https://www.facebook.com/216643862105659/

K T Arap Chepkwony 2, Moi Avenue, Nairobi (2025)

30/07/2025

In a moment intended for ceremonial unity and policy affirmation, a routine prayer at the highest seat of executive authority took a striking turn — not into praise, but into prophetic rebuke. What was expected to be a symbolic invocation became a moral interrogation, delivered in the presence of the nation’s top leadership. Without raising voices, the message raised questions. It was not just a prayer; it was a mirror held up to power.

Drawing upon deeply familiar spiritual narratives, the prayer leader invoked stories of individuals who misused privilege, concealed truth, and were ultimately met with divine and irreversible consequences. The references were direct, the tone deliberate, and the timing unmistakable. The prayer’s language was rich with symbolism — about wealth unjustly acquired, betrayal wrapped in silver, and justice that transcends earthly courts. For a moment, governance stood still under the weight of spiritual accountability.

Those in attendance — elected leaders, appointed officials, and national dignitaries — were not merely witnesses but the intended audience. It was a rare and sobering spectacle: governance subjected to godly scrutiny, with the law being signed even as the law of conscience was invoked. Observers across the country noted the body language, the silences, and the subtle shifts in posture. Questions emerged not just about policy, but about posture — and whether reverence for justice goes beyond the pen and enters the heart.

The public reaction has been sharp and wide-ranging. Many saw the moment as a brave appeal for national integrity, a cry for leaders to match policy with personal example. Others questioned whether such a setting was appropriate for such bold declarations. But one thing is clear: the moment disrupted the norm. It reminded the country that fighting corruption is not merely a technical or legislative affair — it is a moral struggle, one that demands truthfulness, humility, and accountability at every level.

As the laws signed that day move into implementation, the true measure of progress will not lie in pages printed or speeches delivered, but in whether the culture of impunity is truly broken. Citizens are watching not for performances, but for principle. They are not just listening for promises, but for proof. The intersection of faith and leadership — if taken seriously — can be a powerful force for reform.

What happened was not just a prayer. It was a pause. A reminder. A challenge. And possibly, a beginning.

30/07/2025

The recent arrest of Mr. Bernard Maina Kiama in Molo has brought into sharp focus the tension between online expression, digital anonymity, and the legal and moral responsibilities that come with occupying public digital spaces. Allegedly operating under the pseudonymous identity of "Martha Hinga Official," a page known for publishing sensational exposés and controversial allegations, Mr. Kiama’s case raises broader questions about cyber ethics, the power of social media, and the limits of religious and personal freedom when entangled with issues of deception and public trust.

According to police reports, Mr. Kiama was apprehended while posing as a pastor affiliated with the Repentance and Holiness Church. He was accompanied by a TikTok personality and had reportedly sought to pray for a murder suspect in custody at the Molo Police Station. Upon interrogation and refusal to produce identification, police say Mr. Kiama eventually identified himself not only by his legal name but also as the administrator of the Martha Hinga Official page — a digital platform that has drawn both public fascination and fury due to its unfiltered revelations and allegations targeting religious leaders, public servants, and celebrities.

While the legal process must be allowed to take its course, this incident shines a light on the broader debate surrounding anonymous or pseudonymous digital activism. The Martha Hinga persona has operated with an air of mystery, claiming to be a moral crusader exposing hidden truths, particularly within Kenya’s religious circles. However, many have accused the page of lacking journalistic integrity, spreading unverified claims, and engaging in public shaming without recourse or accountability.

The case also reveals the vulnerabilities within religious institutions and law enforcement when confronted with individuals who blur the lines between faith-based identity and personal agendas. Posing as a clergyman to gain access to a murder suspect, if confirmed, is not only ethically troubling but also undermines the sacred role of pastoral access in criminal justice settings. It may further contribute to public cynicism toward religious leaders and institutions who are often caught in the crossfire of unverified accusations.

