14/12/2024
We entered the election season with a strong sense of optimism, convinced that victory was firmly within our reach, an election that, under different circumstances, we could have won quite comfortably. Our opponents were well-prepared, and their organizational structure was highly efficient, allowing them to effectively engage with the electorate. They knew how to appeal to peopleβs emotions, displaying vulnerability and even shedding tears when necessary to elicit sympathy.
Everyone must understand that we collectively bear some responsibility for this disappointing defeat. A political party should not be treated like a religion, and allegiance cannot and should not be forced upon anyone. Instead, politics should be grounded in principles of tolerance and genuine connection. How we communicate is vital in the political arena. Individuals must choose their words carefully, especially when addressing an audience through a microphone.
A significant amount of contentious rhetoric during the campaign was entirely avoidable, and for instance, openly expressing that we could succeed without the support of certain groups was not only ill-advised but ultimately detrimental, as it alienated those we desperately needed. Politics hinges on numbers, public support is essential.
Reflecting on our campaign, we can see that we lost our core base of supporters. We became disconnected from the grassroots individuals who genuinely believe in our mission, and we alienated our financial backers, who are crucial for sustaining party operations. Leadership during this time appeared to be intoxicated by power, exhibiting a troubling unwillingness to listen to constructive feedback and advice. This situation was not inevitable, and it was preventable. If only the leadership had been open to dialogue and receptive to suggestions, we might have navigated the electoral landscape more successfully and secured a better outcome.