https://www.facebook.com/531796530241589/

Vituko Za Garissa County, Garissa Ndogo, Garissa (2025)

19/04/2025

Garissa’s Governor Jets to Coventry on Taxpayer’s Dime—Returns with Empty Promises

While Garissa County grapples with chronic water shortages, impassable roads, and a healthcare system in crisis, its governor has added another chapter to his playbook of wasteful extravagance: a first-class trip to Coventry, UK, to discuss “refugee collaboration” with the city’s mayor. The trip, funded by public money, yielded no tangible benefits for Garissa’s residents—only outrage over misplaced priorities and a blatant disregard for accountability.

# # # **Lavish Travel, Zero Results**
The governor and his delegation reportedly flew first-class to Coventry, a city with no clear connection to Garissa’s pressing needs. The meeting’s agenda—refugee partnerships—raised eyebrows, given that Garissa’s most urgent crises (drought, infrastructure collapse, and unemployment) were conspicuously absent from the discussion. Critics argue the trip was little more than a vanity project, designed to burnish the governor’s international image while ignoring his constituents.

“Why fly to Europe to talk about refugees when our own people are suffering here?” asked Dekow Ali, a Garissa-based activist. “We need water, not workshops. Our governor treats public funds like his personal travel budget.”

# # # **A Pattern of Neglect**
This trip follows a well-established trend. The governor has repeatedly prioritized globe-trotting over governance, chasing photo-ops with foreign dignitaries while:
- **Ghost workers** drain county payrolls.
- **Stalled projects** like the Garissa-Modogashe road languish for years.
- **Communities like Suq-mugdi** endure threats instead of support.

The cost of the Coventry jaunt—estimated at millions of shillings for flights, accommodation, and per diems—could have drilled three boreholes or repaired kilometers of dilapidated roads. Instead, Garissa’s people received vague promises of “future collaboration.”

# # # **Coventry’s Gain, Garissa’s Pain**
The governor’s defenders claim such trips “build partnerships.” But Garissa residents are left wondering: Why seek foreign aid for refugee programs when the county’s own development funds remain unaccounted for? Auditor-General reports have repeatedly flagged mismanagement of billions allocated for water, health, and infrastructure—yet no audits track the returns on these overseas excursions.

“My children walk 10 kilometers to school because buses can’t navigate our ruined roads,” said Halima Abdi, a mother in Garissa Township. “Meanwhile, our leader is sipping tea in Coventry. Shame!”

# # # **Demands for Accountability**
Residents are demanding:
1. **Full disclosure** of trip costs and outcomes.
2. **Repayment** of public funds used for non-essential travel.
3. **Prioritization** of local projects over globetrotting.
4. **Resignation** if the governor cannot articulate a coherent development strategy.

# # # **Conclusion: Leadership Begins at Home**
True collaboration starts with listening to one’s own people. Garissa’s governor cannot claim to advocate for refugees abroad while failing Garissa’s citizens at home. If he wishes to emulate Coventry’s governance, he should start by relocating his office—from his Nairobi mansion to Garissa’s dusty streets, where the real work awaits.

Until then, these trips are not diplomacy. They’re dereliction of duty.

---
*This article reflects widespread frustration among Garissa residents and aligns with audit reports highlighting misuse of county funds. Share your voice: Should leaders be banned from non-essential foreign travel until local crises are resolved?*

*Note: The allegations are based on public expenditure records and grassroots accounts. We urge Garissa County to publish a detailed cost-benefit analysis of the Coventry trip.*

By: Vituko Za Garissa team

13/03/2025

Absentee Leadership & NGO Charades: Garissa’s Governor Abandons His Mandate

Garissa County’s governor has once again bypassed the needs of his constituents to stage a publicity stunt, this time hosting a Dutch NGO delegation led by Sanne van Amorengen—not in Garissa, but at his private residence in Nairobi. This latest act underscores a disturbing pattern: a leader more invested in courting foreign donors than governing his own county, despite sitting on millions in development funds meant to uplift Garissa’s long-neglected communities.

Governance From a Nairobi Mansion

The governor’s decision to host the Dutch NGO at his Nairobi home—misleadingly branded as a “county office”—has sparked outrage. Residents and civil society groups note that the governor rarely sets foot in Garissa, except to intimidate vulnerable groups like the poor mothers of Suq-mugdi market, whom he has reportedly threatened with eviction. Meanwhile, critical issues fester: roads crumble, hospitals lack supplies, and drought-stricken villages beg for functional boreholes.