However, this is not merely about one individual. The digital age has empowered individuals to reach massive audiences without institutional checks or editorial oversight. While this has democratized expression, it has also enabled abuse, impersonation, and digital vigilantism. There is an urgent need to rethink how Kenya manages digital platforms, especially where anonymity is used to perpetuate reputational harm or incite social unrest. But such reforms must be approached with care to avoid infringing on genuine whistleblowing, activism, and journalistic freedom.

As the matter proceeds through the judicial system, it is imperative that it is handled with transparency, fairness, and strict adherence to the rule of law. Mr. Kiama, like any other Kenyan, is entitled to due process and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. At the same time, this moment presents a unique opportunity for reflection — for digital influencers, religious leaders, media consumers, and policy makers alike — on how truth, dignity, and justice must be upheld in both virtual and real-world engagements.

In a society increasingly shaped by what trends online, the question is no longer just about what is said, but who says it, how, and at what cost. The balance between truth-telling and responsible communication is delicate — and essential.

30/07/2025

You Are Not Late: The Wisdom of Sacred Timing

In today’s fast-paced world, many feel the silent pressure of comparison — the belief that success must come early, or not at all. But our grandparents, especially among the Kalenjin and other African communities, taught us otherwise. They reminded us that “no calf outruns its shadow”, and that each person moves in tune with the rhythm they were created to follow.

Comparison is the thief of peace, not just joy. It convinces people that they are falling behind when, in truth, they are walking their unique path. The Kalenjin say, "what ripens by the riverbank does not race the one on the hilltop. The environment, the season, and the journey are different for each of us — and that’s perfectly natural.

Some bloom early, like morning flowers touched by the sun. Others find their strength under pressure, like roots breaking through rock. And some only rise after breaking — when the pain of falling becomes the soil of rebirth. There is no shame in starting again, and no dishonor in healing quietly.

To those who rush blindly or mock the wisdom of age, our elders offered a stern warning:
“The young goat that mocks the old ends up sleeping in the cold.”
This Kalenjin proverb reminds us that haste without wisdom, and progress without humility, can lead to regret. In dismissing those who walked before us, we risk walking blindly into the same holes they tried to warn us about.

Even when unseen, your growth matters. As another proverb says, “The millet that germinates in silence feeds the household later.” You may not be celebrated now, but you are becoming — deeply, steadily, and in your own sacred time.

Let us honor that truth — in ourselves, and in others. And may we raise a generation that walks, not in haste, but in harmony with the quiet wisdom of their ancestors.

30/07/2025

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time

30/07/2025

Courage Beyond Her Years: Why Rebecca Juma Deserves National Honor

In a world where heroism is often defined by uniforms, medals, and adult accomplishments, the actions of 11-year-old Rebecca Juma stand as a powerful reminder that courage does not come with age — it comes from the heart. Her fearless intervention during a crocodile attack on her 9-year-old friend at the Galana River is not just a story of bravery, but a call to recognize the remarkable strength and instincts of our children.

It is difficult to imagine the terror of watching a crocodile emerge from the water and seize someone you love. For most people, the natural response would be paralysis — to freeze, scream, or flee. But Rebecca did the unimaginable. She launched herself at the crocodile, climbed onto its back, and jabbed its eyes — one of the only known ways to force the beast to release its grip. In that moment, she was not a schoolgirl. She was a protector, a warrior, and a symbol of selfless courage.

What makes Rebecca’s act even more profound is that she operated with no training, no preparation, and no safety net. She acted on instinct, love, and urgency — characteristics that too often go unnoticed in our youth. Wildlife experts affirm that attacking a crocodile’s eyes is one of the few effective responses, but even trained rangers hesitate to engage these predators up close. That this young girl succeeded in saving a life and surviving the ordeal with only minor injuries is nothing short of miraculous.

