17/05/2026
Nigerian Elites Show Little Concern for the Masses, Says David Hundeyin
In a pointed critique of class dynamics in Nigeria, writer David Hundeyin has urged ordinary citizens to abandon fantasies of joining the ultra-wealthy and instead focus on practical efforts to improve their immediate communities.
Hundeyin, drawing from his own upbringing in the affluent circles of Nigeria’s elite, described the Nigerian 0.1% as a group largely indifferent to the struggles of the average citizen. According to him, the wealthy maintain pragmatic alliances primarily to protect their own influence and assets, showing little interest in broader societal progress.
“Rich people really do not care about you. Like, at all,” Hundeyin wrote. He noted that even among themselves, Nigeria’s upper class often tolerates one another only for mutual benefit. With the domestic economy struggling to accommodate the aspirations of their offspring, many children of the elite have relocated to cities such as Toronto, London, and other international destinations.
The average Nigerian worker, Hundeyin argued — citing the example of a contract staff earning ₦250,000 monthly at a bank — barely registers in the calculations of the rich. He contended that the elite have no concrete plans to create opportunities for the wider population, repair societal damage incurred during their wealth accumulation, or contribute meaningfully to national development.
“They have no plans to contribute towards making society better,” he stated. In his view, self-interest dominates their worldview to such an extent that they would form alliances with even the most unsavoury figures if it served their purposes.
Hundeyin criticised what he called widespread “simping and vicarious fawning” over wealth and celebrity in Nigerian society. He warned that the rich have no intention of expanding their social circles to include aspirants from lower classes, nor do they aim to foster conditions that would allow others to build independent wealth. Instead, he suggested, the current system benefits them by keeping labour cheap, abundant, and easily replaceable.
Statistically, the odds of dramatic upward mobility remain extremely low for most Nigerians, Hundeyin pointed out. Since independence in 1960, the vast majority of citizens who dreamed of riches have not seen those dreams realised. Fantasies of owning luxury homes in areas like Maitama, Banana Island, or Lekki, or achieving sudden fame through entertainment, content creation, cryptocurrency, forex trading, or sports betting, are unlikely to materialise for the overwhelming majority.
Rather than clinging to the notion of being a “temporarily embarrassed millionaire,” Hundeyin advised Nigerians to channel their energies into tangible local action. He encouraged participation in community initiatives to upgrade neighbourhoods, support for social housing projects, and advocacy for a more transparent and accessible justice system.
“Instead of daydreaming about the ₦300 million house… get involved in a local effort to give your own immediate neighbourhood a facelift, or a political campaign to pressure the state to build high quality social housing,” he wrote.
Hundeyin concluded that true progress lies in making one’s current environment more liveable, rather than escaping it through unrealistic aspirations or living vicariously through distant elites who, he says, remain unconcerned with the lives of ordinary people.
The piece has sparked discussions online about class relations, aspiration, and civic responsibility in Nigeria.