially in scenarios where broad systemic failures have been normalized. Effective micromanagement in this sense involves leaders immersing themselves in the minutiae of governance, ensuring that their vision for development is translated into actionable strategies that are meticulously implemented and monitored at all levels.

The Current Governance Quagmire

The recent tragedies highlight a systemic failure that transcends individual sectors, pointing to a complete lack of professionalism in governance and service delivery. This deficiency is most acutely felt by the vulnerable and marginalized segments of the population. When access to basic healthcare necessitates personal connections or when citizens are compelled to provide their own medical supplies due to inadequacies in the healthcare system, it is a glaring indication that the government has abdicated its responsibility to its citizens.

The notion that the government is supposed to work for the "least among us" is not merely an idealistic aspiration but a fundamental principle of governance. However, the reality on the ground in Ghana starkly contrasts with this principle. The incidents of the past two weeks are symptomatic of a broader malaise affecting the nation – a malaise characterized by a disconnect between governance and the needs of the populace.

The Case for Micromanagement

For Ghana to surmount these challenges, a radical departure from the status quo is imperative. Leaders must adopt a hands-on approach to governance, one that involves a granular oversight of administrative functions and a relentless pursuit of efficiency and professionalism. This entails a comprehensive overhaul of the existing bureaucratic structures to eliminate inertia and foster a culture of accountability and service excellence.

Micromanagement, in this context, is not about leaders entrenching themselves in every trivial detail but rather ensuring that policies and initiatives are effectively implemented and that the intended outcomes are achieved. It involves setting clear benchmarks for performance, regularly reviewing progress against these benchmarks, and being willing to make the necessary adjustments to stay on course.

Towards a New Dawn

The vision for a new Ghana – a Ghana where governance is responsive, efficient, and inclusive – is attainable. However, it requires leaders who are not only visionary but also pragmatic and hands-on. Leaders who are willing to dive deep into the intricacies of governance to ensure that their vision is not lost in translation but is effectively actualized in the lives of the citizens.

The road ahead is undoubtedly challenging, but the events of the past two weeks serve as a clarion call for a reinvigorated approach to governance. It is a call for leaders who are committed to transforming the administrative landscape of Ghana, ensuring that the government truly serves the needs of all its citizens, especially the "least among us."

In conclusion, the journey towards noticeable change in the administration of all areas of the country is a marathon, not a sprint. It requires sustained effort, unwavering commitment, and a leadership style that is both visionary and meticulously hands-on. For Ghana, and indeed for Africa, the time for such leadership is now. The path to a brighter, more prosperous future is paved with the hard work of today's leaders, who must be willing to micromanage every area of the country to bring their vision to fruition. Only then can we hope to see a noticeable change in the administration of all areas of the country, paving the way for a new era of prosperity and well-being for all Ghanaians.

26/07/2025

The Principle of Reciprocity in Diplomatic Appointments: A Case Study of Ghana

In international relations, the principle of reciprocity stands as a fundamental tenet guiding the conduct of affairs between sovereign states. This principle, which champions a mutual exchange of privileges or concessions, is particularly salient in the context of diplomatic appointments. It is predicated on the notion that the opportunities one country offers to the citizens of another should be reciprocated in kind, thereby fostering a balanced and equitable relationship between nations.

The recent controversy surrounding the appointment of a naturalized South Korean, Kojo Choi, as an ambassador by President John Mahama, has reignited the debate on adherence to the principle of reciprocity in diplomatic appointments. Fadi Dabbousi have castigated the National Patriotic Party (NPP) for rejecting his appointment during the presidency of Akuffo Addo because of his Lebanese roots. But Akuffo Addo and the NPP is right in doing so under the principle of reciprocity. Fadi should take this issue up in his native Lebanon. Once that changes, Ghana will do same.

