11/02/2026
Where does the patient go?
NEET-PG 2025 has triggered a nationwide debate after qualifying cut-offs were reduced to unprecedented levels. This year, postgraduate medical seats have reportedly been allotted with scores as low as 4 in Orthopaedics and 44 in Gynaecology. For reserved categories, the qualifying cut-off has been set at –40, a move that has drawn both attention and concern.
The decision, taken by the Government of India, aims to address persistent seat vacancies across medical colleges. By lowering eligibility thresholds, authorities hope to ensure that valuable PG seats do not go unfilled, particularly in non-clinical and less preferred branches. On paper, the objective is efficiency and access.
However, the development has sparked questions around academic standards, meritocracy, and long-term implications for healthcare quality. Medical associations have expressed unease, arguing that extreme dilution of cut-offs risks undermining confidence in postgraduate training. Several petitions and representations are already under judicial consideration.
Supporters counter that entrance scores alone should not define clinical competence and that the system must adapt to structural shortages. Critics respond that reform should strengthen training pipelines, not simply lower entry bars.
As courts, policymakers, and the medical community weigh competing priorities, one issue is clear: NEET-PG 2025 has forced a critical conversation about balancing access, standards, and the future of medical education in India.
And finally, where does the patient go?