“How can he claim to represent us when he lives 380 kilometers away?” asked Farhiya Mohamed, a Suq-mugdi market vendor. “He only visits to bully us, not to solve problems. Why meet NGOs in Nairobi instead of showing them our cracked roads and dry taps?”

Begging Abroad While Sitting on Millions

Garissa County receives substantial allocations from Kenya’s national government, including millions earmarked for water, infrastructure, and healthcare. Yet audits consistently reveal mismanagement: ghost workers drain payrolls, contractors vanish after partial payments, and projects stall indefinitely. Instead of rectifying these failures, the governor tours foreign NGOs for “partnerships”—a thinly veiled bid to divert donor funds into opaque ventures.

Critics argue this obsession with Western entities ignores local solutions. “Why beg for handouts when we have our own budget?” said Abdullahi Ibrahim, a Garissa-based engineer. “We have skilled professionals here, but the county hires outsiders or abandons projects. The governor treats NGOs like ATMs, not partners.”

The Suq-mugdi Symbol: Neglect Meets Brutality

The Suq-mugdi market incident epitomizes the governor’s contempt for his people. While mothers struggle to feed families through small-scale trade, the governor allegedly deploys security forces to harass them, claiming the market is “unplanned.” Yet no alternatives are provided, nor are basic amenities like sanitation or water installed. Such cruelty contrasts sharply with his cozy NGO meetings in Nairobi, where no tough questions about accountability are asked.

A County Office That Doesn’t Exist

The governor’s claim that Garissa County operates an office in Nairobi has been debunked by activists and journalists. “There’s no public record of such an office,” said Amina Roble, a transparency advocate. “He’s using his private home to conduct shady deals, far from the scrutiny of Garissa’s people.” This secrecy fuels suspicions that NGO funds—and taxpayer money—are being funneled into private pockets rather than public projects.

The People’s Demands

Garissa’s residents are demanding urgent action:
1. Return to Garissa: The governor must relocate his operations to the county he was elected to serve.
2. Audit & Accountability: Independent audits of all NGO partnerships and county expenditure.
3. End Ghost Projects: Complete stalled developments, starting with water access and road repairs.
4. Protect Vulnerable Groups: Stop harassing Suq-mugdi traders; invest in market upgrades instead.

Leadership or Exploitation?

A governor’s legitimacy hinges on proximity to the people and prioritization of their welfare. By hiding in Nairobi, shaking down NGOs, and intimidating struggling citizens, Garissa’s leader has abandoned this covenant. His legacy risks being defined not by roads built or lives improved, but by photos taken and funds squandered.

Garissa’s people deserve more than a part-time leader obsessed with foreign validation. They deserve a government that works—from Garissa, for Garissa.

This article reflects widespread grievances from Garissa residents, audit reports, and investigative findings. Share your thoughts: Should county leaders reside in the communities they govern?

*Note: The allegations cited are based on public records and grassroots accounts. We urge state agencies to investigate these claims thoroughly.*

26/02/2025

Garissa’s Leadership Crisis: Endless PR Stunts Over Real Development

Garissa County’s leadership continues to prioritize photo opportunities over transformative action, leaving residents disillusioned and development projects stalled. Fresh off a high-profile meeting with representatives from Peace Winds Japan, the governor has again drawn criticism for chasing NGO handouts while ignoring billions in local resources meant to address the region’s dire needs. This pattern of performative politics raises urgent questions: Why chase foreign aid when public coffers remain flush with unutilized funds? Who benefits from these theatrics—locals or leaders?

PR Over Progress: The Peace Winds Controversy

The latest meeting with Peace Winds Japan, a humanitarian NGO, followed a familiar script. While the governor’s office touted “partnerships for development,” insiders reveal the discussions centered on securing donor funds rather than addressing Garissa’s systemic issues—collapsing roads, dysfunctional boreholes, and a healthcare system in crisis. Residents argue such engagements are less about lifting communities and more about laundering political reputations abroad while siphoning resources meant for public good.

“Why beg for peanuts from NGOs when we have billions allocated for roads and water?” asked Mohamed Hassan, a youth leader in Garissa Township. “Our leaders treat us like beggars in our own land. They’d rather pose with foreigners than fix the borehole in my village.”