The crux of the argument lies in the observation that if a Ghanaian naturalized in South Korea cannot ascend to government positions in South Korea, then the same principle should apply in Ghana. This stance is not rooted in xenophobia or an aversion to foreign nationals but rather in the pursuit of fairness and the protection of national interests. The principle of reciprocity ensures that no country is disproportionately advantaged or disadvantaged in its diplomatic exchanges.

Moreover, the debate extends beyond the specific case of South Korea. For instance, if a naturalized Ghanaian cannot ascend to government positions in Lebanon, then naturalized Lebanese in Ghana should expect the same treatment. This is not to diminish the contributions of naturalized citizens to their adopted countries, which are often substantial and enrich the cultural and economic fabric of the nation. However, the application of the principle of reciprocity in diplomatic appointments serves as a safeguard for national sovereignty and self-preservation.

It is essential to recognize that the principle of reciprocity does not preclude the appointment of naturalized citizens to positions of influence or authority. Instead, it calls for a nuanced approach that considers the policies and practices of their countries of origin. In instances where reciprocal opportunities exist, the appointment of naturalized citizens to diplomatic roles can serve as a testament to a country's inclusivity and openness.

The debate surrounding Kojo Choi's appointment underscores the need for a clear and consistent policy framework governing diplomatic appointments. Such a framework should explicitly address the principle of reciprocity, outlining the criteria under which naturalized citizens may be considered for diplomatic roles. This would not only ensure fairness and equity in diplomatic appointments but also reinforce Ghana's commitment to upholding the principles of international law and order.

In conclusion, the principle of reciprocity is a cornerstone in the conduct of international affairs, particularly in the realm of diplomatic appointments. The controversy surrounding the appointment of Kojo Choi as an ambassador highlights the importance of adhering to this principle to ensure balanced and equitable relationships between nations. While the inclusion of naturalized citizens in government positions can enrich a nation's diplomatic corps, it is imperative that such appointments are made in consideration of reciprocal opportunities offered by their countries of origin. By championing the principle of reciprocity, Ghana can navigate the complex landscape of international relations with fairness, integrity, and respect for national sovereignty.

25/07/2025

Reciprocity and Governance: A Considered Approach to Appointing Naturalized Ghanaians to High Government Office

In the intricate dance of international relations and domestic governance, the principle of reciprocity plays a pivotal role, especially when it pertains to the appointment of naturalized citizens to positions of significant governmental authority. A case in point is the scenario of appointing Kojo Choi, a naturalized Ghanaian as an ambassador to South Korea. Under the current global diplomatic norms and practices, such an appointment should be virtually unthinkable, primarily due to the absence of reciprocity. South Korea, like many nations, has stringent regulations regarding the appointment of non-native individuals to high-ranking government positions, a policy that mirrors the broader Asian approach to governance and strategic influence.

This lack of reciprocity should serve as a guiding principle for Ghanaian leaders in their appointment policies. The essence of governance, particularly in a country as vibrant and diverse as Ghana, should not be diluted by indiscriminately appointing naturalized foreigners to positions of power. Such actions not only undermine the value of Ghanaian citizenship but also send a problematic message to the international community and the citizenry about the prerequisites for governmental leadership in Ghana.

Ghana, much like any sovereign nation, must navigate the global stage with a keen awareness of the power dynamics at play. Ghanaian nationals are making significant contributions across the world, often from positions where they do not enjoy reciprocal privileges or rights. This global engagement, while beneficial, underscores the need for a balanced and strategic approach to the appointment of individuals to critical national roles. When Ghanaian leaders consider appointing naturalized citizens to high office, it is imperative that they weigh the implications of such decisions on Ghana's international standing and the precedent it sets for governance.

The argument against the appointment of naturalized foreigners to high government office is not one of xenophobia or insularity. Rather, it is a call for a strategic, long-term vision for Ghana's governance and international relations. Asian societies, noted for their strategic foresight, offer a model in this regard. They are renowned for their long-term planning and the prioritization of national interest and cultural integrity in governance. This approach has enabled them to cultivate and project soft power effectively, ensuring that their global engagements enhance their national stature and strategic objectives.