Rebecca’s heroism should not be a footnote in the news. It deserves celebration, support, and investment. She has displayed not only bravery but leadership, decision-making under pressure, and emotional maturity — qualities that we claim to value in society. Kenya must recognize and honor such acts, not just to uplift Rebecca, but to send a message to every child that their actions matter and their courage counts.

Moreover, Rebecca’s story sheds light on the challenges rural children face daily — including unsafe access to water. It is a painful irony that this heroic act unfolded in the context of a routine chore that exposes many children to danger. Let her bravery not only be commemorated, but let it inspire change: investment in safe water points, child protection in wildlife zones, and platforms that nurture young leaders.

In honoring Rebecca Juma, we do more than applaud her bravery — we affirm the value of every child’s life and potential. She is a national treasure, and her courage deserves a place in our hearts, our schools, and our history.

30/07/2025

The Dormant Right: Revisiting the Recall of MPs in Kenya

In a democracy, the ability of citizens to hold their elected representatives accountable is not just a principle—it is a pillar. Kenya’s 2010 Constitution recognized this by enshrining in Article 104 the right of voters to recall their Member of Parliament (MP) before the end of a five-year term. However, despite the clarity of this constitutional intent, the actual implementation of this right has stalled, owing to the absence of a functional legal framework. This gap not only frustrates citizens' expectations but also raises important questions about democratic accountability and legislative will.

The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) has rightly pointed out that, as of now, there is no enabling legislation to operationalize the recall process. While the Elections Act of 2011 initially provided mechanisms for recalling MPs—through Sections 45 to 48—those provisions were struck down by the High Court in 2017. The court found them to be ambiguous, burdensome, and unconstitutional, particularly in how they limited the right of an MP to a fair hearing and how they failed to define a clear, objective threshold for misconduct or non-performance. Since then, Parliament has not enacted new legislation to replace the annulled provisions.

This legal vacuum has effectively rendered the right of recall dormant, leaving voters with no practical means to initiate the process—even in cases where their representative is widely perceived as ineffective, absent, or compromised. The absence of this tool can lead to growing public frustration, political apathy, or even reactionary populism, especially in moments of crisis or scandal. For a maturing democracy like Kenya, this undermines not just accountability but public trust in electoral and legislative institutions.
Yet this challenge presents an opportunity for reform. The way forward must begin with Parliament taking deliberate steps to craft a new, fair, and constitutionally sound legal framework. This law should clearly outline:

● Grounds for recall, such as gross misconduct, incompetence, or violation of public trust;

● Procedural safeguards, including the MP’s right to respond to accusations;

● Reasonable thresholds, such as signatures from a certain percentage of registered voters in the constituency; and

● A neutral adjudication process, possibly through IEBC and the courts, to prevent political misuse.

Additionally, the process should avoid being overly complex or financially prohibitive for ordinary citizens. At the same time, it must guard against abuse by ensuring that MPs are not subjected to harassment or politically motivated recalls every time they take an unpopular but principled stand.

In conclusion, while the recall provision remains a noble democratic aspiration, it cannot be realized through constitutional text alone. It requires bold legislative action, public dialogue, and political goodwill. Reinstating a credible recall mechanism would reaffirm Kenya’s commitment to responsive leadership, and more importantly, to the principle that power belongs to the people—not just on election day, but throughout the life of Parliament.

30/07/2025

Health, Humanity, and the Pursuit of Justice: The Abyan Hospital Detention Case

The recent ordeal facing a family from Loitokitok—whose son is reportedly being detained at Abyan Hospital in Nairobi—has brought to the fore deep concerns about the intersection of healthcare, justice, and ethics in Kenya. According to the family, their son was initially to be referred to Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), but was instead taken to a private facility now demanding a staggering KSh 3 million before he can be released. Disturbingly, the family also alleges they have been denied access to see him.