Billions Unaccounted For, Needs Ignored

Garissa’s county budget, funded by taxpayers and national revenue, has repeatedly been marred by allegations of graft. Auditor-General reports cite glaring discrepancies, including payments to “ghost workers” and inflated contracts awarded to cronies. In 2023 alone, the county received over KSh 7 billion (approximately $54 million), yet critical projects remain incomplete or abandoned.

Meanwhile, communities endure preventable hardships:

- **Water Scarcity**: Over 60% of households lack reliable access to clean water.
- **Roads in Ruins**: Key trade routes like Garissa-Hola remain impassable for months, crippling livelihoods.
- **Healthcare Deserts**: Dilapidated clinics lack staff and medicines, forcing residents to seek care in neighboring counties.

NGOs as Political Tools

Critics argue the governor’s NGO engagements are a smokescreen to deflect from local accountability. By positioning himself as a “champion of partnerships,” he evades scrutiny over misused funds while creating avenues to pocket donor money through opaque agreements. “NGO projects often lack oversight,” said Halima Adan, a civil society advocate. “Contracts go to connected individuals, and communities see little benefit. It’s exploitation dressed as charity.”

A Call for Priorities to Shift
Garissa’s people demand:

1. **Transparency**: Public disclosure of all NGO agreements and county expenditure.
2. **Redirected Focus**: Utilize existing funds to hire qualified engineers, drill boreholes, and repair roads.
3. **Community Inclusion**: Allow locals to lead project identification and monitoring.
4. **Accountability**: Prosecute officials implicated in graft and ghost worker schemes.

Conclusion: Leadership Must Serve, Not Exploit

Garissa’s governor risks cementing a legacy of empty promises and squandered trust. NGOs are not substitutes for accountable governance, and foreign aid cannot replace the responsible use of public funds. If billions in local resources vanish without trace, no amount of donor photo ops will mask the rot.

The people of Garissa deserve leaders who fix boreholes—not those who dig deeper into pockets of privilege.
*This article highlights concerns raised by Garissa residents and public audit reports. Share your voice: How should the county tackle its development crisis?*

---
Vituko Za Garissa County

14/02/2025

Garissa's Development Crisis: When PR Takes Precedence Over Progress

Nestled in Kenya’s northeastern region, Garissa County is a land of untapped potential. Its vibrant communities, rich cultural heritage, and arid yet striking landscapes stand in stark contrast to the chronic underdevelopment that plagues the area. While locals grapple with crumbling infrastructure, water shortages, and stagnant economic opportunities, their leaders appear more invested in public relations theatrics than tangible progress. A recent meeting between Garissa’s governor and a World Food Programme (WFP) representative has become a symbol of this disconnect—a photo-op spectacle that ignored the urgent needs of the people.

The Meeting That Missed the Mark

Last week, the governor’s office proudly shared images of a high-profile meeting with a WFP delegation. But behind the polished visuals lies a troubling reality: the discussion reportedly sidestepped critical issues like road repairs, borehole construction, and healthcare upgrades—grievances repeatedly voiced by residents. Instead, insiders claim the governor prioritized securing “collaborative” photo opportunities, a move critics argue is emblematic of a leadership style that prioritizes optics over outcomes.

For communities in Garissa, the stakes are dire. Roads rendered impassable by floods isolate villages, students miss school during rainy seasons, and women trek kilometers daily to fetch water. Yet these struggles were conspicuously absent from the agenda.

A Pattern of Neglect and Misplaced Priorities

This incident is not isolated. Over the years, residents have watched county budgets swallowed by allegations of graft, cronyism, and “ghost worker” schemes—phantom employees who drain public coffers. Meanwhile, NGOs are increasingly treated as cash cows, with leaders allegedly leveraging partnerships for personal gain rather than community benefit.

“NGOs come and go, but where is *our* government?” lamented Fatuma Ali, a mother of five in Garissa Township. “We see bulldozers and drills in reports, but our taps are still dry. Our children still walk past stalled road projects to reach school.”

The county’s development fund, intended for projects like boreholes and market upgrades, remains shrouded in secrecy. Auditor-General reports have flagged irregularities, yet accountability remains elusive.

The Human Cost of Political Theater
While leaders chase headlines, families pay the price. In Sankuri, a village east of Garissa town, residents rely on a single malfunctioning borehole. “We queue for hours, and sometimes the water is salty. But our governor is busy taking photos,” said Ahmed Abdi, a local farmer.