Ghana can draw valuable lessons from this. The appointment of government officials should be more than a mere reflection of an individual's love for Ghana or their naturalization status. It should be a strategic decision that considers the individual's ability to contribute to Ghana's long-term goals and the message their appointment sends about Ghanaian governance and its values. It is crucial that Ghana does not cheapen its governance by failing to apply the principle of reciprocity that other nations, including those in Asia, consider fundamental.

This is not to say that naturalized Ghanaians should be barred from serving their adopted country. On the contrary, Ghana's strength lies in its diversity and the contributions of all its citizens, whether by birth or naturalization. However, when it comes to appointing individuals to positions of significant national power and international representation, a more nuanced approach is warranted. Such appointments should be strategic, reflecting a deep understanding of international norms and the principles of reciprocity. They should also underscore the value Ghana places on its sovereignty and the integrity of its governance system.

In conclusion, as Ghana continues to assert itself on the global stage, its leaders must navigate the complexities of international relations and domestic governance with wisdom and foresight. The principle of reciprocity should be a cornerstone of this approach, particularly regarding the appointment of naturalized citizens to high government office. By doing so, Ghana will not only safeguard its governance but also enhance its stature and influence in the international arena. This requires a commitment to strategic, long-term planning and a deep appreciation of the global power dynamics at play. Only then can Ghana fully realize its potential on the world stage, ensuring that its governance is respected and its citizens, whether at home or abroad, are empowered.

24/07/2025

A Call for Tax Reform In Ghana : A Pathway to Tackling Unemployment and Stimulating Investment

In the heart of West Africa, Ghana stands as a beacon of economic potential and growth. However, this potential is significantly hampered by a tax regime that, while designed to bolster government revenues, inadvertently stifles business expansion, job creation, and investment. The crux of the matter lies in the cumulative tax burden placed on businesses, notably through the National Health Insurance Levy (NHIL) of 2.5%, the Ghana Education Trust Fund Levy (GETFund) of 2.5%, a Value Added Tax (VAT) of 15%, and a COVID-19 Health Recovery Levy of 1%, collectively amounting to a 21% tax payment to the government. This, coupled with a corporate tax rate of 25%, presents a formidable challenge to businesses striving for growth and sustainability in an increasingly competitive global market.

The Impact of High Taxation on Business Growth and Employment

The essence of a thriving economy lies in its ability to foster an environment where businesses can expand, innovate, and employ. However, when businesses are compelled to allocate 21% of their capital to tax payments, the ripple effects are profound. Firstly, this high tax rate significantly diminishes the capacity of businesses to reinvest their profits into expansion activities, such as upgrading technology, enhancing product offerings, or expanding operational facilities. These are critical components of business growth that not only increase competitiveness but also create numerous employment opportunities.

Moreover, the high tax burden makes it exceedingly challenging for businesses to add more individuals to their payroll and to offer livable wages. This is particularly concerning in a country where unemployment rates need to be addressed proactively to ensure social stability and economic prosperity. The ability of businesses to hire more personnel and to pay wages that reflect the cost of living is essential for stimulating economic activity and reducing poverty levels.

The Dilemma of Low Returns on Investment

The current tax regime poses a significant dilemma for investors, both local and international. With businesses using 21% of their capital allocation for tax payments to the government and facing a corporate tax rate of 25%, the resultant return on investment (ROI) is often less than 2%. This low ROI is a deterrent to investment, as it undermines the financial viability and attractiveness of investing in Ghana. Investors are naturally inclined to seek environments where their capital can yield higher returns. Therefore, the existing tax structure not only hampers the expansion of existing businesses but also discourages potential investors from injecting capital into the Ghanaian economy.