This case raises not only humanitarian concerns but also possible legal questions. If it emerges that the patient was rerouted to the private hospital without the family’s informed consent—and possibly through collusion between healthcare officials and private actors—then this may constitute a conspiracy to defraud, a criminal offence under Kenyan law. Such allegations warrant thorough scrutiny, not just by medical regulators, but also by investigative agencies such as the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI).

Kenya’s Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to the highest attainable standard of health. While private hospitals operate under legitimate business models and must recover costs, detaining patients for inability to pay—particularly under contested circumstances—poses serious ethical and legal questions. The situation is further compounded if the decision to admit a patient to an expensive private facility was done without transparent communication or proper referral procedure.

At the heart of this issue lies the broader question of medical accountability and patient dignity. Was the family adequately briefed on the costs involved? Were there any irregularities in the referral? Were financial motivations prioritized over patient welfare? These are questions that must be answered not just for this family, but for the sake of all vulnerable Kenyans who risk falling prey to predatory practices disguised as healthcare.

As such, a multi-pronged response is needed. The Medical Practitioners and Dentists Council (MPDC) and the Ministry of Health should initiate a regulatory audit of the referral and billing process in this case. Simultaneously, the DCI should investigate any elements of criminal conspiracy, fraud, or unlawful detention, should credible evidence emerge. This should not be construed as a witch hunt, but as a necessary step in ensuring trust in the health sector.

In the interim, there is an urgent humanitarian need to assist the family—whether through legal aid, public fundraising, or policy-level advocacy. Let this moment serve as a catalyst for honest reflection and structural reform. After all, the mark of a just society is how it treats its most vulnerable—not with suspicion or silence, but with compassion and accountability.

29/07/2025

Balancing Safety and Care: The Delicate Impact of New Hospital Security Protocols on Frontline Healthcare Workers

In response to the tragic murders that occurred within the grounds of Kenyatta National Hospital, Health Cabinet Secretary Aden Duale has taken bold and commendable steps to restore public trust and reinforce safety within public healthcare institutions. His directive—mandating a two-visitor limit per patient, compulsory screening of all visitors, installation of 24/7 CCTV systems, documentation of all individuals bringing patients (including police officers), and enhanced collaboration with National Government Administrative Officers (NGAOs)—signals a strong and timely commitment to ensuring that hospitals are not just places of healing, but also of safety.

However, as with any significant policy shift, the new measures—though well-intentioned—present complex implications for the very people at the heart of our healthcare system: the frontline workers. These are the nurses, clinical officers, admission clerks, emergency responders, and intern doctors who keep the machinery of care moving, often under immense pressure and with limited resources.

From a security standpoint, it is clear that a more regulated and monitored hospital environment will act as a deterrent to criminal activity, facilitate forensic accountability, and restore order in spaces that had grown vulnerable to infiltration. Yet, it is equally important to acknowledge that frontline staff now face a heightened burden—not just of care, but also of compliance enforcement.

Receptionists and triage nurses will likely bear the brunt of enforcing visitor limits, screening procedures, and documentation protocols. While they may not have signed up to be security officers, they will now be required to enforce rules that are bound to provoke frustration, emotional outbursts, or even confrontation from anxious or grieving family members. Without adequate support, this policy risks inadvertently placing healthcare workers at the crossroads of conflict between institutional security needs and public expectations for compassion and flexibility.

Moreover, the integration of 24/7 surveillance—while useful for deterring crime—raises questions around privacy and psychological pressure for both patients and staff. It is essential that surveillance systems be implemented with clear protocols to prevent misuse and to protect the dignity of medical personnel as well as patients, especially in sensitive departments such as maternity, pediatrics, and psychiatric care.

Perhaps the most sensitive provision in the new directive is the requirement for mandatory identification of all persons delivering patients—including uniformed officers. While this is a necessary safeguard against abuse of authority and covert operations, it introduces a layer of tension between hospital personnel and security agencies. Without strong inter-agency communication and mutual respect, frontline workers could be caught in the uncomfortable position of questioning law enforcement officers without adequate backup or protection.