Similarly, traders along the Garissa-Modogashe route face astronomical costs due to dilapidated roads. “It takes three hours to travel 50 kilometers. Our goods spoil, and repairs eat into profits,” explained Halima Yusuf, a vegetable vendor.

# # # A Call for Accountability and Action
Garissa’s people deserve more than performative diplomacy. They demand:
1. **Transparency**: Public audits of county budgets and NGO partnerships.
2. **Community-Driven Development**: Prioritize projects identified by locals, such as roads, water access, and healthcare facilities.
3. **An End to Ghost Workers**: Redirect misused funds toward hiring skilled workers to maintain infrastructure.
4. **Governance Over Gimmicks**: Leaders must engage citizens—not cameras—to draft actionable development plans.

# # # Conclusion: Real Progress, Not PR Stunts
Garissa’s potential will remain untapped as long as its leaders treat governance as a publicity campaign. NGOs play a vital role in development, but they cannot replace accountable local leadership. The county’s budget—funded by taxpayers—must serve the public, not political insiders.

As the 2025 election cycle approaches, residents are watching. Will their governor pivot from photo ops to paving roads, drilling boreholes, and restoring faith in governance? Or will Garissa remain a case study in misplaced priorities?

The ball is in the leaders’ court. But the people’s patience—much like Garissa’s dusty, cracked roads—is wearing thin.

10/02/2025

Some sane people know the truth even if they don’t have a PHD!!

09/02/2025

Neglected Progress: NEP's Development Stagnation Amidst Regional Disparities in Kenya

President William Ruto’s recent visit to Kenya’s Northeastern Province (NEP) reignited debates over the government’s commitment to equitable development. While the president touted progress, residents and analysts argue that the region remains starved of meaningful government-funded projects, with leaders accused of prioritizing political sycophancy over advocacy. This stagnation contrasts sharply with visible investments in regions like the Rift Valley and Western Kenya, raising questions about systemic neglect and broken promises.

**Promises vs. Reality in NEP**
During his 2022 campaign, President Ruto pledged to bridge historical marginalization in NEP, promising infrastructure, healthcare, and education reforms. Three years later, tangible outcomes are scarce. The few showcased projects, such as donor-funded water initiatives and school renovations, are largely bankrolled by international partners like the UN and NGOs, not the national treasury. For instance, a much-publicized Garissa market upgrade was financed by the European Union, while road projects remain incomplete or poorly maintained.

Local leaders, instead of demanding accountability, have been criticized for applauding token gestures. A resident in Wajir lamented, “We hear about billions allocated in budgets, but our hospitals lack medicine, and our roads are impassable during rains.” Data from the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) underscores this neglect: NEP has the country’s lowest school enrollment rates, highest poverty levels (over 70%), and a 35% unemployment rate.

**Regional Contrasts: Rift Valley and Western Kenya**
Meanwhile, regions like Rift Valley and Western Kenya have seen consistent government investment. In Rift Valley, the extension of the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR), tarmacked roads linking agricultural hubs, and flagship programs like the Itare Dam (despite delays) reflect targeted development. The region also benefits from state-backed subsidies for maize and dairy farmers, bolstering economic activity.

Western Kenya, a political stronghold for opposition leaders, has similarly witnessed progress. The government recently revived Mumias Sugar Company, allocated funds for Kakamega County’s first teaching hospital, and upgraded highways like the Kisumu-Kakamega road. Such projects, though imperfect, highlight a responsiveness absent in NEP.

**Donor Dependency vs. Government Investment**
NEP’s reliance on donor-funded projects reveals a troubling pattern. For example, the UN-Habitat’s $10 million urban program in Mandera stands in stark contrast to the national government’s minimal input. Critics argue this “donor-driven development” fosters dependency while absolving the state of responsibility. In contrast, Rift Valley’s SGR and Western’s infrastructure upgrades are state priorities, funded through budgetary allocations and partnerships with foreign governments like China.

**Leadership and the Politics of Neglect**
NEP’s underdevelopment is compounded by leadership failures. Local MPs and governors face accusations of sycophancy, prioritizing political survival over grassroots advocacy. A Mandera elder noted, “Our leaders rush to praise the president but never push him to deliver.” Meanwhile, leaders in Western and Rift Valley regions leverage their political capital to demand concessions, exemplified by vigorous lobbying for sugar sector reforms or agricultural subsidies.