A Call for Tax Reform

The need for tax reform in Ghana is undeniable. A restructured tax system that lowers the burden on businesses could serve as a catalyst for economic revitalization. Reforming the tax system to encourage business growth and investment involves several key considerations. Firstly, there is a critical need to reassess and possibly reduce the cumulative tax rate that businesses face. Reducing the NHIL, GETFund Levy, VAT, and COVID-19 Health Recovery Levy could significantly enhance businesses' ability to reinvest profits and expand operations.

Secondly, revisiting the corporate tax rate is essential. A reduction in the corporate tax rate could make Ghana a more attractive destination for investment, thereby driving economic growth and job creation. It is also imperative to introduce tax incentives for sectors that have the potential to drive economic growth and employment.

Conclusion

The current tax regime in Ghana, characterized by a high cumulative tax burden on businesses, is a significant impediment to economic growth, investment, and employment creation. The government's reliance on these tax revenues for funding essential services is understandable. However, there is a pressing need to balance revenue generation with the imperative of creating a conducive environment for business expansion and investment. Tax reform, therefore, emerges as a critical agenda that requires immediate attention. By adopting a more favorable tax structure, Ghana can unlock its economic potential, stimulate investment, and significantly reduce unemployment. The path to prosperity for Ghana lies in a tax system that supports, rather than stifles, business growth and development.

14/07/2025

The Misguided Quest for Reparations by Africa's Current Leadership

In the ongoing discourse surrounding the historical injustices and the devastating impacts of colonialism in Africa, the conversation about reparations has taken center stage. The notion that the descendants of those who suffered can receive some form of compensation for the atrocities and exploitation faced by their ancestors is a compelling one. However, this noble pursuit risks being overshadowed by the current generation of African leaders, whose governance has often been marked by misdirection and sabotage rather than the upliftment and betterment of their people.

The ancestors, whose suffering and tears have paved the way for the conversations we are having today about reparations, did not endure their hardships so that their legacy could be mishandled by leaders who have, in many instances, failed to prioritize the welfare of millions of African children. The compounded suffering, a result of both historical injustices and contemporary failures, cannot and should not be bequeathed to a generation of leaders who have not demonstrated the capacity for selflessness, integrity, and visionary leadership.

The African Union (AU) and its member states would do well to redirect their focus from the pursuit of reparations under the current leadership to fostering a generation of leaders who embody the ideals necessary for truly uplifting the continent. The fixation on reparations, while understandable, diverts attention and resources from critical issues that require immediate attention, such as governance reform, economic development, healthcare, education, and combating corruption.

The stark reality is that corrupt and bereft African leaders need to recalibrate their expectations regarding reparations. This generation of African leaders, characterized by a lack of foresight and an abundance of self-interest, is unlikely to be the recipient of such reparations. The international community, aware of the governance issues plaguing many African nations, is hesitant to allocate resources that may not reach the intended beneficiaries—the countless individuals and communities still reeling from the legacies of colonialism and exploitation.

Instead, the focus should be on cultivating a generation of African leaders who are equipped with innovative ideas, a selfless approach to leadership, and a commitment to genuinely uplifting their people. This new generation should strive to embody the principles and values that would make them worthy successors to the ancestors' legacy and rightful recipients of any reparations that may come. They should be leaders who prioritize transparency, accountability, and the equitable development of their nations above all else.

The path forward requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including African governments, civil society, the international community, and, importantly, the African citizenry. Education and empowerment programs that foster ethical leadership, critical thinking, and civic responsibility are essential. Moreover, there must be a robust mechanism for holding leaders accountable for their actions and ensuring that they serve in the best interest of their people, not their self-interests.

In conclusion, while the quest for reparations is grounded in a legitimate and moral claim to justice for historical wrongs, the current generation of African leaders is ill-equipped to steward such a monumental task. Their track record of misleadership and sabotage does not inspire confidence that they would manage reparations in a manner that truly honors the ancestors' suffering or addresses the needs of the present and future generations. Therefore, the African Union and its member states should prioritize the cultivation of a new generation of leaders—leaders who can carry forward the mantle of progress, integrity, and genuine service to the continent. Only then can the conversation about reparations be revisited with any hope of success and meaningful impact.