It is, therefore, imperative that the rollout of these security measures be matched with commensurate support systems. Hospitals should be equipped with professional security personnel, not rely on healthcare workers to enforce safety protocols. Frontline staff must be trained in de-escalation tactics and be offered access to psychosocial support, recognizing that safety is both a physical and emotional need. Additionally, clear and well-communicated protocols must be established to ensure cooperation between hospitals and police forces, so that the burden of verification and compliance does not fall unfairly on medical personnel.

The directive by CS Duale is an important step forward in securing Kenya’s public health institutions. Yet, true security will only be achieved if those who deliver care are themselves protected, respected, and empowered. This moment offers an opportunity not just to fortify hospitals against external threats, but to strengthen the system from within—through investment in people, process, and preparedness.

In the end, the goal must be harmony: a hospital where care and caution coexist, where healing is shielded by vigilance, and where the dignity of both patient and caregiver remains intact.

29/07/2025

Thanks for being a top engager and making it on to my weekly engagement list! 🎉 Neema Mshindi Victoria, Gãthēchã Wã Kãmaù, Victor Oyugi, Noah Langat, Wycliffe Mwalo Murese, James Katambani, Carolyne Rutto, Lucy Luccile, Ski Knee, Catherine Munyao

28/07/2025

Stateless, Alone, and Unwell: The Case of Kennedy Kalombotole and the Complexities of Justice

In the often overlooked corners of our justice system lie cases that stretch the limits of law, morality, and human compassion. One such case is that of Kennedy Kalombotole, a man who embodies multiple vulnerabilities: statelessness, mental illness, absence of known relatives, and accusations of two murder charges. His case compels us to examine not only the legal processes involved, but the humanity—or lack thereof—with which society responds to individuals on the margins.

To be stateless is to belong nowhere. Kalombotole has no national identity, no consular protection, and no formal documentation to anchor him to any nation’s legal system. Stateless persons are often caught in limbo, denied the basic privileges of citizenship, including access to healthcare, legal aid, and social services. When such a person is accused of a serious crime, the complexities multiply. Which country owns the responsibility to prosecute—or protect—him? Who stands in court to advocate for his welfare?

In Kennedy Kalombotole’s case, the situation is further compounded by reports of mental illness. Across the world, criminal justice systems recognize that mental incapacity can undermine one’s ability to stand trial. A person must be fit to plead, understand the charges against them, and participate meaningfully in their defense. If Kalombotole is found unfit through psychiatric evaluation, then the justice system has an obligation to shift focus from punishment to treatment and supervision.

But without family, legal representation, or a home country to intervene, Kalombotole's fate rests entirely with the host state. It becomes a test of that country’s commitment to human rights and justice. International legal frameworks—including the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the 1954 Convention on the Status of Stateless Persons—require that such individuals receive humane treatment, legal safeguards, and access to medical care regardless of their citizenship status or the charges they face.

This case raises an urgent and necessary question: How do we ensure justice does not abandon those whom society has already forgotten? If our justice system cannot accommodate individuals like Kennedy Kalombotole with dignity, oversight, and compassion, then we risk reducing justice to a privilege of the documented and the sane.

Kennedy Kalombotole is not merely a suspect; he is also a mirror reflecting our legal system’s moral obligations. His case should inspire not only legal procedure but policy reform, where stateless persons and the mentally ill are given protections tailored to their unique vulnerabilities. It is a call to reaffirm that justice—true justice—must reach even the most invisible among us.

Let us respond not only as courts, but as a society that still believes in the value of human life, even when it's most difficult to defend.

28/07/2025

I got over 100 reactions on my posts last week! Thanks everyone for your support! 🎉

K T Arap Chepkwony 2

30/07/2025

30/07/2025

30/07/2025

30/07/2025

30/07/2025

30/07/2025

30/07/2025

29/07/2025

29/07/2025

28/07/2025

28/07/2025

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category