**Conclusion: A Call for Equity and Accountability**
The disparities between NEP and other regions underscore a persistent inequity in Kenya’s development agenda. While the Rift Valley and Western regions benefit from political patronage and strategic investments, NEP remains trapped in a cycle of neglect and empty rhetoric. For true progress, the government must move beyond donor-driven projects, allocate equitable resources, and empower local leaders to prioritize development over political theater.

As Kenya aspires to become a middle-income economy, bridging these gaps is not just a moral imperative but a strategic necessity. The people of NEP deserve more than photo ops and hollow promises—they deserve a future built on tangible, inclusive growth.

Vituko Za GC

06/02/2025

The president’s visit is summarized by this picture. A poor kid from Garissa wearing his only clothes that seemed to be dirty and tattered. He was used as a photo moment while his leaders who looted his resources are showcasing their loot bellies!!

04/02/2025

Tribal Politics and Accountability in Garissa County: A Critical Analysis of Senator Abdul Haji’s Tenure

By Vituko za GC, Political Analyst

In Kenya’s vibrant yet complex political landscape, the role of a senator is designed to be both representative and supervisory—a safeguard ensuring that county governments operate transparently and in the public interest. In Garissa County, however, recent developments suggest that Senator Abdul Haji’s approach may be straying from these democratic ideals. Allegations indicate that his tenure has been marked by a reliance on tribal loyalties, a reluctance to hold the county’s executive leadership accountable, and an apparent patronage system that sees influential positions within the county government awarded based on allegiance rather than merit.

The Mandate of the Kenyan Senator
Under Kenya’s devolved system of government, senators are expected to serve as the voice of their counties at the national level. Their duties include scrutinizing county budgets, overseeing county executives, and ensuring that local governments adhere to legal and ethical standards. This oversight is critical in a system where power is divided between national and county governments. When a senator fails to perform these functions rigorously, the checks and balances that protect citizens from mismanagement and corruption become dangerously weakened.

Allegations of Tribalism and Patronage
At the heart of the controversy surrounding Senator Abdul Haji lies an accusation of tribalism. Critics argue that instead of fostering inclusive governance, his approach has reinforced ethnic divisions—a tactic that, while politically expedient, undermines national unity and the principle of equal representation. By reportedly prioritizing his own tribal group, the senator is accused of creating a system where loyalty to ethnic identity supersedes competence and accountability.

Further compounding these concerns is the allegation that Senator Haji has permitted—and perhaps even orchestrated—the placement of cronies in key county government positions. Such a practice, if verified, not only stifles the merit-based recruitment of public servants but also erodes public trust in the mechanisms of local governance. The perception that positions are being allocated on the basis of tribal affiliation or personal loyalty can lead to widespread cynicism about the political system, diminishing citizen engagement and stifling the potential for constructive oversight.

The Implications of Non-Accountability
A central pillar of effective governance is accountability. In the context of Garissa County, the senator’s failure to hold the county governor accountable has serious ramifications. When legislative oversight is compromised, it paves the way for unchecked executive power—a scenario that can breed corruption and mismanagement. By not confronting the governor on policies, expenditures, or administrative decisions that may be questionable, Senator Haji is seen by some as complicit in allowing a governance culture where tribal loyalties and patronage networks overshadow transparency and accountability.

This lack of accountability not only weakens the institutional framework meant to protect public resources but also sets a dangerous precedent. It signals to other public officials that personal or tribal interests may outweigh the collective good, thereby eroding the foundational trust between the electorate and their representatives.

Broader Political and Social Consequences
The alleged actions of Senator Abdul Haji cannot be viewed in isolation. They form part of a broader pattern observed in various parts of Kenya, where tribal politics continues to influence decision-making and public service delivery. This phenomenon often leaves marginalized groups further disenfranchised and undermines the efforts to build a truly inclusive political environment.

When a senator resorts to tribalism and patronage, it does more than skew the balance of power—it perpetuates a cycle where accountability is sacrificed for short-term political gains. Over time, this dynamic can lead to systemic corruption, hamper socio-economic development, and deepen ethnic divisions, all of which are detrimental to the long-term stability and prosperity of the county and the nation at large.

Conclusion
The case of Senator Abdul Haji in Garissa County highlights the critical importance of maintaining ethical standards and robust accountability mechanisms in public office. While the allegations of tribalism and patronage remain subjects of intense debate, they serve as a stark reminder of the challenges inherent in balancing personal loyalties with public responsibility. For Garissa County—and indeed for all regions in Kenya—the path forward lies in recommitting to the principles of transparency, meritocracy, and inclusive governance.

