01/03/2022
Deeply moving saga of Kashmir
• Joydip Ghoshal •
If the security of the land
Calls for a life without conscience…
Then the security of land
Is a threat to all of us - (Paash)
As part of the concerned citizen's initiative Dinesh Mohan , Harsh Mander, Navsharan Singh , Pamela Phillipose, Tapan Boe travelled across Kashmir valley in the winter of 2016 which was torn, lacerated with pain. The outcome was the book- Blood, Censored when Kashmiris became the Enemy. The killing of 22 years old Burhan Wani by the security forces became a rallying point for public rage and anguish. Infuriated crowds joined his funeral protest. The valley witnessed massive protest march . Security forces fired pellets upon the infuriated protestors . As a result many young protestors, bystanders were blinded and grievously injured or incapacitated for the rest of life. Most deaths were caused by injuries- waist above, without any warning fire. In Qazigund in Anatnaag district a boy was allegedly shot with pellets and drowned in a nullah . Police filed counter FIRs . It spoke of large violent mob attacking Central Reserve Police Force with lathi, bomb. The boy according to FIR was critically injured when the force tried to disperse the crowds using loud speakers, tear gas. His family claimed that the boy was not part of the protestors. In the old town of Baramulla a mechanic who could not walk without crutches and suffered from physical and visual impairment was also booked under Public Security Act. A stone mason from Khanpora in Baramulla district was wounded with pellets but he was not allowed for treatment. He was booked under the act. There was no proportionality of the state response. Stone pelting was met by pellet firing.
Blood, censored also discussed several reports that point out the role of individuals and law- enforcing machineries.
In 2009 IPTK and /APDP published a report Buried Evidence: unknown, unmarked and mass grave . It documented the cases of 2700 unmarked grave. They conducted fact finding in 55 villages in Bandipora, Baramulla, and Kupwara. In 2012 IPTK/APDP brought out another report Alleged perpetrators- stories of impunity in Jammu and Kashmir. It collected information regarding Gow Kadal Killings and Pathribal Encounter. Another report titled Structure of violence investigated instances of violence committed by security forces. Another report titled Amarnath Jatra: A militarised pilkgrimage published in association with Bangaalore based Study group EQUATIONS laid bare resource monopolization and instances of land grab and ecological devastation. Noted filmmaker |Sanjay Kak edited a book titled witness / Kashmir/ 1986- 2016 / nine photographers.
The violent protest of stone pelting left in their wake an epidemic of dead eyes. Army chief at that time issued warnings. Close on the heel of those warnings the DG of Central Reserve Police Force stated in unequivocal terms that the army would continue its use of pellet gun upon the protesting civilians. The only concession was that the guns would be fitted with deflector which would reduce the chances of hitting the pellets on faces. But if the soldier did not adhere to the protocol it would not be feasible. The authors cited examples to illustrate that the government's masculine Kashmir policy remained unchanged. Eighty per cent of the injured were below 25 years. The situation was described by New York Times as ' epidemic of dead eyes'. The Guardian reports ' In a matter of four to five week this summer , Indian troops with a clear mandate to be unsparing , wounded over 10, 000 people. Five- year- old Johra was admitted into Srinagar hospital with laceration in her abdomen and legs. She was one of the youngest victims. Swarm of pellets pierced fourteen - year- old Insha's face when she was cooking in the kitchen. The spray of the bullet was multi- directional and these were designed to catch the prey on the flight. But several countries used it to contain civilian demonstrators . The crowd- control - measures had blinded civilian protestors. In 2011 a mass uprising in Tahrir square toppled the Egyptian director . At that time a young police lieutenant became infamous because he fired pellets into the eyes of the protestors. His exemplary skills at blinding civilians earned him the nickname ' eye sniper'. The use of rubber bullets by police in the Catalonia region of Spain was banned after at least seven people were blinded by them on the street of Spain.
The former prime minister Manmohan Singh expressed serious concern over the violent protest in 2010. At that time he had called for revisiting the standard operating procedure and stressed upon that non-lethal measures should be used as crowd control technique. He had asked Home Minister P.Chidambaram to form a high- powered committee which would come out with a set of recommendations on non- lethal crowd control measures. No one in central government had expressed regret over the blinding of youth . It was beyond comprehension that why the pock- marked, bullet- ridden face of youth did not move the national media.
In any civilized country minimum necessary application of force should be the fundamental principle that must govern lawful crowd dispersal. The force that is used against the mob should be proportionate to the violent action of the crowd. It should be carefully calibrated . But the highest court of justice on 28th March 2017 during the fourth hearing of J &K Bar association's appeal for banning the use of pellet guns , the Supreme court apparently told the Bar association that it would ask the central government to stop the use of pellet guns if the Bar Association would persuade the youth to stop hurling stones and return to educational institutions. The then chief justice of India J.S Khehar said that 'We can direct them (the government) to suspend use of pellet guns for two weeks, but you must assure that violence and stone pelting will stop'. The response of the Supreme Court to the plea of Jammu Court Bar Association was clearly different form the manner in which it treated the plea of Extra Judicial Victim's Association of Manipur (EEVFM). In its order the Supreme Court said that the Military and paramilitary force can not use exceive force and allegation of brutalities should be probed.
The principle 4 of code of conduct of Police in India stated that as far as practicable the methods of persuasion, advice and warning should be used. Section 130 of the Code of Criminal Procedure stated that if the use of force became unavoidable , only then should the irreducible minimum force be forced.
Wilhelm Reich published a book called The Mass Appeal of Fascism in Germany in early 1930. In that book he pointed to the mass appeal of Fascism in promoting intolerance and prejudice in the nameof development and fascism. The world has much changed . But the self appointed defenders of nationalism had used the same methods to suppress dissent. The book Blood , censored discussed the theory of William Cousins who deliberated upon the making of Ghettoized violent community. According to the theory a person with a marker with indelible black ink went to city square and marked a dozen people with crosses on their forehead and went home. He did this for a few days. Among the marked people one could turned out to be a pickpocket. As soon as he committed the next crime the witness would notice that the perpetrator had mark of cross on his forehead. A few week later a person with a cross on his forehead might enter into an argument and beat a shopkeeper. Now the newspaper would report that these people had become a social menace. Now all the person who had marks on their foreheads became alert though they had nothing to do with the events. They called meeting to form solidarity society and discuss the discrimination they faced. The intelligence branch took cognizance of the meetings and one of the member got arrested for possessing anti- social literature. A demand might be raised demanding the banning of the society. The person who actually marked could come out and proclaimed that those person who had marks on their foreheads were funded by foreign agencies. He then took the mantle of defending common people. In the chain of events a person with mark on his or her forehead would kill the person who marked. The circle of vengeance , reprisals went unabated.
The feminisminindia.com rightly describes that this book not only raises awareness about the realities of the valley but also demands justice of the brutalities. Somehow this book acts as a testimony to the suffering of the people . This book attempts to outline a brief sketch of the conflict in the valley. The authors also made strong plea for for humanity, fairness and justice. In order to understand the ongoing conflict in the valley this book is must read. The concluding words of the book are really touching.
" We are told that a nation can not be strong if it is ethical or compassionate; that these are despicable sign of weakness; that a strong state is a state that is without morality or mercy. Who will tell them how wrong they are? That is only the weak who fell those who are weaker, whose hearts are empty of mercy, who celebrate the weeping of children. The truly strong are those who have the courage to be kind and just."
We hope this book will trigger a wide ranging discussion and draw the readers to a subject which is shrouded in jingoism and state sponsored propaganda.