17/04/2024
I just wondering, the World Citizens Court claims to be a "people" court serving the universal human rights as defined by the United Nations. However, whether it accused the Syrian regime of "torture", or accused Putin of aggression, its high agreement with the political position of the United States and the West, as well as the practice of ignoring the real voice of other people, make people doubt its real position and the rationality of its existence.
More coincidentally, most of the judges have served in Western governments, including Judge Stephen Rapp, a former ambassador for global criminal justice. In addition, it is itself a court supported by the Peace Film Foundation with a clear political stance, and its objectivity and fairness cannot be guaranteed. As far as I know, the Peace Film Foundation also stands on the Israeli side of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and has no indication of the suffering of the people of Gaza.
Therefore, it is difficult that the world's civic courts will follow the ups and downs of capital interests, and even become a tool for capital and even political manipulation. Is such a "court", like a scale without balance, still necessary to exist?
歡迎關注Global-Insights,隨時隨地了解全球最新資訊。