As the public continues to scrutinize the actions of their representatives, it is imperative that political leaders reflect on their mandate: to serve all citizens equally and to foster an environment where accountability is not merely an ideal, but a practiced reality. Only through such measures can Kenya hope to transcend divisions and build a governance system that truly works for the people.

05/01/2025

Unmasking Corruption in Garissa County: A Deep Dive into Governor Nathif’s Alleged Misdeeds

Corruption in public office is not just a betrayal of trust; it is a direct attack on the people it claims to serve. In Garissa County, mounting allegations against Governor Nathif Jama Adam paint a damning picture of mismanagement, embezzlement, and nepotism. While the county languishes in underdevelopment, the governor and his close associates appear to thrive, raising urgent questions about governance, accountability, and the future of Garissa.

A Mirage of Development
Garissa’s official budget allocations suggest promising development. However, on the ground, tangible evidence of this is almost nonexistent. Roads remain dilapidated, healthcare facilities are ill-equipped, and schools face severe resource constraints. What stands out instead are World Bank-funded projects, which, although initially promising, are increasingly marred by allegations of cronyism and mismanagement.

These projects, meant to alleviate poverty and provide basic infrastructure, are reportedly channeled into the hands of pseudo-contractors closely linked to the governor’s family and associates. The intention behind this seems clear: to siphon public funds into private coffers under the guise of progress.

The Private Accounts Scandal
One of the gravest allegations involves the use of private accounts to embezzle public funds. Insider sources and whistleblowers claim that significant sums of county funds are funneled into accounts controlled by the governor and his immediate family. These accounts, some newly created, serve as conduits for diverting money meant for Garissa’s development.

The lavish lifestyles of those close to the governor starkly contrast with the poverty and underdevelopment suffered by the majority of Garissa’s residents. It begs the question: how can a leader entrusted with the county’s future justify such disparity?

World Bank Projects: A Double-Edged Sword
The World Bank's involvement in development projects often comes with rigorous accountability measures. However, in Garissa, even these projects seem to be falling victim to corruption. Reports suggest that contracts for World Bank-funded initiatives are being awarded to companies owned or controlled by individuals close to the governor. These pseudo-contractors then inflate costs or abandon projects altogether, leaving the county with unfinished or substandard work.

While the World Bank requires transparency, the local ex*****on of these projects reveals systemic flaws. Garissa residents fear that funds meant for them are being used to enrich a select few, while the real needs of the county remain unmet.

The Cost of Corruption
The implications of such corruption are far-reaching. When funds are stolen, the people suffer. Hospitals cannot offer adequate care, children miss out on quality education, and businesses struggle due to poor infrastructure. Beyond the economic toll, such betrayal erodes public trust in governance, leaving citizens disillusioned and disengaged.

For Garissa, this trust deficit is particularly damaging. The county has immense potential, from its rich cultural heritage to its strategic location. However, corruption undermines this potential, perpetuating a cycle of poverty and dependency.

Demanding Accountability
Governor Nathif’s administration must be held accountable. Citizens, civil society organizations, and independent oversight bodies must come together to demand transparency in public spending. Investigations into these allegations should be conducted with impartiality, and those found guilty must face the full weight of the law.

Furthermore, institutions like the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) and the Auditor-General’s Office must prioritize Garissa’s case. The World Bank should also reassess its project management in the region, ensuring funds are used as intended and penalizing those who exploit the system.

The People’s Voice
Garissa’s citizens must not remain silent. The fight against corruption requires collective action, from grassroots activism to public pressure on county leadership. Social media, local forums, and peaceful protests can amplify their voices and shine a light on the injustices they face.

A Call for Justice
Garissa deserves better. The allegations against Governor Nathif, if proven true, represent a gross abuse of power and an affront to the people he swore to serve. For the county to prosper, accountability must prevail. It is time for the people of Garissa to reclaim their future from the grip of corruption and demand leaders who prioritize public service over personal gain.

Let this serve as a rallying call: corruption has no place in leadership. Garissa’s story is not just about one county—it is a testament to the need for vigilance, transparency, and integrity in governance everywhere.

Vituko Za Garissa County

19/04/2025

13/03/2025

26/02/2025

14/02/2025

10/02/2025

09/02/2025

06/02/2025

04/02/2025

05/01/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category