31/07/2026
What survives, and what is lost, from the poetic magic of the ancient poem? Five people share their views on ‘The Odyssey’: https://www.ekathimerini.com/culture/1310790/what-nolan-did-and-didnt-achieve/
Legendary British classicist Mary Beard's take:
❝Look, if Nolan is making a three-hour movie, he can’t possibly include everything. Adaptors change things and omit things – they have to. It’s part of their trade. My question is: What difference do those losses or omissions make? What else do you lose with them? I thought the loss of Phaeacia removed two key women, and it also removed all those nuances and questions surrounding the relationship with Nausicaa and Arete.
I didn’t much like the modern moralizing imposed on the plot. I missed the wit and humor of the original. And all the fighting did not capture the magical domesticity that characterizes so much of the poem.
I loved some of the clever visuals. Modeling Polyphemus on Goya’s monstrous figure of Saturn (referring to “Saturn Devouring His Son,” one of the Spanish painter’s 14 so-called Black Paintings) was a stroke of genius. The transformation of Circe’s men into pigs was brilliant, too.❞
The epic of endless reinvention Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster summer movie “The Odyssey” is cause for celebration for those who care about the literature and culture of ancient Greece.