
22/08/2025
County Cabinet Reshuffles: Political Tools or Instruments of Service Delivery
Bungoma Governor Kenneth Lusaka has cautioned county staff against engaging in premature political campaigns, warning that the trend undermines service delivery. Speaking at the county headquarters, the governor issued a one-week ultimatum to public officers engaged in politics to either resign and pursue their ambitions or focus on public service. “We have given you public jobs to serve wananchi, not to spend time politicking and campaigning for yourselves or others,” Lusaka declared, vowing to dismiss any officer found flouting the directive.
At the same event, Lusaka announced a reshuffle of his County Executive Committee (CEC) and Chief Officers, presenting it as a strategy to realign roles and strengthen service delivery. Among the changes: the CEC for Lands and Urban Planning, Douglas Sasita, was moved to Trade and Energy, while Dr. Monicah Fedha swapped roles to head Lands, Urban and Physical Planning. Chief Officers were also redeployed between Education and Lands.
A Critical Lens: Do Reshuffles Really Improve Service Delivery? While cabinet reshuffles are often framed as measures to boost efficiency, the Kenyan devolution experience suggests otherwise. Frequent reshuffles can destabilize county administrations, disrupt continuity of policy, and weaken institutional memory. In many cases, they serve more as political balancing acts, appeasing allies, neutralizing rivals, or projecting control than genuine attempts at reform.
From a national perspective, reshuffles raise a larger question: are counties prioritizing long-term institutional strengthening, or are they recycling personnel in a bid to be seen as responsive? In practice, service delivery challenges such as weak planning, resource mismanagement, corruption, and lack of technical capacity are rarely solved by merely switching personnel from one docket to another. Moreover, the governor’s warning against premature campaigns—while valid—also underscores the politicization of county bureaucracies. Public officers, caught between political loyalty and professional duty, often treat reshuffles and directives as political signals rather than administrative reforms.
Devolution Dilemma: Twelve years since devolution took root, reshuffles across counties from Bungoma to Mombasa, Kisii to Turkana; illustrate the fragility of governance structures. The effectiveness of county governments cannot be judged by the frequency of cabinet shake-ups but by measurable improvements in healthcare, education, urban planning, and local economic development. Unless reshuffles are grounded in performance audits, meritocracy, and capacity-building, they risk becoming cosmetic gestures reshaping faces but not fixing systems. Kenya’s devolution journey requires more than managerial musical chairs; it demands policy consistency, institutional accountability, and insulation of public service from political campaigns.