13/07/2025

https://youtu.be/x_H89GhOxb8?si=iRQorPSl-Wkj760-

Over To You Basintale Put The 5k and 3K Men and Women to Better Community Empowerment Initiatives

In a remarkable display of community spirit and dedication, approximately 20,000 women in Burkina Faso have come together to build roads for free as part of a visionary project under the leadership of Ibrahim Traore. This initiative, which has caught the attention of both national and international observers, serves as a powerful example of how collective action and volunteerism can lead to significant infrastructural development, even in the absence of substantial financial resources.

The project, showcased in a compelling YouTube video titled "20,000 WOMEN BUILD ROADS FOR FREE IN BURKINA FASO UNDER IBRAHIM TRAORE'S VISION," highlights the extraordinary efforts of these women who, armed with basic tools and an unwavering resolve, are literally paving the way for progress in their communities. This initiative is not just about building roads; it's a statement about empowerment, resilience, and the power of collective action.

For those unfamiliar with the context, Burkina Faso is a landlocked country in West Africa, facing numerous challenges, including political instability, economic constraints, and infrastructural deficits. In this light, the road-building project spearheaded by these women under Traore's vision is not just commendable; it's revolutionary. It serves as a practical lesson in community-driven development, showcasing how hands-on participation can lead to tangible improvements in the quality of life.

This initiative stands in stark contrast to the often violent and divisive tactics associated with political campaigns and election-related violence, which have plagued many nations, including Ghana. The message is clear: development and progress cannot be achieved through conflict and discord. Instead, it requires unity, hard work, and a commitment to positive action. The women of Burkina Faso, through their actions, are demonstrating a viable pathway to community development that eschews violence and division in favor of cooperation and collective effort.

Moreover, this project serves as a rebuke to the notion that significant societal changes require top-down approaches, often characterized by political rhetoric and promises. The women's road-building initiative in Burkina Faso underscores the potential of grassroots movements to effect real change. It's a call to action for other communities and nations to learn from, copy, and start similar projects that leverage the power of their people for communal benefit.

Critically, this initiative also challenges gender stereotypes and norms, particularly in a region where women's roles have traditionally been confined to certain spheres. By taking on the physically demanding and technically challenging task of road construction, these women are not only contributing to their communities' infrastructural development but also paving new paths for female empowerment and gender equality.

In contrast to the often-cited narrative of African countries relying heavily on foreign aid and intervention for development, the road-building project in Burkina Faso is a testament to the continent's untapped potential for self-sufficiency and internal development. It's a narrative of hope, resilience, and the indomitable spirit of its people, especially its women.

The message emanating from Burkina Faso is potent and timely, particularly for nations like Ghana, where political unrest and election-related violence have undermined development efforts. The call for a "National Day of Prayers" and the emphasis on resetting Ghana's developmental agenda under the NDC and Mahama Administration must be matched with actionable initiatives that engage the populace in meaningful, constructive activities akin to what is being witnessed in Burkina Faso.

In conclusion, the road-building project in Burkina Faso under Ibrahim Traore's vision is not just a story about infrastructure development; it's a narrative about empowerment, community spirit, and the transformative power of collective action. It serves as a beacon of hope and a practical guide for other nations grappling with similar challenges. As the world watches the remarkable endeavor of these 20,000 women, it's an opportune moment for communities worldwide to reflect on the essence of true development and the potential within each individual to contribute to meaningful, lasting change. Over to you Basintale and the 5k and 3k men and women.

In Burkina Faso, a revolutionary initiative is underway, led by Ibrahim Traore's vision. Over 20,000 women have come together to build roads, and the most as...