15/07/2026
I have immense respect for Sonam Wangchuk Sir. He is a scientist, an education reformer, and a social activist who has dedicated his life to serving society and raising issues of national importance. His work has inspired countless people, and for that he deserves appreciation.
However, on this particular issue, I am not fully convinced by the decision to go on a hunger strike. While I respect his right to protest peacefully, I personally feel that such an important cause should remain above political influence.
From the very beginning, I have been observing the role of CJP. In my personal opinion, its approach and messaging have often appeared more politically driven than solution-oriented.
My biggest question is this: the main demand seems to be the resignation of the Education Minister. But if the Minister resigns, what happens next? Another person from the same government may simply take over the post. Will that alone bring justice to the students or permanently stop examination paper leaks?
Instead of focusing only on one person's resignation, I believe the movement should focus on changing the system. CJP should present a clear roadmap explaining how paper leaks can be prevented, what reforms are needed, how transparency and accountability will be ensured, and how such incidents can be stopped permanently. If such a roadmap is presented, I believe many more people would wholeheartedly support the movement.
Every day, influential personalities, political leaders, and educationists visit the protest site to deliver speeches. If they truly stand with the cause, they should also share the responsibility. They can participate in symbolic fasting or even observe a day's hunger strike themselves. Personally, I would have expected the founders and spokespersons of CJP to stand alongside Sonam Wangchuk Sir in this sacrifice, rather than leaving the burden on one individual.
Finally, I sincerely pray that nothing happens to Sonam Wangchuk Sir. His health and life are precious to the nation. If his health were to deteriorate because of this prolonged hunger strike, I believe the leadership of the movement, including its founders and key organizers, would have to answer serious questions about the strategy they adopted. Leadership is not only about raising slogans or addressing gatherings—it is also about protecting those who make the greatest sacrifice for the cause.
My criticism is not directed at Sonam Wangchuk Sir. My respect for him remains unchanged. My concern is about the strategy of the movement. I believe lasting justice will come not only by changing one individual but by changing the system.
This is purely my personal opinion. Others may have different perspectives, and I fully respect their views. If any part of my words has unintentionally hurt anyone's sentiments, I sincerely apologize. My intention is only to express my thoughts respectfully and to encourage constructive discussion.
